In a message dated 9/20/2000 7:17:24 PM EST,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The light in
the middle of the film is usually 20% brighter than the light at
the edges. The intensity calibration takes care of this.
Do you know of any scanners that use a physical means to even out the
ED writes ...
In a message dated 9/18/2000 8:58:13 AM EST,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe Vuescan does make some
adjustments to the raw scan based on its calibration of
the scanner
and its understanding of the generic scanner space,
which might in
turn make using the
shAF wrote:
For the sake of archiving LS2000 scans, I've been trying to find the
right wide-gamut color space.
For archiving purposes I'm saving the raw LS30 scans from vuescan.
That way if the cropping tools improve later, I have the raw data
to work with. It's not limited by colour space.
Rob writes ...
shAF wrote:
For the sake of archiving LS2000 scans, I've been trying to find
the
right wide-gamut color space.
For archiving purposes I'm saving the raw LS30 scans from vuescan.
That way if the cropping tools improve later, I have the raw data
to work with. It's not
Rob writes ...
shAF wrote:
How do you designate "raw" with Vuescan? My most recent trials
with v.6.0 and v.6.1 insist I choose a color space(?) I haven't yet
figured out how to defeat it(?)
Select the "output raw scan" option in the output tab.
Even if "adobe RGB" or "PhotoCD" is selected,
shAF wrote:
Thanx ... but it sure is ugly!! ...*smile*...
That's because it's the raw unadjusted data.
NKLS2000LS30_P_SDC.icm ..., and it looks damn good!!! ... ^but^ I am
ending up with too much blue, and too little green in the neutral
areas ... the gray border and the grayscale.
You'd
