the LS-2000.
=Steve Caspersen
- Original Message -
From: Dale Gail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 3:10 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII
You can get it from the following URL:
http://www.nikontechusa.com/
Dale
From
Hi Hersch,
were did you get NikonScan 3.0?
regards,
Andi
You can get it from the following URL:
http://www.nikontechusa.com/
Dale
From: Andreas Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Hersch,
were did you get NikonScan 3.0?
regards,
Andi
, April 29, 2001 3:10 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII
You can get it from the following URL:
http://www.nikontechusa.com/
Dale
From: Andreas Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Hersch,
were did you get NikonScan 3.0?
regards,
Andi
I couldn't say. I think there are people on this list that have tried it
with the LS30 and LS2000.
Dale
From: Steve Caspersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This site says that you should not use Nikonscan 3.0 with the LS-2000? Is
this true? The site indicates that later versions of Nikonscan 3.0 will
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/27/2001 7:43:30 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I found by accident that there is a huge difference between 48-bit 2700
ppi scans on
my LS-30 (where that should have been more than enough) and 64-bit,
2700
ppi settings.
As in 64bit is far
In a message dated 4/28/2001 10:37:13 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not wanting to reply with an obvious observation, I would have
thought picking the 64bit option simply enabled scanning the IR, and
there for Hersch's improved dust removal. Can you elaborate on what
you found? Is
Ed writes ...
In a message dated 4/27/2001 7:43:30 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I found by
accident that there is a huge difference between 48-bit 2700 ppi
scans on
my LS-30 (where that should have been more than enough) and
64-bit, 2700
ppi settings.
I looked at the code,
Get some sleep, Ed.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII
| In a message dated 4/28/2001 10:37:13 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Not wanting to reply
You're very welcome. I'm in no hurry to reinstall NS, either 2.5 or 3.0
Hersch
At 03:26 AM 04/28/2001 -0400, you wrote:
In a message dated 4/27/2001 7:43:30 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I found by
accident that there is a huge difference between 48-bit 2700 ppi scans on
my LS-30
In a message dated 4/26/2001 11:00:45 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I haven't tried Nikonscan 3, since it reportedly does not
deliver hi-bit scan data.
Not with the LS30. It should with the LS2000 or the LS4000 and LS8000.
I think the LS40 may also be bit depth hobbled?
The
Ed made some changes to IR cleaning between Vuescan 6.7.5 and the
7.0 series. I find many instances of incomplete scratch cleaning
from LS-30 in 7.x that are completely removed using 6.7.5. Still
true with 7.0.14. ...
...
It seems to me Ed also made a change during that period of
With regard to Vuescan cleaning and ROC in version 7.0+, I found by
accident that there is a huge difference between 48-bit 2700 ppi scans on
my LS-30 (where that should have been more than enough) and 64-bit, 2700
ppi settings. In the former, the filters didn't seem to work worth sour
Compared to Vuescan, scratch removal is much better
Ed made some changes to IR cleaning between Vuescan 6.7.5 and the 7.0 series. I find
many instances of incomplete scratch cleaning from LS-30 in 7.x that are completely
removed using 6.7.5. Still true with 7.0.14. I haven't tried Nikonscan
Bob Shomler writes ...
Ed made some changes to IR cleaning between Vuescan 6.7.5 and the
7.0 series. I find many instances of incomplete scratch cleaning
from LS-30 in 7.x that are completely removed using 6.7.5. Still
true with 7.0.14. ...
... I sent Ed a note a month ago describing
: Thursday, April 26, 2001 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII
Compared to Vuescan, scratch removal is much better
Ed made some changes to IR cleaning between Vuescan 6.7.5 and the 7.0
series. I find many instances of incomplete scratch cleaning from LS-30 in
7.x
Michael wrote:
It seems to me Ed also made a change during that period of versions, the
result being his IR dust removal had absolutely no effect on areas of the
image where no dust was present (no softening). Have you also compared
those areas???
In my experience on the LS30, any cleaning
17 matches
Mail list logo
