Tony Sleep wrote:
>
> I still use the original Ricoh RO-1420C SCSI CDR I bought 5 years ago,
> originally in a 486, and a mere 2x write speed. Used with Gear s/w from
> Elektroson which has some clever buffering arrangements but a Martian UI, it
> has never produced a single coaster on any
Dicky wrote:
> It all depends on the purpose for which the scanner was purchased.
> High end drum scanners such as the Hell, Dainippon or Crosfield, remove
> scratches by mounting the original in a glycerine solution. Dust is removed
> at the picture editing stage, post scanning.
> The reason
Lynn Allen wrote:
>>> Ed Hamrick is smarter than the software developers employed >>by the
>>
> scanner manufacturers.
>
>
>> And he listens to his customers!
>
>
> It would definitely be nice if we could A)clone Ed, or B)get more
> programmers to review The Filmscanners List.
>
1) Eithe
My god, the guy even works on this during his vacation!
(Either that or he has a bunch of programmers locked in his basement,
and he's been ghosting their work for years!)
Art
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just released VueScan 6.7.2 for Windows, Mac OS and Linux.
> It can be downloaded from:
Yes, I know this is another off-topic posting, but I'm sure more than a
few of you will be interested in this.
It apparently turns out that the Epson 870/890/1270 printers with the
chipped cartridges work by reading the cartridge info once upon
installation, then that info is sent to the comp
Austin Franklin wrote:
>> It apparently turns out that the Epson 870/890/1270 printers with the
>> chipped cartridges work by reading the cartridge info once upon
>> installation, then that info is sent to the computer and then software
>> is used to keep track of the ink levels until t
Tony Sleep wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 19:39:41 -0800 Arthur Entlich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>
>> Doesn't this speak volumes about where one finger can be pointed.
>> Thanks for this, I'm gonna track down Gears.
>
>
> www.gearcdr.com - but be
I don't think anyone will argue that for now, drum scanners have the
edge in the digital scanning arena. I also don't think many would argue
that CCD scanners are being successfully used to scan 35mm frames used
in the coffee table glossy book market, with considerable success.
For those who
Frank Paris wrote:
> If the information is not sent back to the computer, then how does the
> computer give a visual display of the amount of ink remaining in each
> cartridge? In fact, the computer is sent this information continuously as a
> print is being made, because I can watch the graphs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I'm pretty new to this list, but could do with advice. I'm looking for a
> film scanner that won't break the bank (aren't we all) and it's come
> down to the Acer Scanwit 2720 as it's a great price, BUT I like Nikon
> stuff, is the LS30 really a better
At the risk of getting a black eye: I have just received info that a
Chip reprogrammer will shortly be available for Epson Chipped carts for
$20 and the chip can be moved to other carts containing different inks
(like archival).
I smell a law suit. If anyone wishes to discuss this further,
Dicky wrote:
> Actually I have every confidence in the abilities of the man camera
> manufacturers to produce the totally automated and independent self
> operational camera before the next decade is out.
>
> "What does that mean squire?" I hear you ask...
> well what it means my son is that
Dieter Henkel wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I hope this question wasn't asked ten times before and if so please
> answer me privately.
> I bought a Minolta Dimage Scan Elite and installed it on my computer
> running Windows 2000. It works very well apart from the annoying fact
> that each time I sta
> Mr Wilkinson PLEASE!
> Everyone likes to talk futures, it's fun and what's more it costs nothing,
> and what's even more, anyone can do it.
>
> Soothsaying has been with us always and always will be with us.
> Just remember...soothsayers never make money because they never guess right
> ofte
I haven't owned of used one. You are right about the specs. The
complaints (and there have been quite a few) is that the software is
very problematic. I think Kodak just slashed the price on it, as well.
The other thing about Kodak, as a company, that I'd watch out for is this:
They tend t
A few ideas. Someone mentioned the anti-static wipes, there is also
something called Kimwipes which are for darkroom use. There is also
made a anti-static brush (although I'm not recommending it due to
radiation issues, (which created a long debate before, so I'm not going
into it again)).
IronWorks wrote:
> Try PEC-12 or Kodak film cleaner and/or some compressed air. The dust on
> the just-processed film may be the processor's doing in running the film
> through their machine or in handling it afterward. If it's bad enough you
> may be wise to try another film processor.
>
>
Dicky wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Michael Wilkinson"
>> keep smiling
>
>
> "When your smiling...
> when your smiling
> the whole..
> world..
> smiles...
> with-you".
>
> Richard Corbett - the singing amateur
Don't quit you day job ;-)
Art
Michael, this sounds interesting. Only one question. I have some tacky
silicone "filters" which stick to the glass of my skylight filter (they
are not optically pure, BTW, they have defraction grating etched into
them for special effects like rainbow color bursts around bright light
sources
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There are a lot of very serious professional B/W photographers out
> there who would utterly disagree with that statement. Personally I LOVE
> Tri-X it's gritty grainy and ultra sharp (and oddly I prize sharpness
> above all else). One of the things I disliked ab
Berry Ives wrote:
> on 2/24/01 9:00 AM, Tony Sleep at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:08:18 -0700 Berry Ives ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> 4. I had a lot of trouble trying to get neutral gray in the background
>>> out-of-focus area of one image (Fuji S400)
Tony Sleep wrote:
>
> Along with the advantages of the easy, lossless reproduceability of
digital has
> come the biggest threat of all: clients demanding all rights forever,
usually
> for no extra fee, in order to exploit the photographs (and the
photographer)
> more thoroughly.
If arti
Tony Sleep wrote:
> And if you really want to get depressed, the next phase is e-publishing instead
> of print. I think that's totally inescapable as the web becomes ubiquitous and
> wireless PDA technology evolves. At that point the newsagents, printers and
> distributors join us in the do
This is an off topic request. I am try to get "my affairs in order",
which includes trying to get my CD-RWs labeled with what is on them.
Apparently, the authors of WIN95, and maybe later versions, didn't
consider a capability that I had on my Commodore 64 computer, that of
the ability to pri
Hi Bob,
And thanks. This is being suggested to me by several people in private
mail, and it may ultimately be the answer. Silly to have to go this
route, but it IS Windows, after all ;-)
It really makes me wonder how people can ask $10-20 shareware fees for
the programs I downloaded from ZD
Dear Richard,
Thanks for the creative idea. I think its a bit too involved to deal
with on so many disks needed to be done. I hope I can find a more
direct route... but with Windows, who knows?
Art
Richard wrote:
> Art
> Just a thought, I'm Mac based and cant remember how the PC displays f
hing near what LP art paid.
Art
Gordon Tassi wrote:
> They will switch to doing graphics for Web Sites, CD graphics that accompany the mp3
> audio, and other forms of e-commerce. In fact, some photographers and graphic
> artists are already doing that.
>
> Gordon
>
> Ar
Yes, and I will answer you in private mail about this common problem, to
not further antagonize anyone here.
Art
Bill Grimwood wrote:
> Yesterday while printing with my Epson Photo EX the printer started
> printing black lines across the print into the margin on the paper. In
> about three ye
I want to thank everyone who made suggestions to me on a method for
printing the directories from my CD-Rs. There were a number of unique
and creative methods offered, and several downloads.
I ended up using a little program suggested called FolderPrint32.zip.
It isn't perfect, in that it onl
patton paul wrote:
> The new Nikon and Minolta scanners use USB rather than SCSI to communicate
> with the computer. Since USB has a lower data transfer rate than SCSI, I
> was wondering wether this makes any difference for the overall amount of
> time needed to complete a scan. Is data trans
Austin Franklin wrote:
> "FTP Error: 550
> Access denied - No such file or directory.
> Path /pub/adobe/magic/photoshop/win/6.x/photoshop601up.exe doesn't exist or
> you don't have permission to use this file."
>
> That's what happens when I try to access that file. The FTP directory
> listin
Marvin Demuth wrote:
> As I prepare for scanning for these size prints, it will help me, and I
> suspect others, if some of you scanning for quality 8.5 x 11 and 13 x 17
> prints from 35mm in either b & w or color will comment on:
>
> 1. The typical file sizes you use at the printing stage and
There is a big difference between halftoning and dithering. Most of the
printers we use, inkjet, home laser printers, etc, use dithering.
Halftoning involves having each ink color screened into dots and then
each of these dots is further matrixed to create different color
density. So the cya
Austin Franklin wrote:
>> ... that dot
>> from your printer can only be one of at test a dozen colors. In most
>> cases ... the printer can only place on dot of
>> each color in it's cartridges on any one spot. So, a CMYK printer, can,
>> for instance, place a C, CM, CY, CK, CMY, CMK, M, MY,
u=62684
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 7:23 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: filmscanners: File sizes,
Austin Franklin wrote:
> I do find
> it fascinating that some people have adopted a, in my book, 'new' term for
> 'this'. Kind of like changing the word CPU...
I'm unfamiliar with the "word" CPU... It isn't in my dictionary either.
There is a C.P.U., an acronym for a central processing unit
Laurie Solomon wrote:
> Frank,
> Try The Chicago Art Museum or Chicago Museum of Art. :-)
>
> The artwork you speak of is truly amazing as are most of Seurat's other
> works. This same painting, I believe, was also utilized as the backdrop and
> the basis for a play on Seurat.
>
I too have
Austin Franklin wrote:
>> There is a big difference between halftoning and dithering. Most of the
>> printers we use, inkjet, home laser printers, etc, use dithering.
>>
>> Halftoning involves having each ink color screened into dots and then
>> each of these dots is further matrixed to creat
Jules wrote:
> anyone here use digimarc's photoshop plugin to embed a digital watermark in
> your images before displaying them on the web?
>
> well, as if you do you may be aware that digimarc suddenly decided to charge
> everyone for watermarking 100+ images (an anual fee) last year, now the
Austin Franklin wrote:
>
> I know, I know! I've had this discussion with a number of monitor designers
> over the years...and it drives them nuts that people call it 'resolution'.
> I don't remember what they did call it though...I'll go look it up if I
> still have the thread saved.
>
A l
Sara Jane Boyers wrote:
> It was primarily because of a visit to Paris while in college and my
> first real view of the great impressionist paintings (particularly
> Monet's "Parlement") at the Jeu des paumes that I switched my major from
> political science to art history, took up photogra
Austin Franklin wrote:
... that dot
from your printer can only be one of at test a dozen colors. In most
cases ... the printer can only place on dot of
each color in it's cartridges on any one spot. So, a CMYK
>>>
>> printer, can,
>>
for instance, place a C, CM, CY,
Wanna here my new Bill Gates/MS joke?
When the earthquake started to shake in Redmond, Bill shouted "Quick,
tape the windows, tape the windows!", and the MS personnel all ran
around backing up their computers.
I thought it was interesting that one employee who was interviewed at
the meeting t
Austin Franklin wrote:
> I am curious how you know they (let's say the Epson printers)
>> print more
>>
> than one dot at any one 'point' on the paper, ie, the CM, CY
Let's call it empirical observation.
>>>
>>> I asked 'the power that knows for sure' and he said
Experience with hardware is, of course, a great help in providing sage
advice. My only caveat is that the high tech industry gets traded more
often than chips in a poker game, and information a few years old can be
based upon a past incarnation of a company.
In the recent example, NEC was onc
Leo Stachowicz wrote:
>
>
> So as a first scanner I've decided to buy the LS-4000 and have also been
> trying to find somewhere to get it from.
It never hurts to make your first choice the right one, and in all
likelihood the Nikon LS4000 will be stellar. However, I'd wait for a
few revi
One further consumer suggestion. If at all possible, try to get the
store to agree to handle any warranty repairs for you (I'm not
suggesting they do the repair, but that they handle shipping back and
forth) Monitors are both expensive to ship, and vulnerable to damage,
and sometimes the rep
Shough, Dean wrote:
It sure beats
> talking about CD-Rs and printers. Most of my comments just reiterate what
> others have already told you, but it never hurts to repeat good ideas.
>
Obviously, the revamping of Vuescan is of great interest to many on the
list here, which explains all
Collin Ong wrote:
>
>
> But, now dust will settle on the exposed flat surface of the other frames
> on the strip! This is such a problem with the Minolta Scan Dual II that I
> turned that scanner sideways to avoid dust problems!
>
> Collin
You've got some dust problem there! How does the
IronWorks wrote:
> Is a PC100 chip sufficient for Win2K? Microsoft's site recommends the PC133
> minimum.
>
> Another possibility for some might be a dual boot system with 98SE and also
> 2K.
>
> Maris
>
Does Win 2K require a 133mHz motherboard bus? Can WIN 2K run on a
Celeron system CPU
Austin Franklin wrote:
> The right tools for the job. Having a 'resolution' of at least 1280x1024 is
> not untypical for most people who do image editing. In fact, I'd bet most
> on this list have 1600 x 1200.
>
I'd bet you are wrong. Most people are using 17" monitors these days,
which i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 3/7/2001 5:50:02 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
>> Read an interesting article about Applied Science Fiction's ROC
>> technology of restoring color of old pictures, indicating that it makes
>> its restoration on the basis of distinct patt
Collin Ong wrote:
> I believe that the main culprit is the totally nonsensical scan order, as
> you pointed out. The SDII scans frames from out to in, which maximizes
> the time the frames spend exposed to the environment. Combine that with
> the fact that the scan direction for each frame i
Hi John,
I read the same article, and no, it doesn't require an IR channel. Both
ROC and GEM can be added to any scanner via software, but it does
require, as I understand it, that it is customized to the scanner.
The results shown in the article samples were nothing short of
miraculous, or
Robert Kehl wrote:
> Well if you think you're puzzled, I'm really puzzled. Why would anyone use
> anything but the highest resolution available for scanning and viewing
> images created with high resolution devices such as filmscanners.
>
> Unless your scanning at 72 dpi from a flatbed for us
Mark T. wrote:
>
> Sorry to give you the bad news, but if you surf around with java/javascript
> on, site counters will gather the following information and report it back
> to the site owner:
> - Your browser and version no.
> - Your operating system
> - Your resolution and color depth
> - You
Frank Paris wrote:
> All of that can be handled, since you can specify large icons, etc.
>
> Frank Paris
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
>
Does using "large icons" also increase menu and tool sizes within a
program, like Photoshop? Inquiring minds wa
Austin Franklin wrote:
>> Most people who never used one are confused completely about what
>> Amiga was.
>> No, it wasn't a grown-up Atari,
>
>
> Hardware/architecture wise it sure was. The Atari was the first such
> machine to have custom processors (four) designed specifically to han
Collin Ong wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Arthur Entlich wrote:
>
>> Collin Ong wrote:
>>
>>> I believe that the main culprit is the totally nonsensical scan order, as
>>> you pointed out. The SDII scans frames from out to in, which maximizes
>>
Laurie Solomon wrote:
>> Most people are using 17" monitors these days,
>> which is the sweet spot in the pricing structure right now
>
>
> Not in my neck of the woods. Actually, at least where I live, 19" monitors
> are the current popular models and tend to be the sweet spot in terms of
> p
Michael Wilkinson wrote:
> Hi Eli,
> We have been dual booting utilising separate hard drives between NT4 and
> Win 2k.
> Its not caused any problems to date and enables us ,as you rightly
> mention,to run "Old" peripherals successfully.
> With Ram prices so low I can not understand why everyo
Please do run a survey, and post the results. I'll happily admit I'm
wrong if I am.
Until 12 months ago, I ran my system on a 13-14" monitor (we use
different measurements in Canada, they are based upon the visible
display rather than the size of the CRT) originally running 640 x 480,
then mo
Robert Kehl wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Arthur Entlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 9:18 PM
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
>
>
>
>>
>> You
Rob Geraghty wrote:
> Art wrote:
>
>> Does Win 2K require a 133mHz motherboard bus? Can WIN 2K run on a
>> Celeron system CPU which uses a 66mHz bus?
>
>
> Win2K doesn't require any particular bus speed. It's just a Microsoft recommendation
> - making sure you buy upgrades from their frie
Rick Berk wrote:
> Hey Ed-
> I just got the Kodak RFS 3600, and was interested in giving Vuescan a try,
> but I went to the website and was hoping to see some screen shots or
> something... any chance you could add some? I'd just like to know what I can
> expect... Also, does anyone have any ex
Frank Paris wrote:
>> Oh, did I mention your monitor will probably burn out sooner at that
>> screen mode?
>
>
> Why? Because it's running at a higher frequencies? That's like saying a 33
> Mhz Pentium will last longer than a 900 MHz Pentium III.
Well, it just might, actually ;-)
What I'v
Quoton wrote:
> No problem with my old machine with PC-100 memory. I don't believe it will
> have any problem with PC-66 systems. But honestly Pc-66 systems are very SLOW
> comparing to PC-133 systems.
>
> Quoton
My Mainboard is 133 bus, but at the time I bought it and put my system
togethe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Now for something completely different:
> what is the difference between the Scan Dual II and Scan Dual II White? Both
> come up after a search of cdnet and znet, with the White version being about
> $50 more. It may be the Genuine Fractals software, but I'm not s
Laurie Solomon wrote:
> My neck is located in East Central Illinois. If you look at all the
> pre-packaged systems advertised in the newspapers and in catalogs, they are
> offered with 17" monitors with 19" being the upgrade; but they have been
> changing to making 19" monitors the standard mo
Laurie Solomon wrote:
> One possible response might be that some people keep the working image
> on the primary monitor and the original image along with the palettes
> and tool bars on the secondary monitor. This original image is used as
> a comparative reference when making changes to th
Quoton wrote:
> If your mainboard is 133MHz capable you really should take all the
> advantage of it now. My Minolta scanner took nearly 2 minutes to scan
> a 35mm frame at full resolution on my pC-100 system (dual 550MHz CPU,
> 512MB PC-100 SDRAM) but with my newly assembled 933MHz single CPU
Once again, everything you say is likely true in the United States of
Waste and Consumption, but it sure isn't true here in Western Canada,
and I bet it also isn't true in Europe, Australia, and most other places.
Art
Mike Kersenbrock wrote:
> Arthur Entlich wrote:
>
>
Umax tended to be stingy with bit depth when it was expensive to
provide. Often their scanners would list something like
Bit Depth: 36 bit*
*-B.E.T., using the patented Bit Enhancement Technology in hardware
(actual bit depth 30 bit)
They ultimately were forced to stop doing this as a class
Austin Franklin wrote:
>>
>> Actually, you are both right, and wrong.
>
>
> OK, Arthur, nothing you said contradicted anything in my statement, so I
> don't get where I was "wrong".
I thought it would be beneficial for you to see the word "wrong", so
you'd recognize it, in the very unlike
I don't like being a rumor monger, nor creating a self fulfilling
prophecy, and one knows that memory prices are a bit like the stock
markets, but I have heard through a fairly reliable source that one of
the plants in Korea is about to shut down, and this might cause memory
prices to rise (f
Lynn Allen wrote:
>
> You guys are just lucky you can joke about it in your native tongues! ;-)
>
> LRA-USofA
>
That would be "Oh, Canada, our home and native tongues"... ;-)
Unfortunately, I don't speak Inuit, or any other aboriginal dialect.
Art
Lynn Allen wrote:
>> I believe the United States should take over western Canada and bring you
>
> guys up to speed.
>
> We tried that once, and they burned down Washington, D.C.
> Come to think of it, that's not such a bad idea! You guys got any matches
> left, Art? ;-)
>
All I have, in re
Frank Paris wrote:
>
> I believe the United States should take over western Canada and bring you
> guys up to speed. And don't tell me about waste and consumption. I know what
> your government has done to some of the canyons in B.C.: logged out all the
> timber, then scraped the bottom down
Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) wrote:
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
>>
>> Don't you mean "it turns out to be real... expensive... to get that spec
>> out of it ;-)
>>
>> I wasn't planning on spending t
Bob Armstrong wrote:
> Art wrote:
>> Rick,
>>
>> ...download the full program free of charge and not only see screen
>> shots, but play with it and see how it works. The only difference
>> between the version you are getting, and the one for $40, is that for
>> $40 you get a serial number th
Stuart wrote:
>
> What !!- u mean there are other countries in the world apart from
> America -well blow me down .
> Stuart (Scotland )
I have read of rumors for years about this... do you mean there might be
some truth to this, or is it just another "Nessy" story?
Art
Mark Crabtree wrote:
He's says that the
> Mirage II has a moving head like the 3000. I've read everything I can find
> about this scanner, but had never seen mention of that. If true, it would
> be so awkward for dealing with my long prints and negs, that I think it
> would ofset the convenien
Bill, If you are using the Plextor 12X writer, it has "Burnproof" built
into the hardware, which gives it capabilities most other drives
do not have. Burnproof, a Sanyo design, allows for the drive to prevent
buffer underruns by being able to relocate the point where the disk
stopped writing,
Khalid Javed wrote:
> I have recently bought a Nikon LS2000 for the purpose of scanning my old
> negatives and archiving them on CD's. Could anyone guide me on the
> following issues:
>
> 1-What resolution should I use for scanning?
The highest optical, in your case 2700 dpi. For archi
Quick questions before a response.
What dpi are you sending the image to the Photosmart printer in?
Does this problem have anything to do with the size you print to the
Photosmart printer (final print size)?
Are these photos/slides/negs, or are some scans from magazines or other
offset printe
Alan Tyson wrote:
> Khalid said:
>
>
>>> 2-What file Format should I use to save?
>>
> Arthur said:
>
>
>> TIFF or any other you think you will be able to read years
>
> from now,
>
>> which is lossless. That precludes JPEG
>
>
> Alan T says:
>
> Arthur,
>
> Khalid didn't give u
The first question is if these are true glass negatives (the emulsion is
directly placed on the glass plate) or if they are actually 4 x5"
negatives on a film base that have been sealed between on or two pieces
of glass usually with tape around the edges.
If they are negative film which has been
Erik Kaffehr wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is not really about sharpening in vuescan, but a reflection on
> sharpening in general.
>
> 1) Sharpening should be done before retouching the image, because sharpening
> causes many details to show up which have to be retouched.
>
> 2) Scanning itself i
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Just a couple of quick comments..
>
> 1. Cleaning neg's with water
> Bear in mind that if you use anything but 'unexposed' distilled water as
> a cleaning agent, you are in fact using carbonic acid..!
> I used to work in a oceanographic lab, and while checking the pH leve
I have taken my asbestos suit out, had it dry cleaned, and refitted:
Bob Shomler wrote:
>> Either Ed has stopped announcing new releases of Vuescan or not all
the mail
>> is getting through. Visited his site today and found that version
7.03 is
>> now available.
>>
>> Dale
There are several legal issues in terms of dating images for copyright.
On the one hand, you receive your copyright the moment you press the
shutter button, even prior to processing... which protects you from the
rolls being stolen in the mail to the processor, and the thief claiming
ownersh
Dave Nelson wrote:
> Actually, the copyright symbol is available in most fonts. In Photoshop,
> add test as you normally do, then when you need the © (copyright sysmbol,
> incase it didn't come through), Hold down the alt and type 0169 on the
> number pad, assuming your using Windows. MAC users
I am doing this in the public forum, because I want it witnessed.
I am formally requesting from the list owner, Tony Sleep, that "Dicky"
Richard Corbett be permanently removed from this list. I have never, in
the years I have been on this list made such a request, in spite of
considerably acrimo
Bill Ross wrote:
> By the way, my ss4k initialization sequence is broken - it
> was cycling interminably, so I tried a suggestion from Polaroid
> techs quoted on the ss4k list & pushed my slide holder through
> it a few times with the power off, and now rather than cycling,
> its initializatio
Cliff Ober wrote:
> Bob,
>
> Extremely well put, and 100% on the mark. Thanks for stating my feelings
> in such a succinct fashion.
>
> Cliff Ober
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Leonard
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001
HI Vicki,
There may be a number of advantages to waiting for Nikon's newer film
scanners, unless you must have one in the next several weeks.
The Ls-2000/30 models suffered from some stepper motor problems which
likely were designed out of the new scanners. Prices on quality CCD
chips have l
Tony Sleep wrote:
> Another very good reason for not using traditional Anglo Saxon terms of abuse
> is that I've now had a swathe of digests bounced back to me by nanny mailserver
> s/w
>
>
>> Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Precedence: bulk
>> X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> X-UIDL: _4
An article I read a few months back suggested that even when scanning to
web screen resolution (72 to 100 dpi or so), the results were
considerably better if the image was first scanned at higher resolution
(600-1200 dpi) and then downsampled to the lower 72-100 dpi for screen
display, using a
Dave King wrote:
> It depends on processor and chemistry QC & maintenence also, and this
> contributes to widely varying processing quality even though the exact
> same chemistry may be loaded initially. Also mini-labs may use 3rd
> party concoctions that aren't as good as Kodak or Fuji. If
As I understand it, GEM does not require specific hardware on the
scanner (like an infrared channel that ICE requires) to operate.
However, it is tweaked to the scanner's electronics. I also do not
believe it has to be in firmware. I'm fairly sure the GEM upgrade for
the Minolta Multi produc
701 - 800 of 1406 matches
Mail list logo
