I just leave the minimum measure width at zero: works fine. I think
it's set that way anyway in recent versions of the default file. You
never actually get zero-width measures, because Finale always makes
space for the rests.
Michael Cook
On 26 Jul 2005, at 22:45, David W. Fenton wrote:
Afte
David W. Fenton / 2005/07/26 / 02:18 PM wrote:
>I see this a lot here on the list. Is there any explanation anywhere
>of why this is the case? Is it caused by improperly designed
>applications, or some problem in the way the OS handles file access
>requests from applications?
>
>It just defies
MakeMusic just emailed to tell me that my Finale 2006 upgrade will arrive
Friday.
Standing by...
Jim Mays
Maine
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Brad Beyenhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Well, even though it isn't an executable program (which is the
>definition that, of course, first springs to mind when the word
>"program" is used), a font is still "programmed" in terms of
>determining the font characters' relationships to the baseline,
On 26 Jul 2005 at 17:25, dhbailey wrote:
> Ken Durling wrote:
> > At 01:45 PM 7/26/2005, you wrote:
> >
> >> > Well, the default minimum measure width is 1 inch, which is
> >> > definitely too wide for the pickup measures. I always set it to
> >> > .5 inches, so that when you respace your music,
OK, got it, thanks. it's in Options>Document Settings>Music Spacing
Options. Lots of other interesting settings to explore here, too.
Ken
At 02:12 PM 7/26/2005, you wrote:
On 26 Jul 2005 at 13:57, Ken Durling wrote:
> At 01:45 PM 7/26/2005, you wrote:
>
> > > Well, the default minimum m
Ken Durling wrote:
At 01:45 PM 7/26/2005, you wrote:
> Well, the default minimum measure width is 1 inch, which is
> definitely too wide for the pickup measures. I always set it to .5
> inches, so that when you respace your music, it should get suitably
> narrower.
Where is this setting? I
On 26 Jul 2005 at 13:57, Ken Durling wrote:
> At 01:45 PM 7/26/2005, you wrote:
>
> > > Well, the default minimum measure width is 1 inch, which is
> > > definitely too wide for the pickup measures. I always set it to .5
> > > inches, so that when you respace your music, it should get
> > > suit
At 01:45 PM 7/26/2005, you wrote:
> Well, the default minimum measure width is 1 inch, which is
> definitely too wide for the pickup measures. I always set it to .5
> inches, so that when you respace your music, it should get suitably
> narrower.
Where is this setting? I'm not finding it in
On 26 Jul 2005 at 16:29, David W. Fenton wrote:
> On 26 Jul 2005 at 13:24, Ken Durling wrote:
>
> > OK, got it, thanks. Then drag the measure handles to resize. Or
> > is there an automation for that?
>
> Well, the default minimum measure width is 1 inch, which is
> definitely too wide for
Ah, ok. Thanks much.
Ken
At 01:29 PM 7/26/2005, you wrote:
On 26 Jul 2005 at 13:24, Ken Durling wrote:
> OK, got it, thanks. Then drag the measure handles to resize. Or is
> there an automation for that?
Well, the default minimum measure width is 1 inch, which is
definitely too wide for
David Fenton:
> And the problem to me seems to not be replacing COPY EVERYTHING with
> RESET TO DEFAULTS (if you use the keyboard shortcut to pop the dialog
> before copying, then you won't have any extra steps), but the
> apparent loss of state.
You lose state, *and* you are required to acces
On 26 Jul 2005 at 13:24, Ken Durling wrote:
> OK, got it, thanks. Then drag the measure handles to resize. Or is
> there an automation for that?
Well, the default minimum measure width is 1 inch, which is
definitely too wide for the pickup measures. I always set it to .5
inches, so that whe
OK, got it, thanks. Then drag the measure handles to resize. Or is there
an automation for that?
Ken
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
In Finale 2006 there's a "Mid Measure Repeat" plug-in which does the
job automatically.
Michael Cook
On 26 Jul 2005, at 21:53, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 26 Jul 2005 at 12:38, Ken Durling wrote:
Another newbie question: How do you create partial measures with
repeats, like on repeats to a
On 26 Jul 2005 at 12:38, Ken Durling wrote:
> Another newbie question: How do you create partial measures with
> repeats, like on repeats to a pick up such as are typical in Menuet &
> Trios? I'm not finding it in the tutorial or user's manual. In some
> cases I would simply want to place an e
At 03:38 PM 07/26/2005, Ken Durling wrote:
>Another newbie question: How do you create partial measures with repeats,
>like on repeats to a pick up such as are typical in Menuet & Trios?
In Finale, you actually create *two* bars to accomplish this. The
first bar has beats one and two of the mea
Sorry, I should add that I'm still using Fin2K2.
Ken
At 12:38 PM 7/26/2005, you wrote:
Hi all -
Another newbie question: How do you create partial measures with repeats,
like on repeats to a pick up such as are typical in Menuet & Trios? I'm
not finding it in the tutorial or user's manua
Title: RE: [Finale] Copy Everything (was Jari's review of Fin 2006)
Hello again Robert,
I think I do fully understand how "backwards" this decision is but I was trying to make a point about the basic logical aspects of this decision and not some of the more in-depth issues because frankly
Hi all -
Another newbie question: How do you create partial measures with repeats,
like on repeats to a pick up such as are typical in Menuet & Trios? I'm
not finding it in the tutorial or user's manual. In some cases I would
simply want to place an end repeat between say the 2nd and 3rd be
Yes, when you hit "Reset to Default", you loose the saved state. I
can't see any way to toggle, as you can in Finale 2005, between a
certain set of items to copy and the "copy everything" state.
On 26 Jul 2005, at 20:20, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 26 Jul 2005 at 18:10, Michael Cook wrote:
O
On 26 Jul 2005 at 13:21, Fiskum, Steve wrote:
> I think it would be great if that is what "Reset to Defaults" means. I
> thought it meant that you could setup a default copy action somewhere
> and that you could click the "Reset To Defaults" button that to get
> back to that desired way of copying
> > And you should be repairing permissions regularly in OS X, especially
> > when you have permissions problems (like with the OS 9 files).
>
> I see this a lot here on the list. Is there any explanation anywhere
> of why this is the case? Is it caused by improperly designed
> applications, or
On 26 Jul 2005 at 18:10, Michael Cook wrote:
> On 26 Jul 2005, at 16:32, Fiskum, Steve wrote:
> > What's even more frustrating is that they take the basic
> > functionality away from just selecting "Copy Everything" and do not
> > include something remotely similar in this new and improved dialog
On 26 Jul 2005 at 11:25, Darcy James Argue wrote:
> And you should be repairing permissions regularly in OS X, especially
> when you have permissions problems (like with the OS 9 files).
I see this a lot here on the list. Is there any explanation anywhere
of why this is the case? Is it caused by
Title: RE: [Finale] Copy Everything (was Jari's review of Fin 2006)
Hello Michael,
I think it would be great if that is what "Reset to Defaults" means. I thought it meant that you could setup a default copy action somewhere and that you could click the "Reset To Defaults" button that to get
Does anyone on here know any good rehearsal venues in or near Nottingham,
UK? I need space for a choir of 200, a piano, disabled access preferably,
and parking. In other areas we have used churches and schools, but as we are
based in Leeds, we don't know the Nottingham area very well.
Many thanks
> > You should not be manually changing permissions in OS X.
>
> If I did not do so, I would be totally unable to edit any file or
> folder ported from System 9, all of which come into OSX with
> permissions that lock me out. It has been a royal pain in the ass
> changing all those permissions
Steve Fiskum:
>I just do not see the benefit of removing it. Is it because it
> seems redundant?
You would have to address that question to MM. (I hope you will, and if they
provide an answer please share it.) They removed it consciously, purposefully,
and stubbornly, but what their reasoning
On 26 Jul 2005, at 16:32, Fiskum, Steve wrote:
What's even more frustrating is that they take the basic functionality
away from just selecting "Copy Everything" and do not include
something remotely similar in this new and improved dialog box! What
gives! They obviously thought that users would
Darcy wrote:
>[Also, I hate to ask "why would you want to do that,"
but I'm not sure >why anyone would want chords to play
back in Finale. Chord >playback in Finale is
incredibly clunky because Finale makes no >attempt to
account for voice-leading. If you want "chord"
playback, >you should creat
On 26 Jul 2005, at 11:13 AM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
On Jul 26, 2005, at 10:44 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
You should not be manually changing permissions in OS X.
If I did not do so, I would be totally unable to edit any file or
folder ported from System 9, all of which come into OSX with
On Jul 26, 2005, at 10:44 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
You should not be manually changing permissions in OS X.
If I did not do so, I would be totally unable to edit any file or
folder ported from System 9, all of which come into OSX with
permissions that lock me out. It has been a royal p
On 26 Jul 2005, at 10:35 AM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
I downloaded Flash Player 7, necessary to view some web content, but
when I go to install it, I keep getting told I don't have the
necessary permissions.
I tried changing the permissions on everything I could think of,
That's a bad idea. Y
I downloaded Flash Player 7, necessary to view some web content, but
when I go to install it, I keep getting told I don't have the necessary
permissions.
I tried changing the permissions on everything I could think of, but no
luck. Any advice?
Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.
Title: RE: [Finale] Copy Everything (was Jari's review of Fin 2006)
Hello Robert,
I am with you on this one. I think it is a bad idea to remove "Copy Everything." Since before Jari's review I have been very conscious on how much I use this feature and it is so ingrained in my workflow it is
have you tried to e-mail yourself the fonts archives, downloading them
using the second computer and then dragging the font file to its
corresponding place in the finale folders of the second computer?
godofredo
Allen Fisher wrote:
The finale 2003 installer installs fonts that are incompati
A-NO-NE Music wrote:
David W. Fenton / 2005/07/25 / 09:12 PM wrote:
It shows, I guess, that people intereted in gamba (and there are
thousands in the world) are not cross-interested in synthesized music
sounds. Perhaps it's because no one is writing new music for gamba
(except me, of course
Tyler Turner wrote:
[snip]>
Regarding using different sound sources
simultaneously, this can not be done currently between
VST devices and MIDI Setup Output devices. You have to
go with one or the other. You can choose any
combination of VST devices - meaning you could mix
Finale GPO with the f
A-NO-NE Music wrote:
dhbailey / 2005/07/25 / 06:45 PM wrote:
Read the finale web-site -- there's a list of NI sample sets which are
compatible with Finale2006's integrated VST (Native Instruments only,
apparently) sample player.
I think you are misunderstanding. You must pay extra to use
40 matches
Mail list logo
