Hi everybody,
sorry for the long-winded subject. My LS-30 has just quit service, very
likely beyond what I'd consider worth while a repair. I have been
planning for another unit anyway, so the point is just that I have to
make up my mind a little earlier than I thought.
The LS-2000 and the
I can only answer for the LS2000 - to confirm:
a) my perception of the blown highlights and its cure is exactly as you
stated it,
b) even with LS3.1 which I use on my LS2000, the option for lo-contrast
neutral is still there, so I think it would meet your needs.
c) having asked this kind of
Julian Robinson wrote:
BTW I emailed Nikon in Australia about exactly this question (how does the
LS40/4000 handle the blown highlights problem) and you can guess their
totally useless reply - what blown highlights?, we have many satisfied
users and no-one has ever complained ... blah
- Original Message -
From: Julian Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Replacement of Nikon LS-30: LS-40 or LS-2000
(especially as to clipped negative highlights)?
BTW I emailed Nikon in Australia about
I see you are in Oz, so better say that I only got a reply after I spoke to
them by phone, and told them that I had NOT got a reply previously. And I
was only speaking to them by phone because I had one of their scanners on
my desk (i.e. they owned it, mine was here as well) and thus they had
