Philip Aker wrote:
>
> Best wishes from the Big 4 Ranch,
>
> Philip Aker
>
Bach, Beethoven, Brahms and Cage?
;-)
Ch.S.
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
At 2:16 PM -0700 6/01/02, Harold Owen wrote:
>
>Schenker holds that the only really strong root movement is by
>falling fifth (or rising fourth). The Plagal Cadence, however, in my
>ear is also very strong. Much of Renaissance music treats the
>falling fourth (or rising fifth) as if it is just
On Saturday, June 1, 2002, at 02:37 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
> On 1 Jun 2002, at 14:16, Harold Owen wrote:
>> Schenker holds that the only really strong root movement is by
>> falling fifth (or rising fourth). The Plagal Cadence, however, in my
>> ear is also very strong. Much of Renaissance
David Fenton writes:
>I suspect that Schenker would actually parse the [Pachelbel Canon]
>progression as:
>
> I , V - vi, iii - IV, I - IV - V :||
>
>That means that it's not a falling 4th, but a deceptive resolution of a
>rising fourth.
>
>The structural chords are I - vi - IV - V - I. The ot
On 1 Jun 2002, at 14:16, Harold Owen wrote:
> Schenker holds that the only really strong root movement is by
> falling fifth (or rising fourth). The Plagal Cadence, however, in my
> ear is also very strong. Much of Renaissance music treats the falling
> fourth (or rising fifth) as if it is jus
Jamin Hoffman writes:
>Dear all -
>
>Pardon me for asking what should be a simple question - BUT:
>
>One of my theory teachers once told me the three most common intervals of
>root movement in chord progressions. I know I ought to be able to figure
>this out through reasoning and other thought p
