>Please , anybody having problems in downloading or succeeding in it ?
>
>I don't understand any more what's happening.
Just d/l it this morningno problems.
Paul
I downloaded successfully shortly after you posted
the WhaleMail Fwd: at 11:04 PM.
IronWorks
- Original Message -
From:
Ezio
To: Mystic ; Filmscanners
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 3:06
AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: Here's a
place...
Yes ... right click o
On Fri, 05 Jan 2001 17:25:21 -0800 OK Photo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something, it appears that you still
> need a purchased version of portfolio in order to make
> use of the free browser.
Certainly not with the version I have - MyPortfolio is a complete program, capable
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 20:03:47 +0100 Jan Copier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Nikon scanners have 6 lenses in 4 groups (L30-LS2000), why do not other =
> scanners mention this in their specs, is it because they do not have'm =
> and do not need them because they are enlarging their images by =
> int
On Sat, 06 Jan 2001 18:32:00 -0400 Terry Danks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Apparently! Now that I know what is happening, I can deal with it. It is
> relegated to being
> a rather minor nuisance. However, until it became clear what was going on, well
> . . . . getting a rocket to the moon wa
I downloaded it successfully from the WhaleMail
forward - thanks.
The first time I had tried before that forward
using just the website and the user ID and Password Seguace - I guess that was
for upload only.
IronWorks
- Original Message -
From:
Ezio
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
I've been doing a bit of research on the Kodak RFS 3600
film scanner, and found out a few interesting things.
It's actually made by Pacific Image Electronics, the
same company that makes the PrimeFilm 1800u film
scanner. The RFS 3600 is apparently just the next
generation of the PrimeFilm 1800u
> All CCD filmscanners use lenses to image the film onto the CCD.
You mean the CCDs AREN'T 8.5" wide?
Damn ;-)
Hi,
Well I'm quite new here and like to say hello to
everyone.
I'm looking for a good filmscanner but still don't
know witch one to take. It is important for me that the scanner use SCSI
interface, so I guess there are only 3 available .
Nikon LS 30 , Minolta scan elite and the new Cano
thanks
>Are the 'jaggies' perhaps related to the bit depth???
I don't think so; I think they are related more to resolution than bit
depth. The more ppi or dpi ( depending on what technocratic dictionary that
you use) the fewer jaggies up to a point.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael,
I have no argument with what you have said and in fact concur. My only additional
caveat is that when originally purchasing an item of digital equipment one has no way
of being sure in advance that it will have a serviceable lifespan of any length beyond
the immediate future no matte
HI all
Can someone please explain the process in PS to obtain the best from a raw
neg scan output from Vuescan. Is it simply a matter of Invert and Levels or
is there more to it? Or is it not possible to achieve the same results as a
processed scan?
I had never tried the raw scan option before a
Marc: I bought an LS-30 and Vuescan this summer. I use Vuescan for almost
all my scans, rather than Nikonscan. I have had very good, usable scans
from the LS-30. With Vuescan there have been no "Jaggies." The multipass
capability of the unit and Vuescan does tend to increase the dynamic range
Some guy dealing with professional scanners told me that even by minor
adjustments in Photoshop (changing colour, levels, contrast) you loose
information on colour of you file and as a result you get a lesser quality
file as compared to adjustments made with the scanner software in the
scanning pr
Luc: See my post to Marc Fogel, dated today, about the LS-30. You can
add the following to it that relates to your question(s).
The quality of the prints I have received from the LS-30 scans has
provided prints comprable to an original photo. I did a scan for a
friend of mine and he was able
Gordon implied that only the LS-30 has ICE, the Acer 2740S
also has ICE - see:
http://www.acercm.com/imaging/scanwit_ice.html
--- Gordon Tassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marc: I bought an LS-30 and Vuescan this summer. I use
> Vuescan for almost
> all my scans, rather than Nikonscan. I have
I'll put my two cents in for the Minolta Scan Elite... costs a little more
than the LS-30, but its specs are comparable to the more expensive LS2000
Nikon... the scans I get from 35mm neg Reala shot u8nder mixed light
conditions are great I have also scanned B/W and Kodachrome with
excellent r
Downloaded and installed last night. Works great. No problems.
Thanks much
Bob Kehl
- Original Message -
From: OK Photo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: Here's a place...
>
> >Please , anybody having
Richard writes ...
> Can someone please explain the process in PS to obtain
> the best from a raw neg scan output from Vuescan.
> Is it simply a matter of Invert and Levels or
> is there more to it? Or is it not possible to achieve the
> same results as a processed scan?
I'm a bit confus
Dear Eric,
I have the Canon FS2710 going fine on W2000 with its own SCSI card. It
wasn't quite straighforward, but with help from Alex on this list, it was sorted out.
The funny thing was that the Canon supplied SCSI card worked fine with my Microtek
flatbed on the same cable, bu
tomasz writes ...
> Some guy dealing with professional scanners told me that
> even by minor adjustments in Photoshop (changing colour, levels,
> contrast) you loose information on colour of you file and as a
result you get a
> lesser quality file as compared to adjustments made with the scanner
Richard,
I was able to save your image labelled "raw_scan" and rework it briefly in
Photoshop to look almost the same as your processed image. It required both
manual levels adjustment and some color balancing. I don't think there is
any problem with detail being burned out in the raw scan.
If y
How does the "Clean" option work in Vuescan with the Minolta Scan Dual II,
HP S20 and other scanners without Digital ICE.
Thank,
Marc
Hi Austin.
Austin Franklin wrote:
> > All CCD filmscanners use lenses to image the film onto the CCD.
>
> You mean the CCDs AREN'T 8.5" wide?
>
> Damn ;-)
LOL.
Mind you, Kodak's 14,400 pixel tri-linear sensor is 72 mm long, that's
pretty darn big as these things go.
I wonder if I could con the
Hi Marc.
"Marc S. Fogel" wrote:
> Hello,
> Has anyone used the Acer ScanWit 2740S?
Yes.
How can I put this?
If Acer do some work on the firmware and software, then it'll be adequate
for the money.
If they do some more work on the hardware, then it'll be good value.
If, as I supect, they do noth
In a message dated 1/8/2001 5:15:41 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> How does the "Clean" option work in Vuescan with the Minolta Scan Dual II,
> HP S20 and other scanners without Digital ICE.
Unfortunately, the Clean option just doesn't work very well without
the infrared channel of the Min
Hi Luc
Check out a few examples of scans from a Canoscan FS2710 here:
http://homepage.eircom.net/~ricwalsh/
If you would like a full res scan to print out as a test mail me and I'll
post one for download on my website.
--
Regards
Richard
//
| @ @ --->>> Richard <[EMAIL PRO
> Richard,
>
> I was able to save your image labelled "raw_scan" and rework it briefly in
> Photoshop to look almost the same as your processed image. It required both
> manual levels adjustment and some color balancing. I don't think there is
> any problem with detail being burned out in the raw
> Richard writes ...
>
>> Can someone please explain the process in PS to obtain
>> the best from a raw neg scan output from Vuescan.
>> Is it simply a matter of Invert and Levels or
>> is there more to it? Or is it not possible to achieve the
>> same results as a processed scan?
>
> I'm a bit
Hi Marc
I have a Scanwit and am very pleased with it. Had it for a year now and have used both
the supplied MiraPhoto software and Vuescan
to effect. It is sharp and the images coming out of it look great to me. I print up to
A3 with no worries. If you look at Tony's
site there is a section on
Sorry to be thick, but how would I temporarily remove myself from this fine
and informative list?
Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Unfortunately, the Clean option just doesn't work very well without
> the infrared channel of the Minolta Scan Elite, Nikon LS-30 and
> Nikon LS-2000. I hope to improve this, but it's hard to clean
> dust spots without an infrared channel without also losing image d
The
Polaroid SprintScan 4000 also uses a SCSI interface and I regularly make
stunning, photographic quality prints from my scans on an Epson 2000p
printer.
Frank Paris[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wouldn't this be true only for 8 bit scans?
Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of fotografia
> - tomasz zakrzewski
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 11:54 AM
>
Rob:
Thanks for the feedback -- that helps me a great deal in understanding how Vuescan
works.
Cheers!
--
--
-- Richard Drdul
-- Vancouver, BC, Canada
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
Richard,
I adjusted your scan in PS (both full image and detail combined in the same
image so that they received the same treatment) so that the full image
looked roughly the same as your processed image. Then you can see that the
detail ends up with the same degree of grain as your processed
I've just started scanning negs after many years of having my own darkroom.
I bought a Scanwit 2720S thinking for the $325 I paid for it, if I didn't
like the digital darkroom then I wouldn't have to much invested. I figured
I'd learn on the Scanwit then upgrade to a more respected scanner when I
> Why not to go for an upgrade of DISKS ... going to SCSI ... possibly
80MB/s
> or 160MB/s.
> 2 x 18GB SCSI Ultra160 IBM 10Krpm +
> 1 x 36GB SCSI U2 10Krpm (80MBs nominally).
> All of them are pumping 30MB/s EACH !
Disks are limited to their overall throughput because of the media transfer
rate f
Ezio wrote:
>My system is [snip] 2 x 18GB SCSI Ultra160 IBM 10Krpm
>All of them are pumping 30MB/s EACH !
>Moreover ... SCSI can let you have many I/O operation at the same time
on
>each unit and on several units ... IDE doesn't and the slowest IDE is
>arbitrating the clock of the channel.
I know
Hello Ed,
I believe I've found a little bug...
The LS-2000's Strip Film Holder fits into the slide adapter.
I'm scanning black-and-white negative film.
Vuescan will not let me change Mode from 35mm Slide
to anything else as long as the slide adapter is inserted
into the scanner.
With Media typ
B+H (www.bhphoto.com) has just added the eagerly-awaited Polaroid Sprintscan
120 to its web site. Price shown is MSRP, $3999.95. Not currently in stock
(of course) but expected late February.
Dave F.
The 3.9 dynamic range sounds unbelievable. I wonder how they achieve that?
Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Freedman
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 200
Title: filmscanners: but which printer is good enough?
Could be OT, but among filmscanners, maybe not:
In considering Epson 1160 vs 1200 vs 2000p, given the following:
1. 1160 has 4 colors and 4 picoliter droplets and can use bulk Generations pigments with CIS
1200 has 6 colors and 6 pi
on 1/8/01 9:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Pacific Image Electronics, the
> same company that makes the PrimeFilm 1800u
That summary of your research was very interesting. Thanks.
I read one review of the Pacific Image Electronics PrimeFilm 1800u (MacUser)
that was very
Tony Sleep wrote:
> ISTM that the problem is your flatbed's software messing with the SCSI .dll's, not
> the Polaroid 4000's Insight nor Vuescan.
There seems little doubt this was the problem. (Silverfast - as I haven't used
Insight much yet).
It has been solved thanks to my following the ins
46 matches
Mail list logo
