On Saturday, March 22, 2003, at 12:00 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Dennis Bathory-Kitsz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat Mar 22, 2003 7:58:28 AM US/Central
Subject: Re: [Finale] Re: TAN: Sound recording
At 06:49 PM 3/22/03 +1100, One of the McKays wrote:
Is there a way I can get better play
Yesterday I purchased a pair of Audio Technica condensor mikes and an Alto 6
channel sound mixer and did some recording with my computer, using Cool Edit
2000 [demo]. I burned a CD of 3 piano pieces and I was impressed with the
results.
I was also impressed with the range of the mike [one is yet t
At 3:03 PM -0500 3/02/03, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, at 08:36 AM, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
iPods can handle CD-quality audio? I have been under the impression
that iPods operate with compressed audio, like MP3s.
The iPod can play back both compressed (MP3) and uncompre
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, at 08:36 AM, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
iPods can handle CD-quality audio? I have been under the impression
that iPods operate with compressed audio, like MP3s.
The iPod can play back both compressed (MP3) and uncompressed (AIFF,
WAV) audio. The next generation of iP
Great tip, thanks Johannes!
> On 02.03.2003 18:07 Uhr, Doug Auwarter wrote
>
>> As usual, I hit the "reply" button and it went to Johannes only. Perhaps I
>> will one day get used to how this particular list/serv works. Sorry for the
>> duplicate messages, Johannes!
>
> No problem. However, I th
On 02.03.2003 18:07 Uhr, Doug Auwarter wrote
> As usual, I hit the "reply" button and it went to Johannes only. Perhaps I
> will one day get used to how this particular list/serv works. Sorry for the
> duplicate messages, Johannes!
No problem. However, I think you are using Outlook Express 5 for
As usual, I hit the "reply" button and it went to Johannes only. Perhaps I
will one day get used to how this particular list/serv works. Sorry for the
duplicate messages, Johannes!
on 3/2/03 2:52 AM, Johannes Gebauer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When it works it's great - no copying from DATs to
> a certain risk of loosing complete recordings ...
Obviously any serious recording endeavor will use a backup system, i.e. DAT
+ MiniDisk or Hard Disk + DAT or whatever. No medium is safe.
Cheers,
Tobias
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
On 02.03.2003 15:14 Uhr, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote
> I used to be a big fan of DAT, but my experience has taught me otherwise.
> It had its day, but I think that day is over; I look forward to being able
> to retire it in favor of a laptop. Here are the typical problems with DAT,
> and why I do n
I used to be a big fan of DAT, but my experience has taught me otherwise.
It had its day, but I think that day is over; I look forward to being able
to retire it in favor of a laptop. Here are the typical problems with DAT,
and why I do not recommend it anymore.
1. Transport issues. Tapes don't a
At 10:45 AM +0100 3/02/03, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
1) MDs are much cheaper than DAT (I mean the media not the recorder)
Hmm, MD recorders too are cheaper than DAT recorders, as far as I
know, so cheaper overall.
2) There are rudimentary editing capabilities on a MD, editing out pauses,
etc.
3)
At 4:55 AM -0500 3/02/03, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, at 03:52 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
I don't quite follow this argumentation: It is true that HD based digital
recorders have advantages to DATs, but they still have some disadvantages as
well. Obviously reliability is a
At 03:01 AM 3/2/03 -0500, Darcy James Argue wrote:
>Also, Richard, I'm curious -- what do you use the deck for? I always
>thought the main appeal of MiniDisc recorders is their small size and
>portability
To answer the question from our POV: The deck in the radio station air
studio is used to r
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, at 03:52 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
I don't quite follow this argumentation: It is true that HD based
digital
recorders have advantages to DATs, but they still have some
disadvantages as
well. Obviously reliability is actually _the_ factor in any recording
environment
On 01.03.2003 23:38 Uhr, Matthew Hindson Fastmail Account wrote
> Minidisc recorders on sale now can now record at 44.1 KHz, which is nice.
> I'm assuming that this means no compression is used.
That's nonsense. MD is compressed, otherwise you would only fit about 10
minutes on the disk. As far a
On 01.03.2003 23:49 Uhr, Carlberg Jones wrote
>> Just make sure that you don't buy the microphone which plugs directly into
>> the side of the machine, as you get the mechanical noise of the recorder
>> itself.
>
> I plug my microphone directly into my Sharp 722 MD and there's no
> mechanical noi
On 02.03.2003 9:01 Uhr, Darcy James Argue wrote
> Right -- I meant *portable* MiniDisc recorder. Do you happen to know
> if there are any of those with digital out?
>
> Also, Richard, I'm curious -- what do you use the deck for? I always
> thought the main appeal of MiniDisc recorders is their
On 01.03.2003 21:53 Uhr, Charles Turner wrote
> Firewire has been completely solid for me. While I haven't tried it I'm
> skeptical about using USB for serious digital audio recording. I have
> read a review however, saying that the USB 2-channel Digidesign Mbox
> with Protools LE works well.
Ev
On 01.03.2003 10:36 Uhr, Darcy James Argue wrote
> It seems obvious that this is the direction portable digital recording
> is moving in. The MiniDisc is based on obsolete technology, and DAT
> recorders are inferior to a hard-drive based recorder in every way
> (except, arguably, reliability, bu
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, at 12:00 AM, Richard Yates wrote:
My Sony MiniDisk deck JB940 has digital out (and optical digital out).
Richard Yates
Darcy James Argue wrote:
...To the best of my
knowledge, no MiniDisc recorder is capable of recording uncompressed
digital audio, and none is capable
My Sony MiniDisk deck JB940 has digital out (and optical digital out).
Richard Yates
Darcy James Argue wrote:
>>...To the best of my
>> knowledge, no MiniDisc recorder is capable of recording uncompressed
>> digital audio, and none is capable of outputting digital audio of
>> any kind (unless th
At 9:44 PM -0500 3/1/03, David H. Bailey wrote:
>I think what he meant is the sort of microphone without any cable, sort
>of a snap-on mike that is too close to the unit and picks up the
>mechanical sounds of the recorder.
Like I was saying, there is no mechanical sound, between you and me.
There
I think what he meant is the sort of microphone without any cable, sort
of a snap-on mike that is too close to the unit and picks up the
mechanical sounds of the recorder.
Carlberg Jones wrote:
At 9:38 AM +1100 3/2/03, Matthew Hindson Fastmail Account wrote:
Just make sure that you don't buy th
On Saturday, March 1, 2003, at 05:38 PM, Matthew Hindson Fastmail
Account wrote:
Minidisc recorders on sale now can now record at 44.1 KHz, which is
nice.
I'm assuming that this means no compression is used.
That would be an incorrect assumption. The sampling rate is just the
sampling rate, i
On Saturday, March 1, 2003, at 05:49 PM, Carlberg Jones wrote:
At 9:38 AM +1100 3/2/03, Matthew Hindson Fastmail Account wrote:
Just make sure that you don't buy the microphone which plugs directly
into
the side of the machine, as you get the mechanical noise of the
recorder
itself.
I plug my m
At 9:38 AM +1100 3/2/03, Matthew Hindson Fastmail Account wrote:
>Just make sure that you don't buy the microphone which plugs directly into
>the side of the machine, as you get the mechanical noise of the recorder
>itself.
I plug my microphone directly into my Sharp 722 MD and there's no
mechanic
> Subject: [Finale] TAN: Sound recording
>
> I would like to record accompaniments for students and performances of
> students and am looking for advice, please.
>
>
> I am also interested in Mini Disk recorders. I like the idea of being
able
> to take your little player
On Saturday, March 1, 2003, at 12:00 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Johannes Gebauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat Mar 1, 2003 1:56:37 AM US/Central
On 01.03.2003 2:17 Uhr, Darcy James Argue wrote
If you already have a laptop, you should forget all of the above and
go
for either a good-q
At 08:56 AM 3/1/03 +0100, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
>On 01.03.2003 0:45 Uhr, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote
>
>> A 256MB card
>> will record about 50 minutes of uncompressed audio.
>
>How? 50 minutes of CD quality stereo take approximately 500 MB.
Sorry -- yes, I meant 512MB card. Not quite economical y
At 08:56 AM 3/1/03 +0100, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
>DATs are much more reliable and fool proof.
This isn't true, at least in terms of reliability. Fools, well, I don't
know. I've had my own issues. :)
I can't imagine what issues WDR had that would take a recording computer
down for several hours.
On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 08:33 PM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
At 08:17 PM 2/28/03 -0500, Darcy James Argue wrote:
What would be really great would be an iPod-like device with a line in
for a mic. It wouldn't be difficult for Apple to add this feature,
and
it would completely destroy th
On 01.03.2003 0:45 Uhr, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote
> A 256MB card
> will record about 50 minutes of uncompressed audio.
How? 50 minutes of CD quality stereo take approximately 500 MB.
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
___
On 01.03.2003 2:17 Uhr, Darcy James Argue wrote
> If you already have a laptop, you should forget all of the above and go
> for either a good-quality USB microphone or an external USB or Firewire
> mixer that accepts mic inputs. This will allow you to record digital
> audio directly to your hard
On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 09:17 PM, One of the McKays wrote:
Thanks for all the advice, folks.
I am disappointed you can't transfer the stuff via USB cable to your
computer, like I do with my digital camera. I guess the files would be
a lot
bigger.
No. It's got nothing to do with the siz
Thanks for all the advice, folks.
I am disappointed you can't transfer the stuff via USB cable to your
computer, like I do with my digital camera. I guess the files would be a lot
bigger.
Doesn't sound like one of these is what I'm looking for.
Maybe I should get a laptop.
David McKay
[EMAIL PROTE
On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 04:39 PM, One of the McKays wrote:
Thanks for your reply, David.
Don't understand the necessity for buying a very expensive mike.
David, the microphone is the most crucial part of the sound recording
chain. Even with a MiniDisc recorder, with its audio compressi
At 08:17 PM 2/28/03 -0500, Darcy James Argue wrote:
>What would be really great would be an iPod-like device with a line in
>for a mic. It wouldn't be difficult for Apple to add this feature, and
>it would completely destroy the market for those crappy MiniDisc
>recorders.
It's called Nomad.
h
At 8:39 AM +1100 3/01/03, One of the McKays wrote:
Thanks for your reply, David.
Don't understand the necessity for buying a very expensive mike.
My computer is a Pentium II 300 mhz .
The specs page for the Sony Walkman minidisk says they require a 400 mhz
computer. I am wondering if they mean that
On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 04:06 PM, One of the McKays wrote:
I would like to record accompaniments for students and performances of
students and am looking for advice, please.
One thought is a digital video camera. I was knocked out by the sound
quality from a Sony camera recording 2 flute
At 11:18 PM 2/28/03 +0100, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
>The
>bottle neck will probably be the built in mic preamp, but to get a decent
>combination of mic and preamp your are looking at an investment of several
>thousand dollars US.
Depends on your golden ears. :)
A pair of Oktava O12 mics and a Behr
We use Canon GL-1 DV camcorders, with an attachment that allows stereo XLR
inputs into the mic input on the camcorder. Works great. And the newer
GL-2 has the XLR inputs built in from what I understand.
The Shure VP-88 is a great stereo mic, and can be had for around $800,
including battery (whi
On 28.02.2003 22:06 Uhr, One of the McKays wrote
> I would like to record accompaniments for students and performances of
> students and am looking for advice, please.
>
> One thought is a digital video camera. I was knocked out by the sound
> quality from a Sony camera recording 2 flutes and pia
Thanks for your reply, David.
Don't understand the necessity for buying a very expensive mike.
My computer is a Pentium II 300 mhz .
The specs page for the Sony Walkman minidisk says they require a 400 mhz
computer. I am wondering if they mean that less will be slow, or if my low
speed computer wo
From what I have heard, you are correct about the mikes not being
included with the minidisk recorders and in order to be able to download
digitally to the computer you need to buy a very expensive one. Of
course the short time the signal would be in the analog world from
minidisk recorder to
I would like to record accompaniments for students and performances of
students and am looking for advice, please.
One thought is a digital video camera. I was knocked out by the sound
quality from a Sony camera recording 2 flutes and piano with its own
microphone a couple of years back.
I am als
45 matches
Mail list logo
