In the HELP menu there is an option to UNREGISTER the program giving
back the registration from the Finale server online. Once you receive
conformation of that in email go ahead and reinstall on the new
computer and follow the steps to register as you did before.
__
Hi...
There is an authorize/reauthorize process.
So go ahead and install 2011 on your current computers. When you are ready to
switch systems, just deauthorize Finale on the old system(s) and authorize
Finale on the new system(s). I've done this several times without glitches. I
messed up once
I Hit send too soon.
Your installs are edition-specific, so installs of 2004 won't count against
your total for 2011
Sent from my iPhone, so please pardon all the typos.
On Jul 11, 2010, at 11:25 PM, "David McKay" wrote:
> G'day
> We have just received our copy of Finale 2011 and are about to
You unregister (or whatever they call it - can't remember at the moment) the
computer you are replacing - freeing up another computer. You can do this on
the Make Music web site.
Chuck
On Jul 11, 2010, at 8:25 PM, David McKay wrote:
> G'day
> We have just received our copy of Finale 2011 and
G'day
We have just received our copy of Finale 2011 and are about to install it.
We currently have FonWin 2004b installed on a desktop pc and a laptop.
The install card says that we are only allowed to install the program on 2
computers. I'm intending to replace the desktop computer this year. How
Darcy James Argue wrote:
As far as the Nicole Simpson murder, you are correct, but
of course O.J. Simpson was convicted of armed robbery,
kidnapping, and other felonies on Oct. 3, 2008, and is
currently serving a minimum 9-year sentence.
You're correct -- I should have been more specific that
As far as the Nicole Simpson murder, you are correct, but of course O.J.
Simpson was convicted of armed robbery, kidnapping, and other felonies on Oct.
3, 2008, and is currently serving a minimum 9-year sentence.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O._J._Simpson
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB: http://www.se
Indeed. There is a BIG difference between Criminal and Civil Cases. I think the
original poster needs to bone up on this..
On Jul 11, 2010, at 11:45 AM, dhbailey wrote:
>
> O.J. was never convicted of anything -- he simply lost a lawsuit as defendant
> and was forced to pay the penalty that
At 2:38 PM -0400 7/11/10, dhbailey wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
It's really crucial to maintain the distinction between the two,
seems to me, and getting all bent out of shape about the idiots
going after the Girl Scouts (ASCAP will surely lose in court if EFF
or somebody else steps up to d
John Howell wrote:
At 1:41 PM -0400 7/11/10, Blake Richardson wrote:
From: John Howell
If there IS a single problem, it's obviously the one we've all been
aware of all the time: the progress of technology has made new
crimes not only possible but really, really EASY!
Copyright infringem
Blake Richardson wrote:
[snip]> All sorts of scary stuff is happening in Europe
under the umbrella of
"artists' rights". There's a proposal (don't know whether it's made it into
law yet) to give sculptors and painters the right of first refusal on sales
of their work. Under such a system, if you
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 10 Jul 2010 at 5:59, dhbailey wrote:
my post was quoted by Blake Richardson, who
then went on the tirade against stupid things done in the
name of copyright protection.
No, those were done in the name of enforcing performance rights,
which is distinctly different f
At 1:41 PM -0400 7/11/10, Blake Richardson wrote:
From: John Howell
If there IS a single problem, it's obviously the one we've all been
aware of all the time: the progress of technology has made new
crimes not only possible but really, really EASY!
Copyright infringement is generally not
On 9 Jul 2010 at 19:42, Blake Richardson wrote:
> It's this sort of draconian, heavy-handed thuggish approach to
> copyright that's turning off an entire generation of people from
> respecting it.
Not a single one of your examples has anything at all to do with
copyright or copyright enforcement
On 10 Jul 2010 at 5:59, dhbailey wrote:
> my post was quoted by Blake Richardson, who
> then went on the tirade against stupid things done in the
> name of copyright protection.
No, those were done in the name of enforcing performance rights,
which is distinctly different from copyright. Copyr
From: John Howell
Reply-To:
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:01:44 -0400
To:
Subject: Re: [Finale] OT: Copyright and downloadable music
> If there IS a single problem, it's obviously the one we've all been
> aware of all the time: the progress of technology has made new
> crimes not only possible bu
Hi Phil--
http://www.google.com/alerts
Monitor the Web for interesting new content
Google Alerts are email updates of the latest relevant Google
results (web, news, etc.) based on your choice of query or topic.
Enter the topic you wish to monitor, then click preview to see the
type of re
At 7/11/2010 09:29 AM, Nigel Hanley wrote:
>I receive Google alerts whenever someone searches for my blog, or my name,
>which is hardly ever, but last night I got one and instead of it being from
How do you sign up for alerts?
___
Finale mailing list
Nigel Hanley wrote:
I receive Google alerts whenever someone searches for my blog, or my name,
which is hardly ever, but last night I got one and instead of it being from the
bloke whose blog I comment on, but he won't comment on mine, as usually is the
case, it was from this list!
Were you
I receive Google alerts whenever someone searches for my blog, or my name,
which is hardly ever, but last night I got one and instead of it being from the
bloke whose blog I comment on, but he won't comment on mine, as usually is the
case, it was from this list!
Sorry for the long sentence, but
20 matches
Mail list logo
