RE: [Finale] OT - Beat vs. pulse (previously: 3/8 time sig).

2003-06-13 Thread Michael Edwards
[Brad Beyenhof:] On Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:17 PM, Michael Edwards wrote: I learned that the beat was the primary unit of rhythm, and that you could term subdivisions of that pulses. Am I wrong on this? Or can you have it either way? I would've thought the same (and I originally had

Re: [Finale] OT - Beat vs. pulse (previously: 3/8 time sig).

2003-06-13 Thread David H. Bailey
Michael Edwards wrote: [snip] It still sounds wrong: I mean, we say phrases like on the third beat - not on the third pulse. I'm not sure what we call the subdivisions, and a generic term for them doesn't seem to be heard much. Thinking about it, I would probably just say the third

Re: [Finale] OT - Beat vs. pulse (previously: 3/8 time sig).

2003-06-13 Thread David W. Fenton
On 13 Jun 2003 at 4:54, David H. Bailey wrote: When it gets time to learn about 6/8 time, I keep the same explanation. At first, of course, they learn counting 6/8 music in 6, but when we start to work on counting it in 2, I invariably get the question about why isn't there a 2 in the

Re: [Finale] OT - Beat vs. pulse (previously: 3/8 time sig).

2003-06-13 Thread Brad Beyenhof
on 6/13/03 9:17 AM, David W. Fenton wrote: On 13 Jun 2003 at 4:54, David H. Bailey wrote: When it gets time to learn about 6/8 time, I keep the same explanation. At first, of course, they learn counting 6/8 music in 6, but when we start to work on counting it in 2, I invariably get the

Re: [Finale] OT - Beat vs. pulse (previously: 3/8 time sig).

2003-06-13 Thread Michael Edwards
[David W. Fenton:] I don't see any point in distinguishing beat and pulse. If you're trying to perform a piece in a manner in which the pulse does not come out the same as the notated beat, either you're playing it wrong or it's one of those special cases where we don't interpret the notation

Re: [Finale] OT - Beat vs. pulse (previously: 3/8 time sig).

2003-06-13 Thread David W. Fenton
On 14 Jun 2003 at 6:05, Michael Edwards wrote: [David W. Fenton:] I don't see any point in distinguishing beat and pulse. If you're trying to perform a piece in a manner in which the pulse does not come out the same as the notated beat, either you're playing it wrong or it's one of those

Re: [Finale] OT - Beat vs. pulse (previously: 3/8 time sig).

2003-06-12 Thread Michael Edwards
[Brad Beyenhof:] Compound meters have three beats per pulse: 6/8, 9/8, 6/4 (sometimes)... I would have thought proper terminology would be three pulses per beat. I learned that the beat was the primary unit of rhythm, and that you could term subdivisions of that pulses. Am I wrong on

RE: [Finale] OT - Beat vs. pulse (previously: 3/8 time sig).

2003-06-12 Thread Brad Beyenhof
I accidentally sent this only to Michael this morning (6/12). Here it is again for the list: On Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:17 PM, Michael Edwards wrote: [Brad Beyenhof:] Compound meters have three beats per pulse: 6/8, 9/8, 6/4 (sometimes)... I would have thought proper

RE: [Finale] OT - Beat vs. pulse (previously: 3/8 time sig).

2003-06-12 Thread Randolph Peters
Brad Beyenhof wrote: On Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:17 PM, Michael Edwards wrote: [Brad Beyenhof:] Compound meters have three beats per pulse: 6/8, 9/8, 6/4 (sometimes)... I would have thought proper terminology would be three pulses per beat. I learned that the beat was the primary