Re: [FFmpeg-user] "interlace"

2020-09-06 Thread Carl Zwanzig
On 9/6/2020 12:33 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: Or in other words: We will certainly not change our definition of "interlaced video" - many people seem to understand it. Sounds rather strong ("certainly not"), but those of us coming from the NTSC analog world all understood the concept of "inter

Re: [FFmpeg-user] "interlace"

2020-09-06 Thread Mark Filipak
On 09/06/2020 05:24 PM, Edward Park wrote: I have great respect for you, Ted. Tell me: What is interlaced video? Well that is unwarranted, possibly spiteful, even, to someone as insecure as me ;) Hahahaha... Ted I want you to do something for me. Take your right hand, put it over your left

Re: [FFmpeg-user] "interlace"

2020-09-06 Thread Edward Park
> I have great respect for you, Ted. Tell me: What is interlaced video? Well that is unwarranted, possibly spiteful, even, to someone as insecure as me ;) That is the real question isn't it. Probably won't be very satisfying but I'll try to describe it. Probably not useful to say it's video th

Re: [FFmpeg-user] "interlace"

2020-09-06 Thread Mark Filipak
On 09/06/2020 04:16 PM, Edward Park wrote: Hi, In the case of "interlace": "It's interlaced video" -- video in which the lines alternate (i.e. are interlaced) between two (or theoretically, more) fields (e.g. odd-even-odd-even...). That employs the past participle of the verb, "interlace", as

Re: [FFmpeg-user] "interlace"

2020-09-06 Thread Mark Filipak
On 09/06/2020 03:33 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: Am So., 6. Sept. 2020 um 21:27 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak : All of the ffmpeg documentation that uses the word "interlaced" should be checked for accuracy. Since real-world users are using this documentation it should only be carefully changed. O

Re: [FFmpeg-user] "interlace"

2020-09-06 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Am So., 6. Sept. 2020 um 21:27 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak : > All of the ffmpeg documentation that uses the word "interlaced" > should be checked for accuracy. Since real-world users are using this documentation it should only be carefully changed. Or in other words: We will certainly not change o

Re: [FFmpeg-user] "interlace"

2020-09-06 Thread Mark Filipak
On 09/06/2020 04:16 PM, Edward Park wrote: Hi, In the case of "interlace": "It's interlaced video" -- video in which the lines alternate (i.e. are interlaced) between two (or theoretically, more) fields (e.g. odd-even-odd-even...). That employs the past participle of the verb, "interlace", as

Re: [FFmpeg-user] "interlace"

2020-09-06 Thread Edward Park
Hi, > In the case of "interlace": > "It's interlaced video" -- video in which the lines alternate (i.e. are > interlaced) between two (or theoretically, more) fields (e.g. > odd-even-odd-even...). That employs the past participle of the verb, > "interlace", as an adjective to modify "video". >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] "interlace"

2020-09-06 Thread Mark Filipak
On 09/06/2020 03:32 PM, Bouke wrote: On 06 Sep 2020, at 21:26, Mark Filipak wrote: Conclusion: Employing the past participle, "interlaced", to a field-based video stream is just plain wrong. Can you just shut up / stop spreading nonsense? How is it nonsense? The present participle, "in

Re: [FFmpeg-user] "interlace"

2020-09-06 Thread Bouke
> On 06 Sep 2020, at 21:26, Mark Filipak > wrote: > > > Conclusion: Employing the past participle, "interlaced", to a field-based > video stream is just plain wrong. Can you just shut up / stop spreading nonsense? Bouke Edit ‘B / VideoToolShed.com van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33 6512 AS Nijme

[FFmpeg-user] "interlace"

2020-09-06 Thread Mark Filipak
Admittedly, this is an anal-compulsive topic. But good documentation often requires anal compulsion. Good documentation definitely requires thorough knowledge of language usage. The topic is use of the various forms of the word "interlace". But I'm going to use the word "build" as an example be

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Interlace vs. Interleaved Fields

2018-09-02 Thread Chris
Thank you, Kieran. That didn't work (it came out progressive) but this does: ffmpeg -y -i "C0008.MP4" -s 1920x1080 -pix_fmt yuv422p10le -vf interlace -flags +ildct+ilme -acodec copy output.mp4 You must add the flags ildct and ilme (interlace discrete cosine transform and interlace motion est

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Interlace vs. Interleaved Fields

2018-09-02 Thread Kieran O Leary
Hi On Sun, 2 Sep 2018, 23:45 Chris, wrote: > What is the syntax for adding "interlace"? This isn't working: > > ffmpeg -y -i "C0003.MP4" -s 1920x1080 -pix_fmt yuv422p10le > interlace-acodec copy output.mp4 > It's a video filter,so try -vf interlace. ffmpeg -y -i "C0003.MP4" -s 1920x1

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Interlace vs. Interleaved Fields

2018-09-02 Thread Chris
e -acodec copy output.mp4 The input file is 1080p. -Original Message- From: Bob DeCarlo To: ffmpeg-user Sent: Sun, Sep 2, 2018 12:54 pm Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] Interlace vs. Interleaved Fields Have you looked into the FFMPEG manual section: 38.93 interlace?"Simple inter

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Interlace vs. Interleaved Fields

2018-09-02 Thread Bob DeCarlo
Have you looked into the FFMPEG manual section: 38.93 interlace? "Simple interlacing filter from progressive contents." ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above,

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Interlace vs. Interleaved Fields

2018-09-02 Thread Chris
reporting "interlace" and "interleave" correctly. -Original Message- From: Jerome Martinez To: ffmpeg-user Sent: Sun, Sep 2, 2018 3:24 am Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] Interlace vs. Interleaved Fields On 9/1/2018 11:12 PM, Chris wrote:> What is the difference

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Interlace vs. Interleaved Fields

2018-09-02 Thread Jerome Martinez
On 9/1/2018 11:12 PM, Chris wrote: What is the difference, if any, between "Interleaved Fields" and "Interlace" as far as MediaInfo is concerned? Interlaced content can be coded in different manners: - Interleaved fields : line 0, 1, 2, 3 ... 476, 477, 478, 479 (in 1 block), similar to how p

[FFmpeg-user] Interlace vs. Interleaved Fields

2018-09-01 Thread Chris
I am trying to add interlace to a progressive-scan clip using this code: -vf "fieldorder=tff","tinterlace=merge" -flags +ilme+ildct Most of the time MediaInfo reports "Interleaved Fields". Under different circumstances it reports "Interlace". What is the difference, if any, between "Interleav