In a message dated 11/29/2001 9:38:28 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The stepper motor can actually move at 9600 dpi, which
is evenly divisible by both 4800 and 3200.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
When the stepper motor moves less than the optical resolution isn't
that just a software
Barbara wrote:
Well, I tried the magic marker along the edges, both on the
edges of the carrier, and on the carrier cover, also. Sorry
to say, it didn't work.
Wouldn't you need something matte - like a black matte paint for plastic
models? Magic marker ink might not take enough shine out of
This is really no mystery, it's just that the neg holders are fairly
thick, and somewhat reflective. This has always been a problem with
large format enlargers with their thicker neg holders, and easily
fixed. A little matte black paint around the inside edge of the
holder goes a long
Is there anyone one the list that could send me a sample exposed roll of
medium format 6x8. Not used in the US as far as I can tell. Some use in
Europe I think. Want to add it to the software.
Anyone who owns a Fuji GX680 would be shooting 6x8, and I believe there's
quite a few of them in
Hemingway, David J [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Thu, 29 Nov
2001 12:52:57 -0500
I would imagine one could develop a test that showed the differences but I
am not sure you would see that much difference on a practical basis.
This is between the 4000 and the 4000 + ? Would a reasonable person see
le 29/11/01 17:16, Ned Nurk à [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
i would doubt it - you can only buy it in packs of 5 here in the UK. T400CN
has replaced all the standard BW films that non specialist outlets used to
sell.
You're right, in France we also get Portra BW only in 5 rolls packs.
Best
Conclusion: If I will have a slow ,banding , and even slower scanner, if I
will get rid of the banding - my first choice is Nikon LS 8000.
Also add to the conclusion: a scanner who not can scan a film sharp over the
whole area ( if the film is not mounted in a glass frame).
Do I get this
It would make sense that some people would experience worse banding than
others if the information I received from several sources is correct.
Most scanners use a tri-line CCD sensor chip. In all scanners I know of
other than Nikon, this tri-line has filters over each line corresponding
to R
I'll leave others to comment of appropriate scanners for your needs. If
the SS4000 had a bulk loader, it would probably be perfect, but to my
knowledge that's still on the drawing board.
I do hope you plan of keeping your film image collection someplace where
it can be reasonably archived
I can give you my opinion on part of this comparison. I have a SS4000,
bought 2 years ago at $1425. A friend of mine recently purchased a SS120. I
scanned a couple of 35mm slides on his 120 that I had previously scanned on
my 4000. My 4000 scans look great, but the 120 scans shows significantly
Maybe a dumb question (I'm tired).. :-)
Why does my image change so dramatically between white point 0.001 and
0? When tweaking white point, I find I get small useful changes down to
0.001, but if I try to go lower or to zero, the image suddenly drops VERY
dramatically in brightness/gamma.
In a message dated 11/30/2001 7:22:44 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Why does my image change so dramatically between white point 0.001 and
0?
It's a bug - zero was being treated as the same as setting
Color|Color balance to None. I've fixed this, and will
release it in 7.2.11.
I would think they need the cash. I would say that they deserve
their current financial situation in this regard.
I have nothing to do with Polaroid except that I own a SS4000. I'm shocked
to read this and I feel the need to respond. The financial situation you are
talking about, chapter 11
Ed,
could you tell us some of your impressions about the Minolta Multi Pro when
testing it for your software - what about overall sharpness, shadow noise
etc. A lot of people out there seem to be interested in getting some well
founded impressions of the scanners quality by someone who has seen
Title: How do I pull shadow detail from
Nikon4000
For some reason, I can't adjust any of
the setting in the Nikonscan software to pull out shadow detail at
1-4x. I can't endure the 16x scanning times. Even if I
adjusted the black points, it made no difference.
Do I need to use Vuescan or is
Hi folks
What optical resolution does offer the Minolta multi software for 24x65
negs?
If low, could the optical system be turned to max (4800dpi) by Vuescan,
like Ed made in the old Minolta MF?
Might be a good alternative for XPan users...
Thanks and best regards
Didier
In a message dated 11/30/2001 10:56:43 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
What optical resolution does offer the Minolta multi software for 24x65
negs?
If low, could the optical system be turned to max (4800dpi) by Vuescan,
like Ed made in the old Minolta MF?
You can scan 24 x 65
Title: How do I pull shadow detail from Nikon4000
More RAM
Richard Corbett
- Original Message -
From:
Andy Darlow
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 3:19
PM
Subject: filmscanners: How do I pull
shadow detail from Nikon4000
For some
Any chance the SW can be made to scan 6x10? I just
aquired a Brooks Veriwide, whose image is 56x92.
Definitely not a common size (7 shots per roll of
120).
Pat
--- Hemingway, David J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyone one the list that could send me a
sample exposed roll of
medium
In a message dated 11/30/2001 9:20:31 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
could you tell us some of your impressions about the Minolta Multi Pro when
testing it for your software - what about overall sharpness, shadow noise
etc. A lot of people out there seem to be interested in getting some
Andy writes ...
For some reason, I can't adjust any of the setting in the
Nikonscan software to pull out shadow detail at 1-4x. I can't
endure the 16x scanning times. Even if I adjusted the black
points, it made no difference.
Do I need to use Vuescan or is there another way?
Trying
Ronald writes ...
Can someone tell me what exactly is the difference between
the LS-2000 and supercoolscan 2000? ... Or is it merely
a model change when they changed the firmware (which seems to
be upgradeable according to what I see on Nikon's web site)?
The firmware has always been
In a message dated 11/30/2001 12:06:42 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Can someone tell me what exactly is the difference between
the LS-2000 and supercoolscan 2000?
They're exactly the same thing. Nikon's marketing name is
Super CoolScan 2000, but it's also called the LS-2000.
Pat,
Early next year we will be coming out with 6 x 17 panoramic support for the
SS120. I would think this would due the trick. There will be a glass holder
released to handle the 9 x 17 as well as any other odd formats.
Regards
David
-Original Message-
From: Pat Perez [mailto:[EMAIL
David:
With the glass holders, will there be any problems with newton rings?
Barbara
Barbara White/Architectural Photography
http://www.barbarawhitephoto.com
Lloyd,
The SS4000+ will be selling for less than the prices you mentioned although
not for the current SS4000 price. Hope that will take some of the sting away
but frankly I don't own anything electronic that is not worth a mere
fraction of what I paid for it two years ago.
If you sold you
Cybis,
Point well taken. For what its worth, I too have suffered downsizing and ,
you're right, it ain't fun. I apologize for the last sentence in that
paragraph. I certainly don't believe the employees of Polaroid deserve their
current situation, least of all David. I was thinking more of the
The petition has been received and is being acted on!
David
-Original Message-
From: Todd Flashner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 2:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: filmscanners: to David Hemingway: SS120 Reflections at
scan borders
I was thinking of trying a Qtip dipped in acetone and run it along the two
vertical edges.
David
-Original Message-
From: Barbara White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 12:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:filmscanners: SS120: Reflections on
There should not be as we are using Newton free glass as one of the two
pieces. Why only one is Newton free I frankly don't know but I am told that
is all that is necessary.
David
-Original Message-
From: Barbara White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 2:07
Bravo! Your support is exemplary!
I hope they pay you well. ;-)
Todd
The petition has been received and is being acted on!
David
This is really no mystery, it's just that the neg holders are fairly
thick, and somewhat reflective. This has always been a problem with
large format
- Original Message -
From: Ronald Vyhmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can someone tell me what exactly is the difference between the LS-2000 and
supercoolscan 2000? It looks like it may be the best deal to move my
slide
collection to digital form... It appears they can both use the same
Point well taken. For what its worth, I too have suffered downsizing and
,
you're right, it ain't fun. I apologize for the last sentence in that
paragraph. I certainly don't believe the employees of Polaroid deserve
their
current situation, least of all David. I was thinking more of the CEO,
Andy Darlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do I need to use Vuescan or is there another way?
You might as well give Vuescan a try. What film are you scanning - is there
an obvious reason why it is very dense? Like Velvia, K25, Provia 100F?
Rob
Dear All,
I regret the filmscanners list will temporarily be suspended whilst it is
moved to another server.
This was supposed to happen 23:00 tonight, but I am at the mercy of my ISP
and they may turn it off at any time today, tomorrow, who knows... they
don't seem to.
Mail sent to the
Based on results with my LS-30, Vuescan now provides essentially everything
that ICE3 advertises in any scanner with an IR channel.
Hersch
At 01:34 PM 11/30/2001 -03-30, you wrote:
Ronald writes ...
Can someone tell me what exactly is the difference between
the LS-2000 and supercoolscan
-Original Message-
From: Robert Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:reflections on the carrier?
Could you post this as I am digest-subscribed:
Well now I am not so sure I am seeing what I am seeing.
Were you working for LH by any chance? My stock went from $40 US/share
to a few cents per share, if that. The employees aren't the only one's
who suffer in a business failure.
Art
Cybis wrote:
I would think they need the cash. I would say that they deserve
their current financial
I can think of very few computers or their peripherals that keep their
value over a two year period. Video cards, memory, hard drives, flatbed
scanners, digital cameras, CD-R burners all have tumbled tremendously in
price. Software is a bigger joke when it comes to resale. I probably
couldn't
There should not be as we are using Newton free glass as one of the two
pieces. Why only one is Newton free I frankly don't know but I am told that
is all that is necessary.
David
Newton rings are an interference cancellation from light trying to
get through two transparent but reflective
40 matches
Mail list logo
