Re: [Finale] paper (was Selling music on line)

2003-02-09 Thread David H. Bailey
Good point -- but the stuff will still be archived as the technology changes and I can still run MusicPrinterPlus on my P4-1.8GHz and still open, edit, and print files from it. And I was using that 12 years ago. I installed a 3.5" drive in the computer that was running MPP, and was able to tr

Re: [Finale] paper (was Selling music on line)

2003-02-09 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 09.02.2003 23:17 Uhr, Carlberg Jones wrote > At 11:03 PM +0100 2/9/03, Johannes Gebauer wrote: >> Well, yes, but even if you backed up your stuff fifteen years ago with the >> complete application with it, chances are _very_ high that you won't be able >> to find a machine easily that will read

Re: [Finale] paper (was Selling music on line)

2003-02-09 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 09.02.2003 19:09 Uhr, David H. Bailey wrote > And you can always put the pdf reader on each CD as you archive your > files so that as long as there is a computer that can run the code you > will have access to your files, even if Adobe has gone the way of the > dodo bird. Well, yes, but even i

Re: [Finale] paper (was Selling music on line)

2003-02-09 Thread Cecil Rigby
> There's a list of basis sizes at > http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/don/dt/dt0246.html Also see http://www.inkjetkits.com/weight.html I use the very same paper/weight as Robert Patterson. It seems a little dubious to go to the extra expense for acid-free papers, but *this* one has exceptional dur

Re: [Finale] paper (was Selling music on line)

2003-02-09 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
At 01:09 PM 2/9/03 -0500, David H. Bailey wrote: >And you can always put the pdf reader on each CD as you archive your >files so that as long as there is a computer that can run the code you >will have access to your files, even if Adobe has gone the way of the >dodo bird. This is just not that

Re: [Finale] paper (was Selling music on line)

2003-02-09 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 10:43 AM 02/09/03, Robert Patterson wrote: >When this topic came around previously, someone explained the difference >between offset paper lb ratings (which tend to go 20-40-60-80) and linen >paper lb ratings (which tend to go 24-28). If anyone still has it, I'd >like to see it again. Generally

Re: [Finale] paper (was Selling music on line)

2003-02-09 Thread David H. Bailey
Well, even Paper isn't a permanent archival medium -- one great fire and all the archives will be wiped out! Wasn't it some ancient library that was completely destroyed back in Alexander the Great's time, which essentially wiped out the entire history and knowledge of a region back to the daw

Re: [Finale] paper (was Selling music on line)

2003-02-09 Thread David H. Bailey
And you can always put the pdf reader on each CD as you archive your files so that as long as there is a computer that can run the code you will have access to your files, even if Adobe has gone the way of the dodo bird. Robert Patterson wrote: Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote: I'm now in the ha

Re: [Finale] paper (was Selling music on line)

2003-02-09 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
At 10:36 AM 2/9/03 -0600, Robert Patterson wrote: >I'm gradually relinquishing the notion that a hard-copy is necessary for >long-term archive. PDF is robust and portable and is ubiquitous enough >that it will be supported in some form as long as there are computers. Yow. My friend Greg Sanford

Re: [Finale] paper (was Selling music on line)

2003-02-09 Thread Robert Patterson
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote: I'm now in the habit of cooking pages that need to be kept long-term I'm gradually relinquishing the notion that a hard-copy is necessary for long-term archive. PDF is robust and portable and is ubiquitous enough that it will be supported in some form as long as th

Re: [Finale] paper (was Selling music on line)

2003-02-09 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
At 08:08 AM 2/9/03 -0800, Ken Durling wrote: >I just got an HP5100, which I'm quite enamored with. Amazing machine. >I have no idea if it's considered "archive-grade" though. Do you know >if it is? I have no idea. About 10 years ago, I finally sadly an archive-capable photocopier (parts and tone

Re: [Finale] paper (was Selling music on line)

2003-02-09 Thread Ken Durling
On Sun, 09 Feb 2003 11:00:38 -0500, you wrote: >Do any of you use archive-grade laser printers? If you use heavier paper, >the fuser can't get the adhesive quite as hot where it meets the paper >surface. Photocopies are already subject to shedding (and inkjet to smearing). > I just got an HP5100

Re: [Finale] paper (was Selling music on line)

2003-02-09 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
At 09:43 AM 2/9/03 -0600, Robert Patterson wrote: >I see this discussion has turned into a discussion of paper type. I, >too, am always looking for better paper. As an archivist for many arts projects (not just music), I'm wondering about paper vs. reproduction stability. Do any of you use arch

Re: [Finale] paper (was Selling music on line)

2003-02-09 Thread Robert Patterson
I see this discussion has turned into a discussion of paper type. I, too, am always looking for better paper. The closest I've found to what the big publishing houses use is Hammermill Accent Opaque, 70 lb offset, Natural White (which is actually a light ivory color). This paper is acid-free an