still shoot
> uncompressed NEFs just in case. The D80, D70, D50 & D40 bodies only have
> compressed NEF.
>
> http://www.photography-forums.com/t80862-drawbacks-of-compressed-nef-in-d200
> .html
>
> Bob G
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
Dpreview.com's review indicates that it is a 12-bit raw format.
~Berry
On 7/13/07 11:27 PM, "David J. Littleboy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I was just playing with my new Nikon D200 and discovered
> something that surprised me. Unless there is some
One other detail I'd like to mention is that I really prefer the aspect
ratio of 4/3. A subjective matter, naturally. I think it is really silly,
this craze in movies and television for the very wide screen, which may suit
the sweeping landscape, but very often looks ridiculous and sacrifices the
o a friend of mine last year
> and he's enjoying it. They've just taken so long replacing it that
> there's really no choice in a high-end E model right now, though the
> leaked document about the E-1 replacement looks promising.
>
> -Rob
>
> On Jul 6, 2007, at 7:00 A
Just a detail, Rob, but the Oly E-1 has a weather-sealed magnesium body.
It's quite solid. I don't know if any of their other models have the
magnesium body, or if that feature is reserved for their pro line.
Berry
On 7/5/07 8:52 PM, "R.Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 5, 2007, a
erry
On 7/5/07 7:07 PM, "David J. Littleboy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Berry Ives" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 7/5/07 5:44 PM, "David J. Littleboy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The 4/3 sensor is 1/4 the area of the FF sen
On 7/5/07 5:44 PM, "David J. Littleboy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 4/3 sensor is 1/4 the area of the FF sensors, and not really a serious
> format. If one is concerned with image quality.
I think that for you to say this is equivalent, in the film world, of saying
that 35mm cameras are not
Laurie,
What does it mean that:
"The D200 and D2X produce a 35mm equivalent first generation capture"
The film sensor of the D200 is substantially smaller than a 35mm film image,
so I guess that is not what it means. So what is the basis for saying this?
This whole thing about judging photogra
Henk:
Excellent travel photos. Very nice compositions, and technically fine. I
really enjoyed perusing your work.
I also had been using a Contax Aria for over 7 years. One week ago, that
camera and my Zeiss lenses got burglarized from my home, so they are gone
now. I loved that camera; what a
here's no obvious calibration problem between it
> and the scanner). I've scanned with Nikon color management system on
> and off.
>
> Have you compared the neg scans you do with good quality prints of
> the negs you're scanning?
>
> Interested to hear any views. I&#
Hi,
I have been using the Nikon Coolscan V ED, but only for negatives. I have
no cyan or saturation problems, nor have I encountered any halo problems.
Is your experience with this scanner just with slides?
Berry
On 3/28/06 7:25 PM, "Maurice Rickard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was
I think Arthur and Austin are very much on target. Some specialty labs will
provide certain film services like scanning, etc.
Since when did artists ever have the market clout to dictate what would be
manufactured or supported by the manufacturers of mass market products?
Besides, most of them wi
I got an error of some kind when I first sent this, so am resending it.
~Berry
-- Forwarded Message
From: Berry Ives <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:33:05 -0700
To:
Conversation: [filmscanners] Re: Nikon Coolscan V ED
Subject: Re: [filmscanners] Re: Nikon Coolscan V ED
I didn't see my email posted on the list, so I am sending it again. Not
sure what went wrong.
-- Forwarded Message
From: Berry Ives <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:44:07 -0700
To:
Conversation: Nikon Coolscan V ED
Subject: Nikon Coolscan V ED
I hadn't used my
silver halide emulsions very well, so it does not work with
> B&W or Kodachromes which use silver halide emulsions.
>
>
> Original Message
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Berry Ives
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:25 PM
>
My only suggestion is that whatever you do, you should do it with Digital
ICE enabled. You will want to use the scans as is and not screw around
trying to remove dust from the images (other than a couple blasts from your
Dust Off before you scan).
Berry
On 7/19/05 6:06 AM, "Simon Pearson" <[EMA
Since I have the Coolscan V ED, all this makes me glad I'm not shooting
slides. I assume my scanner would have the same issue as the CS 5000.
Someday I'll probably get some of my old slides out and scan them, though.
And now I know that if I discover one that has edge softness I can't stand,
to re
Yuk! Carbon tet! We used to kill insects with it for general science class
in the early 60's. Very deadly stuff. But I'm still here
On 5/19/05 3:40 AM, "Tony Sleep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arthur Entlich wrote:
>
>> OK, how about this... maybe the PEC is responsible ;-)
>
> I've nev
My brother has the old XA, for many years now, and the Canon 350D, at about
30 oz with lens, must be about 4x the mass, and it isn't going to fit in
anybody's shirt pocket.
Berry
On 4/25/05 7:34 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> David J. Littleboy wrote
>
>> The small-
I work mostly in color, but I am interested to know where I might find a
comparison of Epson 2200 B&W with Quadtone B&W. I read a review once that
thought very highly of the 2200 B&W. Does anyone think it would be
worthwhile to set up my old 1160 with Quadtone, rather than simply use the
2200? L
es active-X, so I need IE for that too.
>
>
> Berry Ives wrote:
>
>> Okay, off topic, but it is my filmscanner mail that is disappearing.
>>
>> I just read today's new filmscanner email, then checked my "deleted items"
>> folder. None of the previo
Okay, off topic, but it is my filmscanner mail that is disappearing.
I just read today's new filmscanner email, then checked my "deleted items"
folder. None of the previously missing emails were there, and I think I had
checked that before anyway. But then I went back to my in box, and the
films
use? (I think I want to
> stay away from it ;-))
>
> If I lost my last 3 months of email archives, I'd be.... very annoyed!
>
> Art
>
> Berry Ives wrote:
>
>> When I checked my in box this morning, all of my filmscanner mail for the
>> last 3 months was gone.
When I checked my in box this morning, all of my filmscanner mail for the
last 3 months was gone. Perhaps I did something...maybe just losing it, my
mind, that is. Anyway, just in case someone expected a response from me to
something I haven't seen...
---
happen,
even though there is now the digital Leicastyled rangefinder made by Epson.
Thanks for the correction.
Berry
On 4/19/05 9:27 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zeiss own the Contax name not Kyocera, so they wont be the ones selling it.
>
> On 4/
This is off topic, but I expect there are some other Contax folks out there.
I was disappointed to hear that Kyocera is quitting the camera business,
including Contax. I read some rumors that Sony might be interested. But I
like the Kyocera/Yashica/Contax/Zeiss association, with their quality
pro
han 3:2.
Berry
On 3/26/05 11:51 AM, "Brad Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25/3/05 17:33, "Berry Ives" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Still waiting for the right DSLR
Austin, with respect to your last sentence, isn't the point really that the
contrast range of negative film is greater than slide film? What I mean is
that you can lose either the shadows or the highlights, but slide film
requires more precise exposures and is more limited in the range that it can
been many months since I've been able to do any scanning, so I
> don't remember exactly how to set things up, but I thought I'd at
> least assure you that it can be done.
>
> --Bill
>
>
> At 7:00 PM -0700 12/9/04, Berry Ives wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>>
Hi folks,
My problem persists. I am wondering if others who use Nikon scanners on Mac
(assuming there are some) are using Colorsync.
If so, what settings are you using in Nikon Scan etc for color management?
Thanks,
Berry
--
on 11/18/04 9:41 PM, Dieter Henkel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Friday, November 19, 2004, 3:43:29 AM, Mike K. wrote:
>
>> Dieter Henkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>
>>> The main downside is the extremly slow speed if ICE is turned on. You
>>> can't turn off the grain dissolver which might add t
on 11/19/04 4:03 PM, Al Bond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When my wife went on a trip to Spain, a problem with her camera meant that
> most of her slides were 1-2 stops overexposed. I have been trying to scan in
> and recover some of the shots but with limited success.
>
> Although the s
on 11/10/04 1:32 AM, Arthur Entlich at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Although I'm not a big fan of some versions of dICE (due to the fact
> that it can tend to soften the whole image due to residual silver
> removal (which it infers is dust or dirt)), or if the IR is not exactly
> tuned to the dye sp
on 11/9/04 2:46 AM, Chris Aitken at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Further to my previous messages I have obtained a Scan Dual I on trial. I
> have tried it with the Vuescan trial version (and also the Minolta drivers -
> so this must be a later model that works on XP).
>
> Although my neg
on 11/2/04 4:40 AM, Al Bond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Berry Ives wrote:
>
>> It seems like I have
>> heard of grain aliasing issues, or somesuch. I am printing at 1440
>> dpi on watercolor paper with an Epson 2200.
>
> A couple of points. Firstly, the El
By Elite, I was referring to the Elite 5400. ~Berry
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or bod
I am getting PS-CS to replace PS 5 LE and Elements.
To support PS-CS, I am moving from Mac OS 9.1 to OS 10.3. I have also
decided to replace my Mac G4 with a G5.
I have been using a Minolta Scan Dual II, which does not support OS 10, so I
am considering the Scan Dual IV.
The SD-IV has sufficien
I notice on the Minolta compatibility chart, the following footnotes
regarding use of the Scan Dual IV with Mac OS-X:
*3:You must be logged on as an administrator to complete the driver
installation.
*4:The Mac OS X plug-in cannot be used with applications that are not OS X
native.
Since it is st
it is now distributed by Konica-Minolta after Minolta required a
> bail out financially. This is probably a good thing. With the current
> price of a bit over $250 US, it is probably the best film scanner value
> once again, and it is considerably improved from the version 2.
>
&
Okay, does anyone have experience on both the Minolta SD2 and SD4?
If so, please share that with me. I've read the specs already.
Thanks,
Berry
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe
on 7/14/04 8:48 PM, Norm Carver at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am in the midst of doing a basic comparison between my Hasselblad and the
> new Kodak SLR Pro (14mb, full frame). I don't need a super accurate test,
> just reasonably fair. My work is half color, half b&w with the end product
> in bo
files done can be an expensive
> proposition.
>
> Bernie
>
> Berry Ives wrote:
>
>> Here is Epson's response:
>>
>>
>>> Photoshop Elements has a certail level of color control built in to the
>>> application but i not advanced enough to handle the full
Here is Epson's response:
>
> Photoshop Elements has a certail level of color control built in to the
> application but i not advanced enough to handle the full capabiities of ICC
> profiles. Photoshop Elements 2 has slightly more support, but the full
> range of features and ways to apply the pro
Since
>>> things worked before you installed the profiles, you may wish to go
>>> back to square one and see if that makes a difference.
>>>
>>> Bernie
>>>
>>>
>>> Berry Ives wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
Hello, if there's anybody out there.
I have a problem using PS Elements 1.0. I know there is a list for PS, but
maybe one of you folks can make this easy.
I have a scanned image that is 17.6 MB. I am trying to print it on an Epson
2200, 13x19 @1440dpi. I am getting an error after the printer d
to my 6x6's and 645's though -- both for darkroom and
> scanning on the Epson 2450 (which I'll be upgrading soon). My trusty
> Polaroid 4000 takes care of the 35mm stuff.
>
> Bernie
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[E
on 6/2/04 6:39 PM, David Lewiston at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm getting ready for another field trip. In the past, I have always used
> K25 for subjects with fine detail. Imacon scans have yielded 20x prints
> effortlessly.
>
> K25 is no longer manufactured in the U.S. Is it still available in
on 6/2/04 6:39 PM, David Lewiston at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm getting ready for another field trip. In the past, I have always used
> K25 for subjects with fine detail. Imacon scans have yielded 20x prints
> effortlessly.
>
> K25 is no longer manufactured in the U.S. Is it still available in
on 3/23/04 2:07 PM, Ed Lusby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I believe the Epsons are all 8.5x11. I just bought a 3170 and love it. The
> included profiles seem very good, better than I could generate with Monaco
> EZ Color. If you don't have too much large scanning to do, perhaps you
> could stitc
I just wanted to say that I scanned a 4x5 color neg (Agfa) with my new 2450
flatbed, using the film scanning method in manual mode, making a ~100MB file
(48-bit depth). Brought it into PS Elements, which reduced it to 24-bit,
cropped it, and sent it to my new 2200 printer. No adjustments in PS.
Okay, this is a bit OT, but I went to Adobe website and cannot find the
info. Does anyone know if I can upgrade Elements 1 to Elements 2?
Elements 1 was packaged with my new (refurb) Epson 2450. I guess I'm going
to have Elements available as well as PS5LE, and see what works best for me.
Berry
on 11/14/03 6:18 AM, Arthur Entlich at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That's interesting. The Minolta Dual Dimage II also suffered from the
> same problem. I went through several before getting one with minimal
> defects. My scanner was apparently made by Avision for Minolta, I don't
> know who is
on 11/12/03 9:51 PM, Ellis Vener at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 11:05 PM, KARL SCHULMEISTERS wrote:
>
>> The nice thing about Elements, is that it allows you to upgrade to
>> full PS
>> for a discount.
>
>
> Having worked with Photoshop Cs for about a week I
I gathered from past posts that PS Elements does not support processing in
16 bit mode. Also, I gathered that it does not have curves.
Question: Do these limiitations still apply to PS Elements 2.0?
I don't need a discussion on 16 vs 8 bit etc, just a yes or no to both
questions. The PS web si
on 11/6/03 7:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just a quick thanks to everyone who responded about the new Pentax camera.
> It's probably unlikely I'll be able to afford one soon - much as I would
> love to avoid the issues with scanning on the LS30. :) The reason I'm
> unlik
on 11/2/03 2:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Berry,
>
> The 2200 is the first decent color printer I have owned and used for "fine"
> prints. Previously, I scanned my transparencies, put them on a CD and had
> them printed by an service bureau on the Pictrograph 3000 or 4000
on 10/24/03 2:26 AM, Paul D. DeRocco at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> I was on the Epson list for a long time and this is the first time I've
>> heard someone make this statement about the internal behaviour of
>> the Epson
>> driver. Can I ask where this knowledge com
on 10/24/03 7:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ditto. I printed two sharp 8X10 images of a scanned flower image, one with
> no discernible parallel vertical lines. I printed one at 300 and one at 360
> dpi on an Epson 2200. They were indistinguishable with a loupe.
>
> I woul
on 10/29/03 7:56 PM, Berry Ives at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Okay, I'm about to but the Epson 2200. Also thinking about the Minolta
> 5400, which comes with Elements. I am still using the PS 5.0 LE that came
> with previous hardware. I remember hearing that Elements will onl
Okay, I'm about to but the Epson 2200. Also thinking about the Minolta
5400, which comes with Elements. I am still using the PS 5.0 LE that came
with previous hardware. I remember hearing that Elements will only open
8-bit files, and not 16-bit files.
1. I usually convert the Scan Dual II imag
Here's an idea. I think all of us could agree to one thing, and that is:
what finally matters is how good the print looks. (Okay, some folks only
care about web published images, so you guys can get lost--no offense.)
There needs to be an art show where what we are judging is the actual
prints.
on 10/21/03 2:04 AM, Eugene A La Lancette PhD MD at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> 240 dpi is all that is needed.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 9:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subje
on 10/15/03 1:05 PM, Austin Smith at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's true that high quality silver-based B&W film, when properly exposed and
> developed, has a higher dynamic range than chromogenic B&W. It's also true
> that it is not a classic "wet darkroom" film, since it's normally developed
>
on 10/13/03 7:57 AM, KARL SCHULMEISTERS at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Besides the sharpness of B&W film that others have commented on, B&W film
> has much greater dynamic range than color film (some film approaches 12
> stops), an you can control contrast in 'difficult' situations via Zone
> Sys
s
>
> Malcolm
>
> Tel: +44-(0)1473-626599
> Mob: +44-(0)7906-056498
> Web: http://www.analogue-precision.com
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Berry Ives" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2
>>
> I've had very poor results scanning TMax 400 and Ilford Delta 400 with
> my SS4000. Terrible grain so NeatImage was a must.
>
I've had good results scanning T400 CN with a Minolta Scan Dual II. I'll
send a jpeg to anyone who wants to see it.
Berry
--
on 9/12/03 5:00 PM, Paul D. DeRocco at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Arthur Entlich
>>
>> I just took a look at the image you directed me to. But I didn't stop
>> there, because without a comparison it doesn't mean a lot. Is the
>> defect due to the jpegging, is
on 9/11/03 4:59 PM, David J. Littleboy at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> "Nagaraj, Ramesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asks:
> Take a picture using 6MP DSLR at full resolution. Also scan a slide
> using 4000dpi scanner. Open both image files in Adobe and observe at 100%.
>
> Image from DSLR loo
on 9/6/02 5:02 PM, Bernie Kubiak at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On September 4th I got an email from B&H saying they had the 2200 in
> stock. I ordered one that morning and they confirmed shipping my order
> that night. On the 5th the website indicated the unit was out of stock.
> FedEx says its
on 4/17/02 4:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 08:58:20 -0400 Austin Franklin
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> I don't believe those are one in the same... Yes, the dye densities are
>> higher with slides, but the noise is also higher in a slide (less
>
on 4/17/02 2:37 PM, Anthony Atkielski at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For an example of a recent scan, see
>
> http://www.atkielski.com/Wallpapers/images/EiffelInvalidesPaper1600x1200.jpg
>
> This is a scan of a Velvia 6x6 transparency, ICE set to normal, no GEM or
> ROC, no other adjustments, and t
on 3/2/02 4:52 AM, Arthur Entlich at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I suggest you might wish to read the archives on this and the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
>
> The streaking problems are an unfortunate quality control defect that
> has appeared in numerous of these scanners, both the Elite II line an
on 2/7/02 10:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> But is there a way to make PS-LE open a jpeg file in Adobe RGB space?
>
> Not sure.
> Does it have under color options, "convert to default space" or "ask"?
> Or does it have under Mode, the "assign/convert" options after openin
on 2/5/02 9:14 PM, Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To be a bit more specific, you can scan at 16-bit depth and Elements will open
> the image but will convert it automatically to 8-bit depth.
>
> Maris
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Ber
on 12/1/01 9:37 AM, Austin Franklin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It sounds to me like either the rubber wiper and/or the sealing cap is/are
> not working. When the heads are not in use, they move all the way to the
> right and are sealed off with the double foam pad that soaks up the ink
> duri
Thanks to the several people who sent tips on cleaning the clogged nozzle of
my 1160 which is using Generations Micro-Bright pigment inks. I had a
single nozzle continuing to fail the nozzle check after many standard Epson
(menu driven) cleanings.
What worked for me (finally!) was to repeat abou
I am considering getting some calibration software, namely ColorVision's
moniter spyder with PhotoCal ($199) and their Profiler RGB, both of which
seem to be very popular. The latter requires one to have a flatbed scanner,
so I am wondering what flatbed would be decent for this purpose. I really
on 4/23/01 2:51 PM, Vladislav Jurco at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> I'm about to make the same switch. Can you explain in more
>> detail, or show (via
>> a small jpeg) what the striping looks like? In which
>> direction relative to the
>> scanning process are the stripes?
>>
>> Art
>
>
on 4/19/01 10:48 AM, Ramesh Kumar_C at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Art
> When "holder error" came for the FIRST TIME, I rebooted PC and I did
> NOT get the
> "holder error" so continued scanning; but the resulting scans were Megenta,
> Green ..
>
> Then I reinstalled the software and everythi
Here is a follow-up on Minolta's warranty service quality: it sucks.
My scanner developed a problem after 20 or 30 scans, when it began leaving a
cyan toned line across the long dimension of the image. It appeared that
the CCD had a few pixels fail or maybe some crud on them. A couple people
o
on 4/18/01 10:23 AM, Ramesh Kumar_C at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I have written a mail to Minolta.
> Minolta is so bad, none of the document that came with scanner have
> telephone number of customer support.
Their customer support number is 201-825-4000 ext 5721
-Berry
on 4/17/01 4:00 PM, Laurie Solomon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok. Although they are a pain to try and contact, I would call Minolta about
> your problem. I would also recheck your SCSI card's seating in the slot as
> well as your termination settings and SCSI ID setting.
>
> -Original M
on 3/24/01 5:24 PM, Berry Ives at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Guess this is a question for Minolta...
>
> My scanner just started making a thin band across the long dimension of the
> image, viewable on the monitor and comes out on the print as well. The band
> has a cyan cast,
on 4/5/01 6:46 AM, Martin Wiseman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After much research I have decided that a Minolta Scan Elite will probably
> suit my needs, however I want to do a couple of test scans before I part
> with that much cash.
>
> I was all set to go to Jessops (who had it lis
I'm not sure whether you already it this way, but here is what works on my
G4.
I have it plugged into one of my keyboard's USB sockets, with the mouse
plugged into the other one. I never disconnect it.
I wake up the G4, then turn on the Scan Dual, which must have the door
completely closed at t
on 3/30/01 11:20 AM, Jon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here is a link to Epson's recommendation
>
> http://support.epson.com/webadvice/wa0216.html
>
> I don't know why they made it so hard to find.
>
> Jon
>
>> It would be nice if we could get definitive responses from the
>> manufacturers
>>
on 3/29/01 7:58 AM, Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The general consensus is printing in the range of 240-360dpi, and it will
> depend on the paper - for a good explanation of why see
> http://www.scantips.com/
>
> The best thing to do is to experiment on *your* printer and fi
Guess this is a question for Minolta...
My scanner just started making a thin band across the long dimension of the
image, viewable on the monitor and comes out on the print as well. The band
has a cyan cast, and it is about 1/32" wide (1 mm) on a full format
7x10.5"(18x26cm) print. I appears c
on 3/14/01 4:00 PM, Tony Sleep at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 09:08:20 +0100 Henk de Jong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>>> I'm sure we're all using at least 1280X1024...
>>
>> No, don't be too shure about that: I am working at 1024x768 on a 17" monitor
>> ;-)
>
> Huh. I'm cu
on 3/19/01 1:52 PM, Larry Berman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Lynn,
>
> You can tell which are digital by the alt tags. The DSC numbers are the
> names of the digital files from the D1. I purposely left it out of the
> article. Glad you liked it.
>
> Larry
>
>
>> Very nice article, Larry;
> Larry Berman wrote:
>
>> I forgot to include the link.
>>
>> Sorry...
>>
>> Jay Maisel sent me a dozen images plus a portrait for use in promoting the
>> interview on my web site. The interview is now scheduled as a cover story
>> in Shutterbug Magazine. The text of the interview hasn't c
on 3/10/01 2:08 AM, Arthur Entlich at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Now for something completely different:
>> what is the difference between the Scan Dual II and Scan Dual II White? Both
>> come up after a search of cdnet and znet, with the White version being
Does installing Vuescan have any effect on my Mac/NEC/Scan Dual II/PS-LE
system when I am not using Vuescan, but using the Scan Dual II software?
One thing that puzzled me, not necessarily related to the above question--I
wouldn't know--is that when I installed Vuescan it asked me to select 1.8 o
on 3/8/01 8:17 PM, Frank Paris at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Elmar Pinkhardt
>> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 6:26 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: AW: filmscanners: Puzzled about display reso
This is embarrassing, but:
How do you make a 13 x 19" print using Photoshop LE? I find the PS software
to be rediculously confusing. I want to make the highest resolution print
at the largest size I can using 13 x 19" paper with an 1160. So far, the
largest print I can do is 8.75" x 13" on the
Title: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
on 3/5/01 3:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm thinking about some improvements to the VueScan
> user interface, and I'd like to solicit feedback and suggestions.
>
> Regards,
> Ed Hamrick
>
I just started
on 3/2/01 4:11 PM, Arthur Entlich at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Experience with hardware is, of course, a great help in providing sage
> advice. My only caveat is that the high tech industry gets traded more
> often than chips in a poker game, and information a few years old can be
> based upon
on 3/1/01 6:14 PM, Hersch Nitikman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Also, I can vouch for the short life of an NEC. I had a 2-year-old 17"
> multiscan suddenly, irrevocably, go black on me a few months ago. Repair
> would have cost more than a replacement.
> Hersch
>
Anecdotal information is someti
on 1/30/01 2:00 AM, Sumtingwong at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Some great shots!
>
> Spencer Stone
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cooke, Julie
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 7:54 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: film
on 2/26/01 9:47 PM, Doug Herr at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> At 06:17 PM 26/02/01 -0800, you wrote:
I did do the individual RGB adjustments to the best of my
abilities. It was fun seeing what could be done, but my result was still
imperfect. Does the
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
