Larry wrote:
>Anyone want to buy a 32MB NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 4X AGPGraphics Card???
You said you were getting rid of this card to replace it with a two head one, as I
remember, but otherwise would you recommend the GeForce2 MX card, from some
manufacturer or another, for we filmscanner people?
C
Colin,
I've not yet used the card. It was the least expensive option when ordering
my new system from Dell. I went that route because I had planned on getting
a dual monitor card anyway. That being said, I'm sure it's fine for
graphics. It just doesn't support dual monitors which is my prefere
"Colin Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Anyone want to buy a 32MB NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 4X AGPGraphics Card???
> You said you were getting rid of this card to replace it with a two head
one, as I
> remember, but otherwise would you recommend the GeForce2 MX card, from
> some manufacturer or ano
Rob writes ...
> "Colin Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Anyone want to buy a 32MB NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 4X AGPGraphics
Card???
> > You said you were getting rid of this card to replace it with a
two head
> one, as I
> > remember, but otherwise would you recommend the GeForce2 MX card,
from
Larry,
Thanks for the reply about the GeForce2 MX graphics card. Hope it wasn't too
hard tearing yourself away from the new computer to make it ;-).
There's no doubt that the Matrox G450 is a good card, Tom's Hardware site particularly
mentions the "excellent 2D performance and razor s
"shAf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since when did video cards or their drivers become capable of CM,
> or need to be ICM aware? Rather, the video card and its driver,
> simply need make available the color LUT so CM
> characterization/calibration softwares like Adobe Gamma can modify it.
Do
Both the G450 and the dual-head GeForce cards use a slower less-capable
DAC for the second port, so it can't manage quite the same resolution /
refresh rate combination.
If you want the truly ultimate multi-monitor system you have to find an
adaptor available as AGP _and_ PCI and use two or mo
Rob writes ...
> Does it matter how it's done? The point is that some cards *cannot*
adjust
> the gamma to give a correct display. ...
You mean they don't make their CLUT available for ^any^ software's
ability to adjust it, which hasn't much to do with CM. CM takes over
simply because the
