Re: [Finale] Chorus question

2006-02-28 Thread Martin Banner
Tutti (senza solo)? On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:52 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote: Really? So how do you differentiate passages that are to be sung by _all_ (including the soloist)? In orchestral work, gli altri or the rest = everyone but the soloist, which is not the same as tutti. My client

Re: [Finale] Appealing to the collective wisdom of the list

2006-02-28 Thread Noel Stoutenburg
Aaron, I specified earlier, WINfin 2k earlier, but not when I wrote Sherber: That's what I thought. Problem is, I can't remember how to hide the layer so that it plays back. While I appreciate your suggestion, Options | Document Options | Layers. For your designated playback layer, check

Re: [Finale] Chorus question

2006-02-28 Thread Mark D Lew
On Feb 27, 2006, at 6:19 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote: How about just Solo and Chorus? Typically, the soloist sees herself as (1) separate from the chorus, or (2) a member of the chorus who happens to have some solo lines. Which is the case will depend on the nature of the solo, and more

Re: [Finale] Chorus question

2006-02-28 Thread Mark D Lew
On Feb 28, 2006, at 12:46 AM, Martin Banner wrote: Tutti (senza solo)? Unless your piece is in Italian, or your chorus is accustomed to singing Italian (eg, an opera chorus), I would advise against using Italian words for which a simple English equivalent exists. Experienced choristers

Re: [Finale] Chorus question

2006-02-28 Thread dhbailey
Darcy James Argue wrote: Really? So how do you differentiate passages that are to be sung by _all_ (including the soloist)? In orchestral work, gli altri or the rest = everyone but the soloist, which is not the same as tutti. My client doesn't seem to think the rest is clear enough, but

Re: [Finale] Appealing to the collective wisdom of the list

2006-02-28 Thread dhbailey
Noel Stoutenburg wrote: Aaron, I specified earlier, WINfin 2k earlier, but not when I wrote Sherber: That's what I thought. Problem is, I can't remember how to hide the layer so that it plays back. While I appreciate your suggestion, Options | Document Options | Layers. For your

Re: [Finale] Appealing to the collective wisdom of the list

2006-02-28 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 05:06 AM 2/28/2006, Noel Stoutenburg wrote: Aaron, I specified earlier, WINfin 2k earlier,  Sorry, Noel, I overlooked that. Aaron. ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Re: [Finale] Chorus question

2006-02-28 Thread Noel Stoutenburg
Darcy James Argue wrote: A question: What is the standard indication, in works for SATB chorus, that a passage is to be sung by everyone except the soloist (when, e.g., the soprano soloist shares a staff with the rest of the sopranos)? Here's what Oxford University Press did in setting

RE: [Finale] Chorus question

2006-02-28 Thread G GRIFFITHS
Ah, but, in a Cathedral setting the soloist (who would be one of the choir) would sing with the choir when it says tutti. Gary Griffiths -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noel Stoutenburg Sent: 28 February 2006 13:41 To: finale@shsu.edu

RE: [Finale] MacFin OSX versions

2006-02-28 Thread Fisher, Allen
10.1 was never supported, for the reasons Darcy mentioned among others so I believe that it was blocked. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Patterson Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 4:04 PM To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: [Finale] MacFin

Re: [Finale] Chorus question

2006-02-28 Thread Christopher Smith
On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:28 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote: A question: What is the standard indication, in works for SATB chorus, that a passage is to be sung by everyone except the soloist (when, e.g., the soprano soloist shares a staff with the rest of the sopranos)? Assuming the soloist

Re: [Finale] preset arrowhead

2006-02-28 Thread Chuck Israels
Brennon, You can find Bill's things here: http://www.gwmp.com/ Chuck On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:04 PM, Brennon Bortz wrote: Thanks, Chuck. Is there a website with more information? Thanks, Brennon On 2/27/06 8:00 PM, Chuck Israels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I seem to be singing the same old

Re: [Finale] Chorus question

2006-02-28 Thread Darcy James Argue
Thanks Mark. Solo, Chorus, and Solo+Chorus seems like the most clear and efficient solution. - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://secretsociety.typepad.com Brooklyn, NY On 28 Feb 2006, at 5:02 AM, Mark D Lew wrote: On Feb 27, 2006, at 6:19 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote: How about just

Re: [Finale] Appealing to the collective wisdom of the list

2006-02-28 Thread David W. Fenton
On 28 Feb 2006 at 4:06, Noel Stoutenburg wrote: While I appreciate your suggestion, Options | Document Options | Layers. For your designated playback layer, check 'Hide layer when inactive' and 'Playback', and uncheck 'Affects music spacing.' this does not work in 2k, the version my

Re: [Finale] Chorus question

2006-02-28 Thread David W. Fenton
On 28 Feb 2006 at 2:31, Darcy James Argue wrote: I have absolutely no idea what any of this has to do with academia. Nothing. It's precisely the kind of rant that if I had posted it, dozens of people would be posting to the list about how awful it is that people like me post rude things

Re: [Finale] Chorus question

2006-02-28 Thread David W. Fenton
On 28 Feb 2006 at 2:02, Mark D Lew wrote: In your case, I think what you want to do is assume that it's case #1. Label solo lines as solo, chorus only lines as chorus, and lines where you want both as solo + chorus. This is consistent with how opera, operetta and musical theater vocal

Re: [Finale] Chorus question

2006-02-28 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
At 03:43 PM 2/28/06 -0500, David W. Fenton wrote: It's precisely the kind of rant that if I had posted it, dozens of people would be posting to the list about how awful it is that people like me post rude things here. Snort. Glad I finished my coffee. :) Dennis -- Please participate

Re: [Finale] Chorus question

2006-02-28 Thread Noel Stoutenburg
G GRIFFITHS wrote: Ah, but, in a Cathedral setting the soloist (who would be one of the choir) would sing with the choir when it says tutti. I concede this is often, perhaps even usually, the case, but not always. In any case, Darcy's question was about terminology; Walton and OUP used

Re: [Finale] Chorus question

2006-02-28 Thread Christopher Smith
On Feb 28, 2006, at 6:41 PM, Noel Stoutenburg wrote: G GRIFFITHS wrote: Ah, but, in a Cathedral setting the soloist (who would be one of the choir) would sing with the choir when it says tutti. I concede this is often, perhaps even usually, the case, but not always. In any case, Darcy's

Re: [Finale] Chorus question

2006-02-28 Thread Raymond Horton
Darcy had mentioned that the soloist was singing at the same time as the rest of the soprano section - that was what made it awkward to label. I suppose it might be even more awkward if the sopranos and the soloist might or might not sing at the same time. All the more reason to have a

Re: [Finale] Chorus question

2006-02-28 Thread Noel Stoutenburg
Christopher Smith wrote: Darcy had mentioned that the soloist was singing at the same time as the rest of the soprano section - that was what made it awkward to label. I suppose it might be even more awkward if the sopranos and the soloist might or might not sing at the same time. All the

Re: [Finale] Chorus question

2006-02-28 Thread themark
sorry for leaving the path for a while, what is the difference between choir and chorus? thanks ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale