with anticipation !
Many thanks, David
--
You can view David's on-line folio at http://www.davidtownend.com/
and also the results of a recent job at http://www.globalrisks.royalsun.com
T - 00 44 (0)20 8374 6289
M - 00 44 (0)7770 622144
. Fortunately, taking a focus reading with
VueScan is quite quick.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe
in areas of high detail and contrast. Since raw scan data
doesn't have such areas, JPEG works well.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe
Photoshop as a graphics
design/layout package, but as the first step in one's scanning workflow, it
seems to be quite the right thing.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail
yet.
FWIW
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
was expecting it to take an
age...)
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate
print they show is lovely), but
that the Canon is going to be for the rest of us. I'm just getting back into
film photography after a long hiatus, and figured either the 950C or the 900
would be enough for my needs for at least a year or so...
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
that saves money:
you can't waste a lot of paper at half an hour a shot). And I'd love to be
persuaded that the Minolta's the right way to go.)
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe
Have a look at the Minolta Scan Multi Pro
rm
For slides, fine. For negs, I would say a big thumbs down. I do have
extensive real-world experience in that realm. I've already learned the
hard lessons the expensive way.
Joyfully, -david soderman
and purchased the 8000, I don't have A3 quality images yet.)
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe
for 16x20, and I've learned the hard way that some are problematic
for full-bleed A4. Sigh.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe
more dust debris under the glass. One fellow even had the
salesman opening up one box after the next...in an attempt to locate *any*
particular Epson 2450 unit that didn't have the dust/debris under the glass!
Happy scanning.
Joyfully, -david soderman
adapter is somewhat frustrating re: dust. I've found it
necessary to frequently disassemble/clean it.
Otherwise, vertical tram lines will begin to randomly appear. The unit
does not have ICE, so some dust spotting is inevitable.
All in all, I'm quite happy with the unit.
Joyfully, -david soderman
negs. That's why we use fill flash!
David Hoffman
--
__
David Hoffman Photo Library
http://www.hoffmanphotos.com
phone +44 (0)20 8981 5041 fax +44 (0)20 8980 2041
the peripheral
into the card? Or is there more to it than that?
It's that easy in Win 2000, so it should be the same story in XP. (Should,
of course, is a very dangerous word...)
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
minutes for no-margin prints. From reading the fine print, this seems to be
what it takes. Sigh. Oh well, it'll keep my printing costs downg.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe
I have worked as a freelance photographer for many years and am now looking
to replace my b/w darkroom with a film scanner.
I shoot medium format (t-max 100) film and the end use is for high qualiy
glossy magazines and corporate publications, usually A4, very occasionally
A3. The scanner would
it to on the scan when it's done.
David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
Test - please ignore
_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with
change to the
blue channel. Moving from consumer digital to scanned film, I've been quite
surprised at the radical color adjustments that are required. I suppose
that's unavoidable?
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
I've experienced this too, scanning Scala on a Minolta
Scan Multi Pro. There is definately shadow detail
present which does not show with a loupe on a light
table or when projected. Weird, but who's complaining?
--- Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave writes:
Somebody pinch me, I
As I understand it neg film has lower density so that
it can be printed with short exposure times.
Neg film should actually be much more prone to
posterisation/areas of uniform tone when scanned -
especially if you try to capture the full dynamic range.
be wrong.) Perhaps David S. would correct me if I'm off the wall here.
As Art said, the Minolta is scanning at 4800ppi so it may be worth
doing the comparison at 4000dpi for both scanners.
My understanding is that the Minolta is a 3200 dpi scanner for 6x6 film. Of
course, one might be able to use
Simon Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have definitely found that my negs scanned with much less noise/grain
using Vuescan rather than the Minolta software, and that multisampling
helped greatly.
How well did you fin IR cleaning in Vuescan to work with the Minolta? (I
found David S's ICE
David Ramey Photography
PO Box 944
Kasilof, AK 99610-0944
USA
phone: (907) 252-1910
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tom
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] FS4000 - new
a Nikon 8000ED for a Minolta Scan Multi Pro?
-david soderman-
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message
Mix wrote:
LS-8000
6x6 unmounted, 1x sampling, 8-bit, 4000 dpi is taking about 20 minutes.
Does this match others?
Thanks,
Mix
On a G4 400mhz w/1.5 gigs of RAM the above took 2 minutes without ICE...10
minutes with.
Joyfully, -david soderman
' earlier comments regarding this earlier this month.
Thanks
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 5:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[filmscanners] Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000
Hi folks,
After
work. My thought is you could dot the raw scans in Insight then bring them
into Photoshop or Photoshop/HDR.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[filmscanners] Re: Using
as a
presentation slide recorder.
David
Arthur Entlich wrote:
I haven't been following this thread, but has your friend considered
zipping or otherwise compressing the files with another computer and
then uploading them somewhere on the net and then downloading them to
his new computer
to return it for a full refund.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[filmscanners] Re: SCSI to Firewire SS4000
I use an Orange Micro adapter with no trouble. What
Has anyone heard anything on the status of Xpan holder and firmware that was
supposed to be out anytime around now for the Polaroid SS4000? Who would I
contact to find out more about this? Many thanks.
David T
Dan,
As you know Silverfast is a Photoshop plugin. You might be amused to know
that some folks have trashed Insight because it is not.
A suggestion, could you do raw scans in Insight and edit them in HDR. I
haven't tried it myself. Just a thought.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Dave,
The lamp off feature only works on the 4000Plus.
David
-Original Message-
From: Dave Kent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[filmscanners] Problems installing SS4000 in WinXP with
PolaColor Insight 5.5.1
The latest upgrade is for all SS4000, SS4000Plus, SS120 and SS45Ultra
scanners.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[filmscanners] Re: Polaroid PolaColor Insight
software
is very good, on the same level as Silverfast but some find the film carrier
a pain for 35mm. Personally I feel pretty good to be in the same ballpark as
the Precision at 2 or 3 times the price.
David
-Original Message-
From: geoff murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday
I have been scanning Xpan transparencies using the
multi-format holder and Minolta software - results are
excellent, although strangely there might possibly be
a slight magenta cast which isn't present when
scanning 35mm slides.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks
Denis,
Does VueScan with
Funny you should mention Smart Friendly. They are out of business, seems
their CEO ran off with millions.
David
-Original Message-
From: Austin Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 10:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[filmscanners] RE
The Minolta Scan Multi Pro suffers none of these
problems except possibly some clipping with negatives,
comes with glass holders, dICE, etc and is cheaper
than Nikon or Polaroid scanners.
--- Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From reports I have received, the problem with the
banding is a
The Mystery is solved!
Of course, the other mystery is why anyone would do such a thing! ;-)
Art
Perhaps he prefers to live in a country where *English* is spoken...
David L
Unsubscribe by mail
. That was not
always the case.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 4:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[filmscanners] Re: New Adaptec ASPI version 4.70 released -
Not for W95
Do you know of any advantages
. And is their new stuff
happening to help with better registration of the images?
Calibrate
Save Raw File
Refresh
Save
While some of these seem obvious, an explanation on their exact way of
functioning would help me to master the software and the art of scanning.
Many thanks in advance!
David T
400
and 450.
I think this is going to happen but not 100% sure. If anyone is interested
contact me off list and I will forward to the dealer.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 6:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Some of you have suggested sources of third party ink for printers. I cannot
find those messages. Please email me off list with vendors you have had good
luck with.
Thanks
David
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL
Bob,
Version 5.0.x is posted on www.polaroidwork.com in the support section.
There is a newer Beta version 5.5 on my FTP site.
ftp.polaroid.com/pub/imaging/input
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:19 PM
. It is $40
David
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
Yes... Definitely learn how to use your scanner, scanning software, and
color management properly, and you will be happier with your scans.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Enoch's Vision,
Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Kent
I concur... Definitely
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[filmscanners] Re: The last of the Sprintscan 4000
Original Message -
From: Hemingway, David J [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The last 100 Sprintscan 4000's are being shipped, 50 this week and 50 next
Dan
I expect to receive several hundred the first week in Feb. I will advise
when I know they are in house. Just like those rebate's, they will arrive!!!
David
-Original Message-
From: Dan Honemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL
years. I have just finished scanning 3,000 35mm slides and archiving
these to CD's. Your film scanner has worked beautifully and without error
this past 6 weeks. These slides included many very dense and difficult
Kodachromes of the 70's and 80's.
Regards
David
.
www.pcsforeveryone.com
David
-Original Message-
From: Jim Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 12:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[filmscanners] Re: Building PC system for image editing
- Original Message -
From: Alex Zabrovsky [EMAIL
Polaroid has on order since December 500 SS4000 slide holders. I am trying
to get the status of this order and will advise.
David
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners
. Www.adobe.com just took me straight to their website.
Joyfully, -david soderman-
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate
:[filmscanners] Re: OT: Film Recorders
David
Since you asked I have now gone to XP and can't get my 8K printer to work
with it. Raster
plus 2.0.6b. Is there a patch?
Can't find one.
I now have it connected to my old P350 PC under ME but want to have it
running on my current
PC with XP.
Thanks
Rob
Production of the SS4000 has ceased and is being replaced by the SS4000 Plus
which is currently in production. Whatever is in dealer inventory is all
that is remaining.
BH and Ecost got the last slug a week or so ago.
David
-Original Message-
From: Thomas B. Maugham [mailto:[EMAIL
From what I was told a couple of years ago that is precisely the reason. I
had several friends who worked at a profitable but not profitable enough
division of Agfa that was closed/sold.
David
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Entlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January
IME the Adaptec cards are the best but I have used a couple of cheapo's with
no problem. A month or so ago there were some new cheapo's on ebay for well
less than $50
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 5:55 AM
I too am used to older Nikon scanners and combining
multiple scans at different exposures. I have been
using the Minolta for about a month, and have not as
yet found an image which is beyond the usable dynamic
range of the scanner in a single scan. My images are
mostly Velvia, Astia and Pan-F so
Plus = Firewire USB No SSCSI; 14 bits
All in all at the current price of $500 - $550 after rebate the SS4000 is a
bargain!
David
-Original Message-
From: Thomas B. Maugham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Larry,
Polaroid does officially support ANY USB/SCSI or Firewire/SCSI adapters.
That being said the only ones that success has been reported with are
Adaptec and OrangeMicro. Adaptec seems to have the most success. MicroTech
particularly have failed.
David
-Original Message-
From
Stan,
I think it was not implemented in the firmware. In my view it is not a big
deal as I have never known a lamp to fail. I will try to chase down some
more details.
David
-Original Message-
From: S Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 3:49 PM
Thomas B. Maugham [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Sun, 23 Dec 2001 11:29:43
-0500
Can anyone point me to a discussion list for the Polaroid 4000 film scanner?
You are here!
What was the question!!
--
David Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED
about Silverfast, it's too hard to
learn properly, stick with Polaroid Insight or (better still) Vuescan.
Basically - it works!
--
David Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe by mail
They are rated as life of hardware They are much different than the normal
fluorescents on the old SS35+
David
-Original Message-
From: S Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 3:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[filmscanners] RE: SS4000
I'm still waiting.
Sent in the paperwork in the first week of Sept.
Salutations, David Lewiston
- Original Message -
From: Andy Darlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:19 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: SS4000 Rebate UPC
Hello
business.
I would be happy to have some sample images done for you. If you are
interested contact me by email and we can discuss.
David
Subject: OT: Film Recorders
Hi All
I've been lurking for a while, but not had anything to contribute,
although I have a few questions to ask, so will be putting
issuing the
rebate.
David
-Original Message-
From: JackG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 9:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: SS4000 Rebate UPC
Nope, sent mine in about the same time.
John in OKC
recommend the Adaptec SlimSCSI
--
David Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe' in the title or
body
The only focus problems I has with the LS-20 were
depth of field related on curved film. I found the
best solution to focussing was to set an autofocus
point about half way between the centre of the frame
and one of the corners.
--- Andy Darlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My friend has a Nikon
Ron,
We have done some testing and know the
Microtech does NOT work reliability. The most compatible is the Adaptec but for
the PC I STRONGLY recommend you purchase a inexpensive SCSI card such as the
Adaptec 2906.
David
-Original
Message-
From: Ron Erter
[mailto:[EMAIL
with colour negative film, although
you might have to fiddle a little with curves. Vuescan
is supossed to do a good job, too.
Regards
David Harris
--- Tomasz Zakrzewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I havent't put my hands on any filmscanner yet, I
haven't seen any in action
neither.
That's why I
has experiened exactly
the same problem.
Regards
David
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated
12/17/2001 8:10:10 AM EST,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I, and others, have found that in practical terms
Vuescan does not work with the MSMP and firewire
under
W2k. But apparently
and white points?
--
David Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for how the image appearance is going to change when it goes into
Photoshop.
What I see in the VueScan window is what I get in Photoshop - am I doing
something right!
--
David Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
of www.macosrumors.com !
--
David Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
into Photoshop! How
are your ColorSync settings? I too am using Adobe RBB (1998), when I've
finnished fiddling in Vuescan the final preview looks the same as the
file when opened in PS.
Isn't that the way it's meant to work, Ed?
--
David Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
!! :)
David
-Original Message-
From: Hersch Nitikman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: filmscanners: VueScan Histogram
Poor Ed. He can't win. Anything he does, no matter how many wanted it, some
others
A-TTL flash measurements are linked to the active AF sensor
for given exposure, so can handle well off-center subjects (of course if
focused properly). Is that correct ?
Sometimes, depending on the camera.
FEL works best for off centre (EOS 3, IV)
--
David Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ed
I copied the file to c:\winnt\inf, but still no dice.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may be called c:\winnt\inf or c:\win2k\inf -
whatever
your windows directory is called.
I use Windows 2000, and it's called c:\winnt\inf on
my
system. The name of the directory can be specified
My experience with the vast majority slides is if you want to get the
maximum shadow detail and sharpness you can clean and scan the slide faster
with a scanner using a diffuse light source than with a scanner that needs
multi-scanning to get maximum shadow detail and IR dust detection.
David
Bernie,
The proof of
purchase is a secondary label above the serial sticker that has a bar code
starting with the number sequence 0 74100 This is the UPC code for the product.
Any inexpensive
SCSI card will do just find. I would expect it would cost no mare $40 - $60.
David
For any Sprintscan 4000 purchased after 9/01/2001 the upgrade for Silverfast
AI is $10 US. For Sprintscan 120 and Sprintscan Ultra the upgrade is free.
The upgrade price for Silverfast HDR is $45 US
David
-Original Message-
From: Skip Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
You got a deal!!!
-Original Message-
From: JackG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: filmscanners: Polaroid Insight vs. Silverfast AI vs.
Vuescan
Hi David,
Maybe I got lucky, I purchased the SS 4000
of my findings here.
Joyfully, -david soderman-
*except* for the sinister gaussian blur!
Finally, I just gave up and re-installed Photoshop ('twas version 6 for me).
I realize that this is not a blazing new revelation...but probably a good
practical suggestion as a starting point for your troubleshooting.
Joyfully, -david soderman-
I have had discussions with the FLARR' people. Lets just say they have a
very unique business model!
David
-Original Message-
From: SKID Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 1:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: filmscanners: Howtek
that being said the 4000+ will support multiscanning and it has been
implemented in the 4000+ version of Silverfast. It was done to satisfy the
check box buyers.
In my personal view any scanner requiring multiscanning to get acceptable
results is poorly designed.
David
-Original Message-
From
I would think Silverfast probably does already for the Nikon scanners but
have no first hand experience. When I scan with my Nikon's I use Nikonscan.
David
-Original Message-
From: Al Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 5:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
, -david soderman-
P.S.--- I bought my 400mhz G4 just before the end of 2000. At the beginning
of 2001, Apple came out with the 800+ mhz machines. I wasn't even looking
at hi-rez MF film scanners back then. (That's the way the mop flops!)
Yes, the old Raytheon plant on RT 20. I hear we may be vacating it, rumor.
They have been moving a lot of the film manufacturing to Scotland and
Holland so there is a bunch of space in the Polaroid complex on RT 128 so it
may be back to Waltham.
David
-Original Message-
From: Wilson
Newton free glass as one of the two
pieces. Why only one is Newton free I frankly don't know but I am told that
is all that is necessary.
David
Newton rings are an interference cancellation from light trying to
get through two transparent but reflective surfaces that are less
than a wavelength apart
I would guess about $250, the tooling costs and limited volume to spread
those costs are why it will be a little pricey. That AN glass is not cheap
either!!
David
-Original Message-
From: Op's [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 5:30 AM
To: [EMAIL
Hemingway, David J [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Thu, 29 Nov
2001 12:52:57 -0500
I would imagine one could develop a test that showed the differences but I
am not sure you would see that much difference on a practical basis.
This is between the 4000 and the 4000 + ? Would a reasonable person see
Pat,
Early next year we will be coming out with 6 x 17 panoramic support for the
SS120. I would think this would due the trick. There will be a glass holder
released to handle the 9 x 17 as well as any other odd formats.
Regards
David
-Original Message-
From: Pat Perez [mailto:[EMAIL
place!!
Regards
David
-Original Message-
From: Lloyd O'Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 6:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: filmscanners: Polaroid SS4000 / 4000+ / 120 ???
I can give you my opinion on part of this comparison. I have
The petition has been received and is being acted on!
David
-Original Message-
From: Todd Flashner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 2:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: filmscanners: to David Hemingway: SS120 Reflections at
scan borders
I was thinking of trying a Qtip dipped in acetone and run it along the two
vertical edges.
David
-Original Message-
From: Barbara White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 12:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:filmscanners: SS120: Reflections
There should not be as we are using Newton free glass as one of the two
pieces. Why only one is Newton free I frankly don't know but I am told that
is all that is necessary.
David
-Original Message-
From: Barbara White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 2:07
-Original Message-
From: Robert Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:reflections on the carrier?
Could you post this as I am digest-subscribed:
Well now I am not so sure I am seeing what I am seeing.
. So
far, I've heard nothing but good reports on the Minolta.
Joyfully, -david soderman-
101 - 200 of 554 matches
Mail list logo
