David's post says it all. I especially like :
David W. Fenton wrote:
...
When I was teaching at NYU, I always used to say that the best way to
proofread the materials I was handing out to students was to make 50
copies of it and then read it -- at that point, every single error
would stand
When I print parts, I often do some reformatting I would NOT like in
the original score. However, I often correct or re-arrange some
notes, and it would be very nice to have them automatically corrected
in the score, as well. Also, added articulations and such. Or I find
a faulty lyric in an ex
Best thing to do is download the Sib 4 demo and experiment with
Dynamic Parts. Then email MM and tell them what you like and don't
like about Sib's implementation.
Trust me, after actually trying it out for a while, you will run into
all sorts of dilemmas you hadn't previously considered, s
At 06:51 PM 12/14/2005, Kurt Gnos wrote:
>So - the best link, in my opinion, would be to have everything linked
>- but not formatting and all things related.
Not to rehash the discussion we had in depth when the latest version
of Sibelius came out -- but this is just how Sibelius does it. Data
Raymond Horton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Nothing points out mistakes like a printer and on-site use, for some
>reason.Dynamic linking wouldn't help in the above situation, but I
>do face a huge project in which I have done hundreds of changes to an
>orchestral work that has already been per
Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 06:51 PM 12/14/2005, Kurt Gnos wrote:
>So - the best link, in my opinion, would be to have everything linked
>- but not formatting and all things related.
Not to rehash the discussion we had in depth when the latest version of
Sibelius came out -- but this is just h
Kurt Gnos wrote:
When I print parts, I often do some reformatting I would NOT like in the
original score. However, I often correct or re-arrange some notes, and
it would be very nice to have them automatically corrected in the score,
as well. Also, added articulations and such. Or I find a faul
Raymond Horton wrote:
>... but I
>do face a huge project in which I have done hundreds of changes to an
>orchestral work that has already been performed. I'm not looking
>forward to re-extracting the parts, but I have no other choice. The
>old parts will help save time, but it will still tak
Agreed. But this may be quite complicated... Say, I extract a guitar
part, add a TAB system, change the frettings... Or, worse, save it
under a new name...;-)
Not that I wouldn't like it, but I see some heavy and dangerous
programming coming up...
Kurt
At 11:40 15.12.2005, you wrote:
Kurt Gn
