Randolph Peters wrote:
It is too bad that for playback of both modifications (making the
velocity higher and the duration shorter), you still need to put in
separate articulations, rather than the combined one.
Wrong.
I know, the UI sucks but articulations actually supports multiple
playback
Did you have a nice thanksgiving dinner?
Still stuffing yourself with leftovers?
Let's dance!
http://www.anonemusic.com/node/827
A clip from last night show.
Y'know, we can play Christmas selections on all the shows during the
season, but Thanksgiving music can be played only if the show is
well he's what i found in the manual:
Human Playback interprets and performs articulations during playback
automatically. See Human
Playbackfile:///H:/Program%20Files/Finale%202008/Help%20Files/Content/Finale/Human_Playback.htm.
To hear manual changes to the MIDI playback definition of any
On Nov 25, 2007, at 5:38 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Randolph Peters wrote:
It is too bad that for playback of both modifications (making the
velocity higher and the duration shorter), you still need to put
in separate articulations, rather than the combined one.
Wrong.
I know, the UI
I learned (once again) that with Finale you often have to make a
little experiment to test what you think you know about the program.
Articulation playback, with or without Human Playback, is one of
those things.
Jari opened my eyes to the fact that all three playback options for
Christopher Smith wrote:
Could you give me a clue? As far as I can see, you can affect attack,
key velocity, or duration, and you can affect top and bottom notes
separately as far as the amount goes, but you can't have more than one
option active at a time.
What would I have to do to say,
Adam Golding wrote:
well he's what i found in the manual:
Human Playback interprets and performs articulations during playback
automatically. See Human
Playbackfile:///H:/Program%20Files/Finale%202008/Help%20Files/Content/Finale/Human_Playback.htm.
To hear manual changes to the MIDI playback
On Nov 25, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Christopher Smith wrote:
Could you give me a clue? As far as I can see, you can affect
attack, key velocity, or duration, and you can affect top and
bottom notes separately as far as the amount goes, but you can't
have more than one
perhaps there should be a user-maintained FAQ for this sort of thing--is
there? i never did find one..
On 25/11/2007, Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 25, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Christopher Smith wrote:
Could you give me a clue? As far as I can see,
On 25/11/2007, Jari Williamsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Golding wrote:
well he's what i found in the manual:
Human Playback interprets and performs articulations during playback
automatically. See Human
Adam Golding wrote:
does anyone know of
a way to affect the duration of umarked notes? in some performance styles
they should be detached or 'at the performer's discretion' most likley
1. MIDI Tool
2. Check Edit Note Durations in the MIDI Tool menu
3. Select the region of your music where you
dc wrote:
Is it possible to copy the optimization from one score to another?
Or is there any way I can move easily staves in an optimized piece
without messing everything up? I need to do two versions of the same
piece but changing (among other things) the order of the staves, so I'm
oh, yes, i was thinking of affecting the 'default' length--i think sibelius
has this option now, and it used to default to a non-legato playback, which
was a bit of a pain (articulation on every note, anybody?) but your
technique will work in a pinch, especially with the filter function
On
And by the way, the MIDI tool does not have to be invoked/applied solely
through the MIDI tool split window. It can be invoked as a mass edit.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jari Williamsson
Sent: Sun 25-Nov-07 14:29
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: Human
On 25 Nov 2007 at 13:45, Adam Golding wrote:
perhaps there should be a user-maintained FAQ for this sort of thing--is
there? i never did find one..
A Wiki would be great. I'd be happy to host it on my website, as I
already run another Wiki.
--
David W. Fenton
MacFin 2008
I have 4 bars in E maj which transposes to 6 sharps for the trumpets.
I think they would prefer 6 flats.
How could I accomplish this?
Stan Lord
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Christopher Smith wrote:
On Nov 25, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Christopher Smith wrote:
Could you give me a clue? As far as I can see, you can affect attack,
key velocity, or duration, and you can affect top and bottom notes
separately as far as the amount goes, but you
At 10:28 PM + 11/25/07, Stan Lord wrote:
I have 4 bars in E maj which transposes to 6 sharps for the trumpets.
I think they would prefer 6 flats.
Wouldn't that be eight flats?
Would it be clearer to use accidentals instead of a key change?
--
Carlberg Jones
Skype - carlbergbmug
Cornista
I wrote:
To change music from F# major to Gb major, choose transpose and
select diminished second as the interval.
That's if you're editing the part.
If you want to leave the main score alone and have the part come out
right, I assume you want to change the transposition definition.
On Nov 25, 2007, at 6:09 PM, Carlberg Jones wrote:
At 10:28 PM + 11/25/07, Stan Lord wrote:
I have 4 bars in E maj which transposes to 6 sharps for the trumpets.
I think they would prefer 6 flats.
Wouldn't that be eight flats?
Would it be clearer to use accidentals instead of a key
On Nov 25, 2007, at 2:28 PM, Stan Lord wrote:
I have 4 bars in E maj which transposes to 6 sharps for the trumpets.
I think they would prefer 6 flats.
How could I accomplish this?
To change music from F# major to Gb major, choose transpose and
select diminished second as the interval.
mdl
On Nov 25, 2007, at 6:30 PM, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Nov 25, 2007, at 2:28 PM, Stan Lord wrote:
I have 4 bars in E maj which transposes to 6 sharps for the trumpets.
I think they would prefer 6 flats.
How could I accomplish this?
To change music from F# major to Gb major, choose transpose and
On Nov 25, 2007, at 1:08 PM, dc wrote:
I know it's standard practice to repeat the accidental on a tied
note after a page break or a system break.
I have rarely seen this, and it makes no sense to me. A tie is a tie
- no pitch change, so what's the point in an accidental (unless one
is
Hi Chuck,
Notwithstanding what Read says, this practice is mainly used (and is
mainly useful) in score situations, so the conductor does not have to
flip back a page to determine what the pitch actually is. I would not
do this on a part, but on a score, over a page break, it makes sense.
24 matches
Mail list logo
