Thanks as ever. I'll spend a couple of hours experimenting with a defunct
score- fingers crossed!
Cheers K
- Original Message -
From: dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Score reduction.
Keith Helgesen wrote:
TM metric settings work only for extending
brackets to full metric value, though what I want is metric position of
tuplet *number*.
TM centers a number horizontaly acording to a graphic center of tuplet
bracket, not to its metric center.
Please refer to Read p.212, Ross p.161 should you need
On 5 Jun 2004 at 0:11, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
At 7:50 PM -0400 6/04/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 4 Jun 2004 at 18:55, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
I suppose this amounts to a different philosophy about what I want
my notation program to do.
You seem to assume a number of things:
On 4 Jun 2004 at 22:17, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jun 4, 2004, at 9:29 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Lyric tool works well.
Really? Lyric tool works well if you know what you're doing, or if
you never do anything complicated, but it has lots of pit-traps that
the unwray can fall into. And
At 2:49 PM -0400 6/05/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 5 Jun 2004 at 0:17, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
Well, I have a couple of macros to accomplish it. Mostly I want to
keep control. I re-extract when I see the need, and use the routine I
outlined when it would create less work.
But why do you
Thank you! That is what I have been hinting at.
David W. Fenton wrote:
The key distinction between data stored in a spreadsheet and data
stored in a relational database is that the latter separates data
storage from data presentation, whereas in a spreadsheet, the place
where you store the data
At 1:04 PM -0700 6/05/04, Chuck Israels wrote:
(Dave is still working with pencils - sometimes faster than we can,
and will probably not make the jump to this particular laborious
relationship with screens and mice. I find it almost impossible to
imagine going back.)
Cheers,
Chuck
Oh, pencil
For example, I HATE the way Microsoft Word
makes assumptions about what I want done with my typing, like
correcting my spelling without telling me, or putting bullets or
numbers when I hit carriage return.
You know you can turn all of that off, right?
Aaron.
Hey, Aaron, I
On 05 Jun 2004, at 03:22 PM, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
Chromatic Transposition (for transposing instruments without key
signatures) was an excellent and badly-needed innovation, but it
didn't treat accidentals properly for a couple of versions,
A couple of versions? It's STILL not fixed!
I realized that we are into June now - the usual time of year that
speculation begins about the release and anticipated new features of the
next version of Finale. Unlike other years, however, a maintenance updater
to fix the most glaring bugs and steps-backward of the last version is
nowhere to
On Jun 5, 2004, at 12:22 PM, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
Auto word extensions slow down the Mac version of 2004 something
awful. Taking lyrics into account for music spacing (this has been
part of Finale for a long time, I admit) sometimes gives really odd
results, like if you have a long
At 5:27 PM -0700 6/05/04, Brian Williams wrote:
FWIW, here are the drawbacks and benefits of my Special Part Extraction
method over Express Music's Extract Parts/copy-and-paste method:
(snip)
One more note: Christopher BJ Smith mentioned the fact that when you change
a part in SPE it doesn't
At 7:21 PM -0700 6/05/04, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jun 5, 2004, at 12:22 PM, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
And how do you shift syllables for the second verse without
messing up the first verse? It's true that it is better than it
was, but one still has to be careful, or major screw-ups can occur.
Hi Chris,
I don't think you're getting what Brian is talking about here. I
haven't actually tried his method yet -- frankly, it never occurred to
me -- but boy does it ever look like a time-saver!
Anyhow, what he is doing is making one copy of the score for printing
purposes, and then one
14 matches
Mail list logo
