Friends:
Joke of the day:
"Q: Why can one not notate a third or a tritone in Sibelius 5? A:
Because [According to the home page at , lower right
hand corner], it's "the perfect notation software".
But that's not the main reason for my post. Allen Fisher wrote, in part:
It is a tremendous am
LOL. You forgot include
--AF
On Jan 9, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Javier Ruiz wrote:
Change char for wchar_t in the source code and recompile.
Just kidding. It has to be a nightmare.
Javier R.
The 9/1/09 13:44, Phil Daley escribió/wrote:
A few years ago, I helped with the project of making AutoCA
It is a tremendous amount of work, most of which cannot be staged.
Please, please let support know you want Unicode support!
--AF
On Jan 9, 2009, at 7:44 AM, Phil Daley wrote:
At 1/9/2009 08:14 AM, dc wrote:
>Allen Fisher écrit:
>>Finale is not unicode compliant.
>
>Which of course raises
Please bug support. I'm guessing I'll get eyerolls for saying it, but
that's the way it'll get done.
--AF
On Jan 9, 2009, at 7:14 AM, dc wrote:
Allen Fisher écrit:
Finale is not unicode compliant.
Which of course raises the question of when, if ever, it will be?
Dennis
__
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:57 PM, John Howell wrote:
> If, indeed, a company that does not actually own either the manuscripts
> themselves or a copyright in those manuscripts created microfiches from
> them, it triggers still other questions: Do those copies constitute a
> modern publication? (
At 8:44 AM -0500 1/9/09, Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
Good Day:
I am curious about the copyright situation with the Berlin
Sing-Akademie reproductions. I know of a friend in Europe who has
asked permission to publish editions of 3 items in the collection but
only given permission for one. The situati
Hi all,
Just wanted to comment about a place that sells toner and chips for any
printer in the world. I ordered two toner refills and two chips with s/h for
less of the price of a new cartridge. It's PrinterInkWarehouse.com
My printer is a cheap Lexmark 120n and it seems that more expensive Lexma
Change char for wchar_t in the source code and recompile.
Just kidding. It has to be a nightmare.
Javier R.
The 9/1/09 13:44, Phil Daley escribió/wrote:
> A few years ago, I helped with the project of making AutoCAD Unicode
> compliant.
>
> It was a tremendous amount of work, more than I would
On 9 Jan 2009 at 21:43, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
> On 09.01.2009 Daniel Wolf wrote:
> > In the case of public domain works by well-known composers, if the works
> > are of any artistic merit, it is very hard to argue for any delay or
> > restriction in publication of source materials, and an argu
On 09.01.2009 Daniel Wolf wrote:
In the case of public domain works by well-known composers, if the works are of
any artistic merit, it is very hard to argue for any delay or restriction in
publication of source materials, and an argument against more open access to
the raw data should be equa
Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
I have heard on the rumor mill, that a certain Bach scholar is pretty
much in charge to the Bach library that was discovered in the Ukraine,
and is VERY restrictive about who sees what. Which if true, I find
rather sad and odd considering the music was unavailable for so
On 9 Jan 2009, at 1:00 PM, Allen Fisher
wrote:
Some windows TTF's (a type called "naked TrueType" don't ask me why)
don't play well with some apps in OSX.
I found this, don't have any idea if they work or not:
www.phon.acl.ac.uk/home/wells/fonts.htm
Please send requests for Unicode suppor
On 09.01.2009 Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
I am curious about the copyright situation with the Berlin
Sing-Akademie reproductions. I know of a friend in Europe who has
asked permission to publish editions of 3 items in the collection but
only given permission for one. The situation in the United State
> 1. In 2000, if I entered, say, a half instead of a
>quarter note, I could simply hit the 5 key on that note and it
>would change. No more. I have to take it out and do it over.
> Can this be rectified?
Are you using Speedy Tool entry? The behavior has always been that, if the
curs
Dear Finale list,
I'm way out of the loop. I was using Finale 2000 until recently,
when I upgraded to 2004. Some changes are driving me nuts, but I
suspect (hope!) there may be easy solutiopns.
1. In 2000, if I entered, say, a half instead of a quarter note, I
could simply hit the 5
At 1/9/2009 08:14 AM, dc wrote:
>Allen Fisher écrit:
>>Finale is not unicode compliant.
>
>Which of course raises the question of when, if ever, it will be?
A few years ago, I helped with the project of making AutoCAD Unicode compliant.
It was a tremendous amount of work, more than I would have
Good Day:
I am curious about the copyright situation with the Berlin
Sing-Akademie reproductions. I know of a friend in Europe who has
asked permission to publish editions of 3 items in the collection but
only given permission for one. The situation in the United States is
obviously different beca
I had problems with fonts in Finale for a while until I found a utility online
for fixing the fonts folder. I run that occasionally and have had no more
problems. Maybe there's a utility for Macs like that?
-Cecil Rigby
Liberty, SC
- Original Message -
From: Richard Yates
To: fin
N/T
Mark Ralston
mac...@bellsouth.net
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Carl Dershem wrote:
James Gilbert wrote:
I'll echo the recommendation on the Ricoh AP610N. For the price, it's
not bad. There are better printers out there. I've had it less than a
year, but it does quite fine. It prints 11x17 and similar metric
sizes. I never tried envelopes until now but it is
I've never had problems with my HP 5100dtn (bought new) except for very rare
paper jams. Toner cartridges are about $115-$145 depending on where you buy
them, but I refill mine twice before getting a new one.
My copy count is over 125K in just 5 years and the machine seems indestructible
so far
21 matches
Mail list logo