[filmscanners] Re: Kodachrome 25 versus?

2004-06-03 Thread David Lewiston
You aren't alone in being unhappy about the loss of the slow films: Zeiss complains that they can't brag about as much lens resolution any more. If you are already using a tripod, you could try 645 or 6x7. I'd think that the Fuji 100F films in 645 would look at least as good as K25 in 35mm

[filmscanners] Re: Kodachrome 25 versus?

2004-06-03 Thread David J. Littleboy
From: David Lewiston [EMAIL PROTECTED] Does Agfa still make RSX (ISO 50)? I'll have to look into this. Is it virtually grainless, like K25? I've never used it: it appears in a 2-year old brochure that happens to be sitting on my desk. Again, there's a Zeiss article* in which they kvetch

[filmscanners] Re: Kodachrome 25 versus?

2004-06-03 Thread Arthur Entlich
The demise of K-25 is a shame, but I would suggest you consider looking at the Fuji F line of films. In specific, the Provia 100F is a fairly neutral film with very fine grain which scans well. It gives you a 2 stop advantage over the K-25, as well and uses standard E-6 processing. Art David

[filmscanners] Re: Kodachrome 25 versus?

2004-06-03 Thread Berry Ives
on 6/2/04 6:39 PM, David Lewiston at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting ready for another field trip. In the past, I have always used K25 for subjects with fine detail. Imacon scans have yielded 20x prints effortlessly. K25 is no longer manufactured in the U.S. Is it still available in

[filmscanners] Re: Kodachrome 25 versus?

2004-06-03 Thread Berry Ives
on 6/2/04 6:39 PM, David Lewiston at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting ready for another field trip. In the past, I have always used K25 for subjects with fine detail. Imacon scans have yielded 20x prints effortlessly. K25 is no longer manufactured in the U.S. Is it still available in

[filmscanners] Re: Kodachrome 25 versus?

2004-06-02 Thread David J. Littleboy
From: David Lewiston [EMAIL PROTECTED] K25 is no longer manufactured in the U.S. Is it still available in other countries? Not Japan. I'm pretty sure it's ancient history everywhere. If it isn't, then I'll have to look for another slide emulsion that is also essentially grainless.

[filmscanners] Re: Kodachrome 25 versus?

2004-06-02 Thread David Lewiston
Many thanks for the suggestions. I'm not sure about 20x enlargements though: I consider 13x seriously excessive. (Hi, my name is Dave, and I'm a grain sniffer.) Imacon 5600 dpi scans from K25 make grainless giclée prints at 18 x 24, from somewhat less than full frame, hence 20X. Necessary for

[filmscanners] Re: Kodachrome 25 versus?

2004-06-02 Thread David J. Littleboy
From: David Lewiston [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm not sure about 20x enlargements though: I consider 13x seriously excessive. (Hi, my name is Dave, and I'm a grain sniffer.) Imacon 5600 dpi scans from K25 make grainless giclée prints at 18 x 24, from somewhat less than full frame, hence 20X.