I also have stayed with Acrobat 4. Upgrades are too expensive and 4 does all
I need. Occaionally I find a pdf that 4 will not open so I have Reader 5 and
Reader 6 available.
Richard Yates
>In light of the swinish girth of Acrobat 5 and the godzilla-proportions of
Acrobat 6 (including the reade
On Wednesday, Sep 3, 2003, at 10:36 US/Pacific, Tim Thompson wrote:
I was pretty impressed with the demo of Preview under Panther at
MacWorld in July. It is much faster than the current incarnation, and
s much faster than Acrobat reader (I think the demo compared it to
version 6??). I don
On Wednesday, Sep 3, 2003, at 08:08 US/Pacific, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Although I do use Reader 5 (and I like it for the anti-aliasing) I
convert only to Reader 3 Format usually (ie PDF V 1.2). I see no point
using later versions, certainly as far as music is concerned. Is > there?
The only thi
On 03.09.2003 19:06 Uhr, Harold Owen wrote
> I'm using Acrobat 4 because the screen output is far superior to
> Acrobat 5 on my iMac running System 9.2. I don't like the girth of
> Acrobat 5 or 6 either, and I'm still using Word 5 for the same
> reason. I too will probably move to Acrobat 5 when I
At 9/3/2003 01:41 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Brad Beyenhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> And where is it available for
> >> download these days?
>
>All available Reader versions, straight from Adobe:
>
>http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/alternate.html
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Brad Beyenhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> And where is it available for
>> download these days?
All available Reader versions, straight from Adobe:
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/alternate.html
Acrobat 3 for OS/2 Warp, anybody?
Aaron.
___
On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, at 01:15 PM, Robert Patterson Finale
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Brad Beyenhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is the
advantage of 4 over 5, in your opinion?
Speed, speed, and speed. Reader 4 launches in a fraction of the time
of 5 and esp. <> 6.
I w
Robert Patterson writes:
In light of the swinish girth of Acrobat 5 and the
godzilla-proportions of Acrobat 6 (including the readers), I've been
eschewing these formats in favor of PDF level 4. I'm wondering if
anyone else is, and if anyone beside me is sticking with Reader 4.
(Well, I'm using
> -Original Message-
> From: Brad Beyenhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What is the
> advantage of 4 over 5, in your opinion?
Speed, speed, and speed. Reader 4 launches in a fraction of the time of 5 and esp.
<> 6.
> And where is it available for
> download these days?
>
You might fi
At 9/3/2003 11:42 AM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
>I use Acrobat Reader 5 on OS 9.2.2, OS X, and WinXP. What is the
>advantage of 4 over 5, in your opinion? And where is it available for
>download these days?
I can't imagine there are any.
I had V4 on my system until recently, when it couldn't read se
On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, at 07:32 AM, Robert Patterson Finale
wrote:
In light of the swinish girth of Acrobat 5 and the
godzilla-proportions of Acrobat 6 (including the readers), I've been
eschewing these formats in favor of PDF level 4. I'm wondering if
anyone else is, and if anyone
On 03.09.2003 16:32 Uhr, Robert Patterson Finale wrote
> In light of the swinish girth of Acrobat 5 and the godzilla-proportions of
> Acrobat 6 (including the readers), I've been eschewing these formats in favor
> of PDF level 4. I'm wondering if anyone else is, and if anyone beside me is
> sticki
In light of the swinish girth of Acrobat 5 and the godzilla-proportions of Acrobat 6
(including the readers), I've been eschewing these formats in favor of PDF level 4.
I'm wondering if anyone else is, and if anyone beside me is sticking with Reader 4.
(Well, I'm using reader 5 on OSX because it
13 matches
Mail list logo
