At 11:10 03/12/01, Bernhard wrote:
>I observed blown out highlight with some of my b&w scansI do at work wiht the
>LS-40, but this could of course be as well the negs that are over- exposed.
>I will check again if there is something to do...
>Maybe in VueScan it is better - I will try out next wee
I see you are in Oz, so better say that I only got a reply after I spoke to
them by phone, and told them that I had NOT got a reply previously. And I
was only speaking to them by phone because I had one of their scanners on
my desk (i.e. they owned it, mine was here as well) and thus they had a
- Original Message -
From: "Julian Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Replacement of Nikon LS-30: LS-40 or LS-2000
(especially as to clipped negative highlights)?
>
> BTW
Julian Robinson wrote:
>
> BTW I emailed Nikon in Australia about exactly this question (how does the
> LS40/4000 handle the blown highlights problem) and you can guess their
> totally useless reply - "what blown highlights?, we have many satisfied
> users and no-one has ever complained ... bla
I can only answer for the LS2000 - to confirm:
a) my perception of the blown highlights and its cure is exactly as you
stated it,
b) even with LS3.1 which I use on my LS2000, the option for lo-contrast
neutral is still there, so I think it would meet your needs.
c) having asked this kind of q
Hi everybody,
sorry for the long-winded subject. My LS-30 has just quit service, very
likely beyond what I'd consider worth while a repair. I have been
planning for another unit anyway, so the point is just that I have to
make up my mind a little earlier than I thought.
The LS-2000 and the LS-40
