Well, yes, but considering it's $300+ US for a network card, it's a
relatively simple matter to adjust your energy saver settings so that
the computer hooked up to the printer never sleeps. (Or, for the
energy-conscious, to go up and wake the computer hooked up to the
printer prior to printing
Hi Joe,
Thank you for your post...simply putyou are an inspiration. Your
dedication to and love for your music is really something to admire.
Not to mention the brave way that you have taken your difficult
circumstances and continued on and found a way anyway! I'm glad you
are a member of
On Jan 7, 2005, at 9:12 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
True, for that price you don't get the network card, but Mac OS X
10.3's USB printer sharing is so good, you probably don't need a
network card.
- Darcy
Except that for printer sharing, the computer with the printer
connected has to be turn
Oops! I was writing out of recall- I should've checked my notes...
It was the Ricoh 2018D I was thinking of (Aficio line?)
Cecil Rigby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal)
www.harrockhall.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Darcy James Argue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday
I bought a used HP 5siMX for a hundred quid with a quarter million copies
logged. It's an A3 laser, w/duplexer, postscript, network built in. These
things can do a couple of million copies so my 10,000/year shouldn't stress it!
I maxed out the memory to 72mb for $30 + $5 shipping to the UK. Whe
> Hi Richard,
> *How* did you figure it out? This still stymies me.
This was the second time that I figured out what I was doing wrong. The
first time was a year ago but it did not stick!
I was trying to open the MIDI file in SONAR3 but when I used 'Import MIDI'
only the notes arrived. I realize
Hi Richard,
*How* did you figure it out? This still stymies me.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 06 Jan 2005, at 02:22 PM, Richard Yates wrote:
Never mind! Figured it out.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Yates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 11
On 07 Jan 2005, at 06:40 PM, Cecil Rigby wrote:
I looked at a refurbished Ricoh
600 with all the functions the new 5100dtn has and it was almost two
thousand dollars more.
WHAT???
That *can't* be right. Either it wasn't a Ricoh AP600N, or someone was
trying to scam you.
The Ricoh AP600
I just went through the fun job of getting a new printer myself-- the
HP5100dtn. I am *very* pleased with its quality. I am finding it slow,
however, for my needs. I produce many booklets more than 50 pages long and
it doesn't like to mopy them. I'll be upgrading the memory next week, which
should
Hi Don,
I have a Ricoh AP2610 (with duplexer), the predecessor to the AP600N.
I got a great deal on it and have no regrets -- at the time, I could
not have afforded an HP 11x17 printer under any circumstances, and my
Ricoh has generally gotten the job done. However, it has been somewhat
buggy
Wow! And then we dare complain because a certain action might take 4 clicks
instead of two!
Thanks Joe- and good luck- you can use it.
Cheers Keith in OZ
Keith Helgesen.
Director of Music, Canberra City Band.
Ph: (02) 62910787. Band Mob. 0436-620587
Private Mob 0417-042171
-Original Message
Dear list,
I have been a long time lurker and have never contributed but this
wonderful thread has prompted me to include my bio. It's been refreshing
to read everyone talking about themselves without a lot of bravado. This
list is a wealth of useful information and intelligent musical
conversa
on 5/28/04 10:43 AM, Bob Florence at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all:
Has anyone done a comparison between the above printers?
Any help would be appreciated.
Bob Florence
Hi everyone,
Bob asked about this back in May when I wasn't in a position to be really
interested. My Apple LaserWriter Pr
on 5/28/04 10:43 AM, Bob Florence at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> Has anyone done a comparison between the above printers?
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Bob Florence
Hi everyone,
Bob asked about this back in May when I wasn't in a position to be really
interested. My Apple
Maybe it is the same fontset, but when I open a postscript font file from
FinWin2004 in Fontlab the Unicode encoding is different from a FinWin 2005
font file.
It is most important that, unless you have Adobe Type Manager installed, the
fonts should NOT go to the PSFONT folder but to the Windows fo
What you are asking for--in theory--ought to be fairly simple. It's not that a
plugin could re-use Finale's word-extension code. But the new word extensions
(Fin04) are implemented as special "smart shapes". A plugin should be able
fairly easily to find every word-extension smart shape and add a
Thanks to Aaron for his succinct plug of Mass Copy. Along with TGTools
Align/Move, Mass Copy is the plugin I use most often.
Aaron correctly noted one advantage of Mass Copy over Finale's built-in Mass
Edit function--the ability to copy from one source staff to an entire block of
target staves
Richard Yates a écrit :
I just did this with a file that has many articulations and expressions.
All
appear on first perusal to be perfect. Trying this from 2004 to 2003 was
problematic as layers were shifted up one number and so layer four was
lost.
2005 to 2004 does not seem to have that problem.
The soundfont is one that I made myself using my Milburn guitar. The
complete soundfont is about 24MB. I do not distribute the whole font, but
the 'normal' sound (minus harmonics, tasto, ponticello, etc.) is available
at:
http://www.yatesguitar.com/misc/Milburn-normal.SF2 (4.7MB)
Richard Yates
>
All,
We have *not* released new fonts for Finale 2005. The fonts are the same as
2004. The creation date of some files reverts to the date installed (don't
ask me why, because I don't know).
Dennis--
I was just wondering if you were trying to copy the PS fonts directly to the
fonts folder, post-
> > I just did this with a file that has many articulations and expressions.
All
> > appear on first perusal to be perfect. Trying this from 2004 to 2003 was
> > problematic as layers were shifted up one number and so layer four was
lost.
> > 2005 to 2004 does not seem to have that problem.
>
> Usi
Dennis,
How are you installing the fonts? Simply running the install?
On 1/7/05 1:18 AM, "d. collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> saith:
> Allen Fisher asked:
>
>> Do you have both the Screen font and bitmap fonts installed?
>
> I'm sorry, but I don't follow you here. I didn't know there were separat
I see I made a mistake, where I said bitmap, I meant Printer.
On 1/7/05 3:33 AM, "Mike Cholewa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> saith:
> The date of the new postscript fonts (Windows/Finwin2005) is 15-04-2004.
>
>> Allen Fisher asked:
>>> Do you have both the Screen font and bitmap fonts installed?
> This
What a lovely, lovely arrangement. Thanks for sharing it Richard.
RegardsJerry
>For those interested in soundfonts, classical guitar, and/or Finale playback
>possibilities, I have posted a file at:
>
>http://www.yatesguitar.com/misc/QuietSong.mp3 (4.5MB)
>
>It is a new work by the Italia
The date of the new postscript fonts (Windows/Finwin2005) is 15-04-2004.
>Allen Fisher asked:
>>Do you have both the Screen font and bitmap fonts installed?
This is for mac.
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of d. collins
> Sent: Fr
Richard Yates wrote:
I just did this with a file that has many articulations and expressions. All
appear on first perusal to be perfect. Trying this from 2004 to 2003 was
problematic as layers were shifted up one number and so layer four was lost.
2005 to 2004 does not seem to have that problem.
Us
26 matches
Mail list logo
