[stuff about science vs art vs religion snipped]
Guys, I did an entire university year on theories of science, but this is a
list about film scanners.
Rob
(and I'll try not to pursue threads about printing either! ;)
Clark Guy wrote:
Hi, Art!
I wasn't going to get involved in this issue, but I vehemently disagree with
your assertion that
"Science is whatever the ruling scientist claim is true now. "
Out of respect for both the list owner and other members, those silent
as well as those whom
Hi!
I have updated my page after correcting some issues Ed Hamrick has pointed out.
The problem was that my pictures corrected by SCARSE was done for Adobe RGB
while the original scans were done using sRGB.
Regards
Erik Kaffehr
--
New email address please update your address
Hello Austin,
Sarcasm is tough to get passed through email. Especially tough for
an undereducated nincompoop.
Friday, November 10, 2000, 6:28:30 PM, you wrote:
I have a Nikon LS-30 and had NO IDEA that it would work with
Vuescan. I have no idea what vuescan is, but
So. has anyone else had similar problems with the SS4000?
My 1st one lasted about a year 2000+ scans before banding
problems began to show up in dark areas of some slides. The
replacement ss4k is fine so far (300 scans or so). The noises
they make are slightly different - maybe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Added "Device|Frame offset (mm)" option for Nikon
LS-30 and LS-2000 scanners. It's useful if you have
some leader on a film strip, or if you're scanning
panoramic film on these scanners.
Excellent! Now I'll have to buy the XPan...
shAf wrote:
Since you're both talking about lines screens, I'd guess yes.
Historically, the number is associated with angles between the
dot-pattern offsets, and the calculated best value is the root of 2
(1.414) ... but this is a minimum, and since 'more-cannot-hurt' was
rounded
Sorry for the stupid question.
I am not able to understand if I should scan at 64bit RGBI or at 48.
I am scanning with an LS-30 at 2700dpi .
My color space is BruceRGB.
The scans are managed by PS 5.5 .
Thanks.
Sincerely.
Ezio
www.lucenti.com e-photography site
After reading several comments about the speed of loading Photoshop 6, I
decided
to run a few simple comparisons. I am working with a 450 Mhz
"Home-brew" computer
with an ASUS P2B motherboard, 384 mb memory,5 Gb free on a 16 Gb hard
drive,
and Windows 98. With relatively few competing
To GOD?
My apologies - I inadvertently send my message to Filmscanners rather than
to the
Photoshop Discussion Group.
Stewart
Ezio writes ...
I am not able to understand if I should scan at 64bit RGBI or at 48.
I am scanning with an LS-30 at 2700dpi .
My color space is BruceRGB.
If you scan at 64bit, then you'll be able to save the raw scan
(64bit, including the IR channel), and then subsequently "crop" the
Stewart writes ..
...
P. S. My 6.0 causes a crash whenever I try to crop. I have been
in contact with Adobe Support and they haven't been able to
solve the problem; they have referred the problem
to a higher support level.
Ther has been a problem with early versions of your
13 matches
Mail list logo
