This is the situation that started this thread - needing the staff style to
hide a cue in the score.
JB
Sent from my iPhone using my thumbs w/out a spellchecker
On Apr 21, 2012, at 12:44 AM, Christopher Smith
wrote:
> We haven't mentioned this yet, but cues that are designed ONLY to help the
On Fri Apr 20, at FridayApr 20 10:40 PM, John Howell wrote:
> At 9:27 PM -0400 4/20/12, Christopher Smith wrote:
>> No, I wouldn't. With the cue in the same layer as the real music, it
>> shows up correctly, even with voiced parts.
>>
>> If you don't want the cue to show in the score, you can h
At 9:27 PM -0400 4/20/12, Christopher Smith wrote:
>No, I wouldn't. With the cue in the same layer as the real music, it
>shows up correctly, even with voiced parts.
>
>If you don't want the cue to show in the score, you can hide it with
>a staff style there, and hide the rests if necessary. I ha
No, I wouldn't. With the cue in the same layer as the real music, it
shows up correctly, even with voiced parts.
If you don't want the cue to show in the score, you can hide it with
a staff style there, and hide the rests if necessary. I have been
conducting a lot of concert band music recen
Chris, in this scenario, would you even be using the staff style?
On Apr 20, 2012, at 4:21 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
> That's a good solution, until there is a bar where the cue occurs along with
> real notes to be played. I put in the rests as expressions.
>
> Christopher
>
>
> On Fri Apr
I prefer to use 2010, but the publisher I work most with uses only 2011, so I
use that for scores intended for them. I have started experimenting some with
2012; so far, no big issues, once I found the Score Manager.
(Mr.) Jamin Hoffman
2745 S. 44th St.
Milwaukee, WI 53219
(414) 218-2130
jtb
That's a good solution, until there is a bar where the cue occurs along with
real notes to be played. I put in the rests as expressions.
Christopher
On Fri Apr 20, at FridayApr 20 4:18 PM, John Blane wrote:
> Re-define the staff style to NOT show notes in other layers
>
> On Apr 20, 2012, at
Re-define the staff style to NOT show notes in other layers
On Apr 20, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Greg Hamilton wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I'm currently working with a score with linked parts. I'm creating cues in
> Layer 4 and then applying (in the score) the Staff Style blank notation with
> rests.
Hello Everyone,
I'm currently working with a score with linked parts. I'm creating cues in
Layer 4 and then applying (in the score) the Staff Style blank notation with
rests. This works fine until you create a REAL whole rest in the part and
vertically reposition the rest. The whole rest is the
I'm very happy with Finale 2011 (Win) but am weighing whether Unicode is
important enough to switch to 2012. (On the other hand, because I
occasionally do Sibelius work, I did the upgrade from 6 to 7 for a
specific project, but that's been regrettable, as the new ribbon design is
an eye k
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:17 AM, rglan wrote:
> You seem to be the only person here currently
> using 2011, everyone else seems to have jumped
> from 2010-->2012. I wonder why? I guess I'll just ...
I've stayed with Win2011 because I really don't like the current implementation
of the Score Mana
Apple also has released 10.6 for free in the hopes that people will
use that and then upgrade to Lion. You might want to check it out.
Going from 10.5 to 10.6 resulted in speed increases for my macs
Sent from my iSomething
--
On Apr 20, 2012, at 8:51 AM, Harold Owen wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
>
Hello everyone,
It's been a while since I posted here. I'm using 2011 and have no
major complaints. I'm on Mac using System 10.5.8. I'll consider
getting Finale 2012B when it's available and when I can upgrade my
system. I really like the convenience of using XML with friends who
have Sibelius
2011 mac fine for me.
Steve P.
On 19 Apr 2012, at 13:20, Christopher Smith
wrote:
>
> On Thu Apr 19, at ThursdayApr 19 2:14 AM, dershem wrote:
>
>>
>> The only option I would like that 2010 doesn't have is to hide staves in
>> the piano part, and I am used to doing that with a T-square and
I can only think of one reason not to go from Fin11 to Fin12, esp. if you
can use the Unicode. The Score Manager changes call for a little adjustment
in how you do things, but the significant regression matters only if you
need to enter a lot of instrumental music from before 1900 into Finale. In
t
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:17 AM, rglan wrote:
> You seem to be the only person here currently
> using 2011, everyone else seems to have jumped
> from 2010-->2012. I wonder why? I guess I'll just ...
>
o/ (Hand raised.)
WinFin2011 I like it - no real problems,
Raymond Horton
Bass Trombonist,
At 6:44 PM +1000 20/4/12, Rod McDonald wrote:
>I am amazed anyone actually lives at RAGLAN!!..
But are you amazed that RAGLAN actually lives? ;-)
>I still use 2011..first year I haven't upgraded since 2005
That's encouraging, merci
___
Finale mailing l
Hi David! I am amazed anyone actually lives at RAGLAN!!..I still use
2011..first year I haven't upgraded since 2005. Rod. Katoomba.
-Original Message-
From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of
rglan
Sent: Friday, 20 April 2012 6:17 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
S
Memorias d'Andouille
Le 18/4/12 21:24 PM +0200, Claude Guéganno a écrit:
> > Andouille mailing list
> > andoui...@shsu.edu
> > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/andouille
Lol :-D
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/ma
At 8:21 AM +1000 19/4/12, David McKay wrote:
>Raglan is the name of a village which is en route to
>Sydney, from Bathurst, where I live.
it's also a very famous surfing break in N.Z. :-)
>Wondering if you have ever transcribed The London Derrière?
Transcribed for what? As it happens I have
tran
20 matches
Mail list logo
