"Tony Sleep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fuji recently launched a new version of the 400, which is supposed to be
much better
> than the previous stuff and now uses the same grain technology as the 100.
I haven't
> tried the new film, but the old was was dreadful.
Is that the source of confusion
On 21 Jan 2001 08:40:34 -0800 Frank Paris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm only going by heresay here, but what I've *heard* is that Provia 100 and
> Provia 400 are related in name only and that when you push 100 to 400, it
> has finer grain than when you use 400 directly. I would like to hear a
st thing around
at 400.
Tim A
PS, checked the good reviews on PhotographyReview
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Frank Paris
> Sent: January 21, 2001 6:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Provia 400F (Was fi
Frank wrote:
> If you could see my scans, you couldn't possibly say the grain on
> the rolls I scanned isn't so bad. Extremely disappointing. I
> subsequently went up on the PhotographyReview site to see what
> people are saying about this film and it's the same story I'm
> telling.
Compared to 1
MAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
> Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 3:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Provia 400F (Was filmsc
Frank wrote:
> [I want a good] explanation for why Provia 400 even exists, the
> grain is so bad. Maybe because some people WANT grain, for effect.
I didn't find the grain of 400F so bad at all. It seems to have
the same amorphous nature as 100F grain, so it doesn't look
anywhere near as ugly as
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001 22:09:52 +1100 Li Xia and Dale Weedman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> When you push Provia F100 to 400 do you need to modify the film
> processing/development?
Yes. 'Pushing' with E6 means increasing the first development to increase the
density of the silver image to compen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm from the old black and white school of hard knocks. If I wanted fine
> grain I shot a slow film, asa 50 or slower. For a higher speed and still fine
> grain Tri-X.
With "fast" Provia 100F there isn't much grain to look at. :-)
>
> If I wanted a tighter grain in
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Provia 400F (Was filmscanners: orange mask)
I'm from the old black and white school of hard knocks. If I wanted fine
grain I shot a slow film, asa 50 or slower. For a higher speed and still
fine
grain Tri-X.
If I wanted a tighter grain in Provia why wouldn't I s
I'm from the old black and white school of hard knocks. If I wanted fine
grain I shot a slow film, asa 50 or slower. For a higher speed and still fine
grain Tri-X.
If I wanted a tighter grain in Provia why wouldn't I shoot 400 instread of
pushing 100 to 400?
"Li Xia and Dale Weedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you push Provia F100 to 400 do you need to modify the film
> processing/development?
Absolutely, yes, otherwise you aren't "pushing" the film.
Rob
When you push Provia F100 to 400 do you need to modify the film
processing/development?
Dale W
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Paris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Forget it unless what you are after is highly visible grain. If you don't
> want absolutely appalling grain but want the speed, it
12 matches
Mail list logo
