Wondering if we have any users of the new kodak rfs 3600. I had asked a few
weeks ago. Hopefully there are more in the pipeline by now. Looking for
opinions and or reviews. Have been holding back buying a scanner. The specs
look great for the money. But i'm leery about buying it without feedbac
FYI and FWIW... I have Minolta Scan Elite (which comes with D-ICE) and have been
playing with it for about two weeks... Have scanned old negs (Tri-X) from the
60's, Kodachrome and lots of color negs (Reala shot under mixed light). I use the
Minolta Software, 16 bit auto exposure with ICE turned on
Michael,
Can you batch scan slides with the Elite?
Thanks
Dale
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: opinions kodak rfs 3600 scanner Vs Minolta du
lf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 3:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: opinions kodak rfs 3600 scanner Vs Minolta dual
II
Wondering if we have any users of the new kodak rfs 3600. I had asked a few
weeks ago. Hopefully there are more in the pipeline b
-
> From: "Michael Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 1:04 AM
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: opinions kodak rfs 3600 scanner Vs Minolta dual
> II
>
> > FYI and FWIW... I have Minolta Scan Elite (whi
Thursday, November 30, 2000 3:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: filmscanners: opinions kodak rfs 3600 scanner Vs Minolta dual
> II
>
> Wondering if we have any users of the new kodak rfs 3600. I had asked a few
> weeks ago. Hopefully there are more in the pipeline by now.
imble
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: opinions kodak rfs 3600 scanner Vs Minolta
dual II
Ditto Spencer,
I also bought the RFS3600 scanner. I think that I was the first person
on the list to get one. I agree with your comments. The software i
I had heard that Kodak has been having some problems with the rfs3600
software. Just can't understand why these things aren't thoughly field tested
before being released to the public. Since I am not that knowledgable about
computerease. It does concern me. I read another post that focus might
ECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: opinions kodak rfs 3600 scanner Vs Minolta
dual II
I had heard that Kodak has been having some problems with the rfs3600
software. Just can't understand why these things aren't thoughly field
tested
before being released to the public. Since I am not th
; > Can you batch scan slides with the Elite?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Dale
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Michael Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 1:04 AM
Spencer,
> Just out of curiosity, how fast are you able to scan the images? I am
> running a AMD K6 450 with 384M of ram. I am able to prescan a roll of 36
> between 10 and 11 minutes, and it is taking me just over 2 hours for the
> strip to be scanned at 3600 dpi.
I too am running an AMD 450
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I had heard that Kodak has been having some problems with the rfs3600
> software. Just can't understand why these things aren't thoughly field tested
> before being released to the public. Since I am not that knowledgable about
> computerease. It does concern me.
Dav
PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: opinions kodak rfs 3600 scanner Vs Minolta
> dual II
>
>
> I had heard that Kodak has been having some problems with the rfs3600
> software. Just can't understand why these things aren't thoughly
> fie
13 matches
Mail list logo
