> I guess you are probably a better photographer than I am.
Thank you, but I believe techniques are something that most anyone can
learn...
> I have found that
> I need help steadying the camera for maximum sharpness
So do I, but I don't use a tripod. I do most what everyone else
suggested..
r the suggestion, however!!
Guy Clark
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Turner [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 1:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Image sharpness-- Hand Held vs. Tripod Mounted (wasRE:
> 4000dpi (was fi
- Original Message -
From: "Clark Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| I shudder (shudder!) to think what I'll need to stabilize my camera when I
| get old! (er)
|
| Guy Clark
|
Why not stabilise your lenses? I was not an advocate of the Canon Image
Stabilisation lenses, until I started to use on
ED]'
> Subject: RE: Image sharpness-- Hand Held vs. Tripod Mounted (wasRE:
> 4000dpi (was film scanner mailing list))
>
>
> > Perhaps you are, indeed, uncommonly steady. If so I congratulate and
> envy
> > you. Or, perhaps (and I mean no disrespect by this
m: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 10:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Image sharpness-- Hand Held vs. Tripod Mounted (wasRE:
> 4000dpi (was film scanner mailing list))
>
>
>
> > You're both partially ri
> You're both partially right and both partially wrong!
OK, what did I say that you believe is 'partially' wrong?
> -Original Message-
> From: Austin Franklin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 10:13 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: 4000dpi (wa
Guys, Guys!
You're both partially right and both partially wrong!
SOME people can get results that are acceptable FOR THEIR PURPOSES,
shooting hand held at slow shutter speeds. SOME people can't get acceptable
results (for their purposes) even with a tripod. These latter people are
those who t
