> I guess you are probably a better photographer than I am.
Thank you, but I believe techniques are something that most anyone can
learn...
> I have found that
> I need help steadying the camera for maximum sharpness
So do I, but I don't use a tripod. I do most what everyone else
suggested..
r the suggestion, however!!
Guy Clark
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Turner [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 1:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Image sharpness-- Hand Held vs. Tripod Mounted (wasRE:
> 4000dpi (was fi
- Original Message -
From: "Clark Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| I shudder (shudder!) to think what I'll need to stabilize my camera when I
| get old! (er)
|
| Guy Clark
|
Why not stabilise your lenses? I was not an advocate of the Canon Image
Stabilisation lenses, until I started to use on
ED]'
> Subject: RE: Image sharpness-- Hand Held vs. Tripod Mounted (wasRE:
> 4000dpi (was film scanner mailing list))
>
>
> > Perhaps you are, indeed, uncommonly steady. If so I congratulate and
> envy
> > you. Or, perhaps (and I mean no disrespect by this
m: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 10:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Image sharpness-- Hand Held vs. Tripod Mounted (wasRE:
> 4000dpi (was film scanner mailing list))
>
>
>
> > You're both partially ri
> You're both partially right and both partially wrong!
OK, what did I say that you believe is 'partially' wrong?
> -Original Message-
> From: Austin Franklin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 10:13 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: 4000dpi (wa
