At 5:40 pm + 12/31/03, Robert Patterson wrote:
The OS9 Finder compensates in two interdependent ways: one is that
when you click on a window, all windows for that app come foreward.
One can argue the pros and con of this, but it does make the Expose
functionality less necessary, especially
On 01.01.2004 9:39 Uhr, Dennis W. Manasco wrote
I never really feel at home under OS X unless I also have Classic
Menu ($10.00 from Sig Software) installed. IMHO it is the best and
most trouble-free of the Apple Menu replacements, and a great place
to store commonly accessed folders and
Yes, I can certainly understand the screen rotation problem.
On 31.12.2003 18:40 Uhr, Robert Patterson wrote
The thing is, I'm still more productive in OS9. U.I. doodads are uninteresting
to me in themselves, so I'm happier in OS9 when doing real work. Expose (which
I don't have) sounds
On Wednesday, Dec 31, 2003, at 09:40 US/Pacific, Robert Patterson wrote:
Expose (which I don't have) sounds incredibly useful for OSX, but the
OS9 Finder needs it less than the OSX Finder does. (The OS9 Finder
compensates in two interdependent ways: one is that when you click on
a window, all
