Visit
http://robertgpatterson.com/-fininfo/finmain.html
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Martin Nickless
wrote:
> Can you let me know how I can get your plugins
> Could use all those that you say
> And hopefully make work faster
> Best
> Martin
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> ___
Can you let me know how I can get your plugins
Could use all those that you say
And hopefully make work faster
Best
Martin
Sent from my iPhone
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
To unsubscribe from
Hi Jan
The Jari's plugin "JW Copy Part Layout" does not work on Finale.v25. Only
two plugins have been adapted to 64bits JW accidentals and JW Staff
polyphony. And they work well with Finale v25
Jean-Paul Gilles
[1]www.2mceditions.com
Le 24/08/2016 à 17:11, Jan Angermüll
yes I have - I was more referring to copying layouts (note spacing mainly)
within one part
but will try Robert’s plugin.
If it works as advertised - what will I do with all my spare time??!!
Thomas
On Aug 24, 2016, at 10:11 AM, Jan Angermüller wrote:
> Have you tried the "JW Copy Part Layout"
Have you tried the "JW Copy Part Layout" plugin for copying layout
things between linked parts ?
http://www.finaletips.nu/index.php/download/category/9-plug-ins-for-windows
Jan
Am 24.08.2016 um 15:45 schrieb Thomas Schaller:
> Robert,
> deal breaker for me regarding linked parts is that you ca
alright - I’ll give it a try.
Thanks!
Thomas
On Aug 24, 2016, at 9:30 AM, Robert Patterson
wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> I address both of those issues with plugins. Copying slur shapes is trivial
> with my Mass Copy plugin (both in score and parts). As for spacing, I
> almost never manually modify spa
Thomas,
I address both of those issues with plugins. Copying slur shapes is trivial
with my Mass Copy plugin (both in score and parts). As for spacing, I
almost never manually modify spacing any more now that I have the Note
Spacing plugin (part of my plugin suite as well). Probably the number one
Robert,
deal breaker for me regarding linked parts is that you cannot copy certain
things from measure to measure in linked parts. For instance, I often fine tune
measure layouts in parts and if I have a part that repeats measures that
individual edit cannot be copied to other measures - instead
I don't think 2012 is faster than 25. It may be roughly comparable. Where
25 really blows away the earlier versions is in starting up human playback.
I also wouldn't let the print dialog issues stop you from upgrading. Though
the issues are annoying and glaring, there are workarounds. The actual
p
There are complaints in every version. The question is whether you can live
with them. If 2012 works for you (it won’t install on my new Mac) it apparently
is quicker than 2014, 2014.5 or v. 25, so you could stick with it. The files
can be shared with other users of newer versions, and they can
Hi Martin,
I would definitely recommend you to upgrade to the new version. 64-bit support
and faster playback are extremely important for a good and fast workflow.
If you only do some minor things with Finale, sticking with Finale 2012 might
be ok, but I think, if you work professionally and w
Hi from what I've read I definitely won't be upgrading
May I ask what the consensus is as to which is the best version of finale
I seem to remember many complaints about 2014
I'm currently still on finale 2012 using Windows 10
Would be good to know
_
12 matches
Mail list logo
