-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Sleep
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 8:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: was: RE: SS4000 ...now: mean people suck
Personally I read George's complaint as being about untrimmed posting,
not on Laurie's
in the 64
bit version. :-) Vista also has a Professional Edition in both the 32 bit
and 64 bit versions.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gary
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 3:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: SS4000
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Sleep
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: SCSI support on a Mac Pro
On 11/02/2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Evidently, this adapter/converter still is on the market
a total revision of the program from start to finish;
instead, they would only issue service packs that fix bugs or security
problems, leaving the addition or alteration of features to the next OS.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gary
Sent
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 2:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] SCSI support on a Mac Pro
I currently am using my Polaroid SprintScan 4000 on a Windows computer
with an installed SCSI card.
I am about
.
-Albert Einstein
___
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate
pitch would be optimal.
http://www.lazygranch.com/groom_lake_birds.htm
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest
need high spatial frequency, scintillation pretty much
wipes out resolution at that distance. Great job though! I am
surprised and impressed at the detail you captured at that distance.
Jim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a Tak FS78 and quite a few accessories for such antics, but you
can't use
major disagreement.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Jackson
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 9:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography
On Jul 4, 2007, at 6:37 PM, [EMAIL
concerning grain and grain
structure in an image.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David J.
Littleboy
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 12:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography
Rob,
Actually, the Olympus stuff does know what lens is on the camera and
can be set to compensate.
Is that only for Olympus brand lenses or does it apply to third party lenses
like Sigmas and the like?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
how flat they may be they certainly will be effected to one degree or
another by the optics of the lens in the digital camera or scanner in the
case of CDD scanners.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gary
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 8:29
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Jackson
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 3:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography
On Jul 4, 2007, at 11:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the DSLRs
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
Kersenbrock
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 5:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Secondly, some artifacts produced in the scanning process
dealing with when processing a Camera RAW file in a
Camera RAW application.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Jackson
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 7:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 6:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To put it simply, when you capture an image with a DSLR camera, you
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gary
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 7:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography
I don't have a DSLR, but wouldn't a raw camera image need to be, shall
we say, dematrixed
___
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
, and the scanning of the
film will comprise the equivalent of a second generation capture with the
possible introduction of noise, artifacts, and other degrading components
during the scan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 9:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS30 Vista
You're right Charles my Adaptec card hasn't got vista support, thanks
for
the link
until I've finished.
David.
- Original Message -
From: Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 10:49 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS30 Vista
Can you use Vuescan, which seems to have gotten around the SCSI api and
OS issue?
Art
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 10:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS30 Vista
I use a Minolta Dimage 5400 II running under X64 (precursor to Vista).
It is USB
. It is the source of all true art
and science.
-Albert Einstein
___
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe
-Included Message--
Date: 9-Jun-2007 01:06:25 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography
(I think the
objective consensus would settle on a 10mp equivalence
with my F3 due to the
ability to put a magnifier on the screen. I'm trying to convert my EOS
film body to that task, but the removable prism is such an advantage.
[I'm really getting tired of fixing the old F3, and I think now Nikon
won't refurb it.]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually I don't think
___
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
___
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
___
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
___
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
it?
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
in :-).
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
efficient filling system that keeps dust from being a problem?
Charles
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message
by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
.
They both yield good scans. Nevertheless, I continue to wait for the
perfect scanner) ;-)
Joyfully, -david soderman-
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners
keep my eyes peeled for the next MF Nikon scanner.
Joyfully, -david soderman-
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest
We will be unable to answer email until late Sunday.
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
Didn't use the Canon. Used the Kodak. Stay away from it
The scanner is not good. First of all, there is no way to get 10 bits per
second as the scanner claims it it. It always comes out 8bits/channel. That
is not good. Also, the histogram looks terrible after you get the image.
There are
I am thinking about upgrading from the default silverfast version that came
with my SS 4000. I scan mostly negatives. Do you think the upgrade is worth
the $45?
Also, I heard there was a free upgrade for SS4000 customers. Is this true?
thanks!
-e
I shot some pictures this weekend using t400CN color bw film and it was
very overcast (I live in Portland, OR)!
I am trying to scan them with my Polaroid SS 4000, using Vuescan,
Silverfast, and Insight.
a) Because it was a overcast days, the light was great for details, but it
was also flat,
The coupon at Ecost.com and pcmall seems like it is generic. Can I buy it
from, say Cameraworld.com and use the same coupon? No other place has the
rebate coupon.
evrim
Is there a way to get 12 bits out of this scanner? The histogram looks not
very smooth. Also did anybody else had problem with the ofocusing of this
scanner? My negatives stored in sleeves is pretty flat, but still i get
softscans. What is your methodology for getting sharp scans with this
:52:18 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yesterday I was experimenting with fill flash (still haven't gotten it
completely down yet) and decided to go w/neg film for it's
extra latitude.
Kodak Royal Gold 100, to be exact. A bit contrasty, but I like it.
The scans coming out of the SS
issue...
Is this a common problem? I can scan negs on the Scan Dual II and the
dreaded ES-10S and have decent output, but the SS (which is the best scanner
I've used to date) seems to almost ignore the neg masking.
Any ideas or do this, you silly guy comments?
TIA!
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John,
I have no experience with the SilverFast software but absolutely LOVE
Vuescan for trannies, at least. I'm an experienced scanner but new to the
SS4000 myself.
I've spent $40 on far less useful things. :) Hamrick software has a full
featured demo you can d/l from www.hamrick.com that you
Frank, the biggest single improvement in my photo
technique these last couple of years was giving
up on generic ISO 200 negative films.
I took a different approach...I use MF. I can shoot Tri-X till the cows come home,
developed D-76 1:1, and they look very good IMO. I know that's BW,
on 2/6/01 11:13 AM, Austin Franklin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you shoot it at, and what do you develop it at? I routinely make
13x19 prints from scanned Plus-X (35mm that is, much less 120), and unless
you take a 6x loupe to the print, you wouldn't see anything looking like grain
How are you going to see ANYTHING on a crappy web image
at 72DPI? I do not believe that would be useful at all.
The JPEG may load with a res setting = 72ppi, but
the bitmap of pixels will be the same as if the res had
be defined at 300ppi. Julie only needs to "re-define"
the
47 matches
Mail list logo
