Emre Besirik:
> Because you can read it without scrolling, first thing you see is my response,
I will intervene once in this thread because this is a good occasion: I do
not want to see your response first thing. You are not alone in the world.
You came here for help and only follow one discussion
Am 24.03.2016 um 01:32 schrieb Emre Besirik:
Because you can read it without scrolling
bullshit - to understand what you are talking about in a longer
discussion where you quote anything else below *i need to scroll down*
and try to find out what exactly you refer to
signature.asc
Descr
Am 24.03.2016 um 01:34 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 24.03.2016 um 01:20 schrieb Emre Besirik:
What I don’t get is; why do you think it is more cluttering when
top-posting???
because in a technical discussion with several replies of different
peoples you need to find out what the response is tal
Am 24.03.2016 um 01:20 schrieb Emre Besirik:
What I don’t get is; why do you think it is more cluttering when top-posting???
because in a technical discussion with several replies of different
peoples you need to find out what the response is taling about
you need to write much more text t
Because you can read it without scrolling, first thing you see is my response,
I also can clean-up previous mail clutter without needing to bottom-post?
not good enough for you? Sorry but your logic has no sense in it.
for every reason you guys give, I can give you opposite reason. (Which I did
Well then should I ignore people just because I don’t like how they write their
mails?
With your logic maybe hungry people in africa do not deserve to get free meals
because maybe they eat it with their hands maybe?
People with cancer do not deserve free healthcare maybe because they are
smoking
What I don’t get is; why do you think it is more cluttering when top-posting???
I just did top-postinghere and it is not cluttered?
I think this rule of yours from 80’s or 90’s where email clients are dumb
enough that they can not auto collapse?
Why should normal mails and list mails differ, its a
> they make it easier to follow what we're talking about.
Well, that's not usually a problem - usually we're talking about top-posting.
P
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Just a general comment: help from volunteers on this list using their own
free time is very much appreciated
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.03.2016 um 00:08 schrieb Emre Besirik:
>
>> Besides who actually tied something stupid as reply location to very v
Am 24.03.2016 um 00:08 schrieb Emre Besirik:
Besides who actually tied something stupid as reply location to very very
unrelated subject of respect? Thats where I get lost???
We can argue about usability of one opinion over the other all day but respect?
come on…
On the subject of usability;
Am 23.03.2016 um 23:54 schrieb Emre Besirik:
then you are only helping people if/when they obey you and your self imposed
rules?
surely, if you:
* press reply-all and break my reply-to-list button
* reply in a unreadable way
* reply in a way which makes it harder to follow the thread
* you
Am 23.03.2016 um 23:50 schrieb Emre Besirik:
BUT just please don’t make it look like its written in a holy book by god for
us to obey? Like a big sin to top-post, don’t, please… let people have their
own way
well, that people then can use Google and not bother others inbox by
seek for help
Am 23.03.2016 um 22:06 schrieb NoMercy:
Look now I'm replying over gmail and automatically does top-post by default
(just like many other mail clients)
my tunderbird does too - fine for business mails, but i am capable to
distinct between different mil type
This is not an evil thing? it i
Besides who actually tied something stupid as reply location to very very
unrelated subject of respect? Thats where I get lost???
We can argue about usability of one opinion over the other all day but respect?
come on…
On the subject of usability; I agree the usefullness of inline commenting tim
So providing free help gives these people right to impose their own rules to
other people? then correct me if I’m wrong but that doesn’t seem to completely
free to me? if what you are saying is true for everyone here, then you are only
helping people if/when they obey you and your self imposed r
I’m not saying it is impossible, it is by default top-post, as in apple mail
now I’m just typing this mail and in outlook with only these tree happens to
cover most likely more then 90% of the mail users population. most used = most
liked, most appreciated, easiest. designed like this top-post b
On 03/23/2016 01:27 PM, Emre Besirik wrote:
> Sorry but I cannot resist this antitop post’ing thing you keep
> telling to the people.
> I think
I stopped here, because it's where you are wrong. It doesn't matter one
whit what you think. It only matters what the people providing free
help on th
2016-03-23 22:06 GMT+01:00 NoMercy :
> Look now I'm replying over gmail and automatically does top-post by default
> (just like many other mail clients).
> This is not an evil thing? it is just how it is. you may not like it, but
> you also do not have right to impose your own rules to others?
>
Look now I'm replying over gmail and automatically does top-post by default
(just like many other mail clients).
This is not an evil thing? it is just how it is. you may not like it, but
you also do not have right to impose your own rules to others?
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Reindl Harald
Emre Besirik wrote:
>I think it is only you who for some reason hates to read
>top post mails and the rest of the worlds 99% of population
>doesn’t have any problems writing or reading from top or
>bottom?
I also really appreciate this highly sensitive rule. And I
disagree with you - and with the
first the top-post version of my response, have fun by find out to
*what* exactly i refer with every paragraph - maybe *now* you understand
the difference
that may be funny and not so difficult for this reply to your post only
in a longer thread where quotes from serveral people make a context
On 23 Mar 2016, at 18:32, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
> Please do not top-post here, it is considered rude.
>
> Carl Eugen
>
> ___
> ffmpeg-user mailing list
> ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Sorry but I cannot
Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes:
> $ ./configure --enable-libopenjpeg
> --extra_cflags="-DHAVE_OPEN_OPENJPEG_2_1_OPENJPEG_H"
>
> Now, from the ffmpeg -h command, it looks like openjpeg is
> used for encoding, while ffmpeg j2k is used for decoding.
This sounds very unlikely / command line and c
Sorry for spamming this group, but I finally figured this out - compile and
link work fine now:
$ ./configure --enable-libopenjpeg
--extra_cflags="-DHAVE_OPEN_OPENJPEG_2_1_OPENJPEG_H"
Now, from the ffmpeg -h command, it looks like openjpeg is used for
encoding, while ffmpeg j2k is used for de
I spoke too soon: compile is working, but linking fails. I guess I need
that check in the configure file after all
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> OK, figured this one out. Thanks to everyone who helped.
>
> Here is what I had to do:
>
> 1. Install latest OpenJPEG fr
OK, figured this one out. Thanks to everyone who helped.
Here is what I had to do:
1. Install latest OpenJPEG from source (version 2.1)
2. remove check for openjpeg library from configure script
3. $ ./configure --enable-libopenjpeg
--extra_cflags="-DHAVE_OPEN_OPENJPEG_2_1_OPENJPEG_H"
4. manually
On 3/23/16, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Reindl Harald
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 23.03.2016 um 14:22 schrieb Aaron Boxer:
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Reindl Harald
>>>
*where* doe soyur build install stuff?
nothing renames anything - path orders are
Am 23.03.2016 um 14:22 schrieb Aaron Boxer:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Reindl Harald
*where* doe soyur build install stuff?
nothing renames anything - path orders are relevant
in doubt *tell* ffmpeg where it has to seek!
--extra-ldflags may be your friend
I install OpenJPEG library i
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
> Am 23.03.2016 um 14:22 schrieb Aaron Boxer:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Reindl Harald
>>
>>> *where* doe soyur build install stuff?
>>>
>>> nothing renames anything - path orders are relevant
>>> in doubt *tell* ffmpeg where it
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 22.03.2016 um 21:33 schrieb Aaron Boxer:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Moritz Barsnick
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 16:11:37 -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
>>>
and configure was happy. But, libopenjpeg-dev is vers
Am 22.03.2016 um 21:33 schrieb Aaron Boxer:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 16:11:37 -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
and configure was happy. But, libopenjpeg-dev is version 1.5 of
OpenJPEG.
You need to have a newer Ubuntu or find a repository wi
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 16:11:37 -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> > and configure was happy. But, libopenjpeg-dev is version 1.5 of
> OpenJPEG.
>
> You need to have a newer Ubuntu or find a repository with openjpeg2, I
> guess:
>
> http://pack
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 16:11:37 -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> and configure was happy. But, libopenjpeg-dev is version 1.5 of OpenJPEG.
You need to have a newer Ubuntu or find a repository with openjpeg2, I
guess:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libopenjpeg-dev
"precise" and "trusty"
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 16:23:04 -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> I think the OpenJPEG library name has changed between 1.5 and 2.x
ffmpeg's configure should handle this:
enabled libopenjpeg && { check_lib openjpeg-2.1/openjpeg.h opj_version
-lopenjp2 -DOPJ_STATIC ||
Hi Reindl,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 22.03.2016 um 21:11 schrieb Aaron Boxer:
>
>> I would like to build FFmpeg with OpenJPEG 2.0. I've heard it is possible.
>> But, when I run configure with --enable-libopenjpeg, I get an error:
>>
>> ERROR: libopenjpeg no
Am 22.03.2016 um 21:11 schrieb Aaron Boxer:
I would like to build FFmpeg with OpenJPEG 2.0. I've heard it is possible.
But, when I run configure with --enable-libopenjpeg, I get an error:
ERROR: libopenjpeg not found.
Since I am on Ubuntu, I then installed
libopenjpeg-dev
and configure was
Dear FFmpeg'ers,
I would like to build FFmpeg with OpenJPEG 2.0. I've heard it is possible.
But, when I run configure with --enable-libopenjpeg, I get an error:
ERROR: libopenjpeg not found.
Since I am on Ubuntu, I then installed
libopenjpeg-dev
and configure was happy. But, libopenjpeg-dev
37 matches
Mail list logo
