RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-12 Thread John Howell
Nope. John At 11:31 AM -0400 10/12/06, Williams, Jim wrote: John, What's happening now? I got a report that now the MESSAGE ITSELF is being duplicated... Do you see that?? Jim From: John Howell Sent: Thu 12-Oct-06 11:10 To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: RE: [Finale] Getting rid o

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-12 Thread David W. Fenton
On 12 Oct 2006 at 10:52, Ken Moore wrote: > Your posts arrive on the digest duplicated, which I don't recall > seeing from anyone else (though most posts carry more of the thread > than is necessary to establish context, as I have frequently pointed > out). This is because he's now sending his po

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-12 Thread David W. Fenton
On 12 Oct 2006 at 11:31, Williams, Jim wrote: > What's happening now? I got a report that now the MESSAGE ITSELF is > being duplicated... Do you see that?? It is being duplicated, once in plain text, once in HTML. The Digest just converts both to text. Get a decent email client and you won't ha

Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-12 Thread David W. Fenton
On 11 Oct 2006 at 22:12, Chuck Israels wrote: > I had no idea that my"signature" was being received as an > attachment. I thought it was in the body of the emails. I'm not seeing it as an attachment. > Is this a bother to anyone? > > No one has ever mentioned it. I'm seeing a two-part messa

Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-12 Thread A-NO-NE Music
There is an easier solution to this. Mailman2, the host software of this list has an option to disable attachment. The user group I admin enables this option, or digest gets messed up. -- - Hiro Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA __

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-12 Thread Williams, Jim
John,   What's happening now? I got a report that now the MESSAGE ITSELF is being duplicated... Do you see that?? Jim From: John HowellSent: Thu 12-Oct-06 11:10To: finale@shsu.eduSubject: RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments At 11:41 PM -0400 10/11/06, Williams, Jim wrote: &g

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-12 Thread John Howell
At 11:41 PM -0400 10/11/06, Williams, Jim wrote: OK--it APPEARS I got rid of ONE attachment by reinstalling some kind of S/MIME control that I had installed earlier in OWA. It doesn't say what the control is or does--perhaps some of you know--but it SEEMS to have zapped ONE of the attachments

Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-12 Thread Phil Daley
At 10/12/2006 01:12 AM, Chuck Israels wrote: I had no idea that my"signature" was being received as an attachment. I thought it was in the body of the emails. Is this a bother to anyone? No one has ever mentioned it. I just go through my attachment folder once a week and delete the accumu

Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-12 Thread Christopher Smith
On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:12 AM, Chuck Israels wrote: Hi all, I had no idea that my"signature" was being received as an attachment. I thought it was in the body of the emails. Is this a bother to anyone? No one has ever mentioned it. I don't see any attachments in your emails to the list.

Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-12 Thread Christopher Smith
On Oct 11, 2006, at 8:10 PM, Williams, Jim wrote: One list member has asked me very politely if I could cease this practice and another occasionally sends me a few return emails stressing a particular french obscenity. I would like to comply with the polite request and would hope that

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-12 Thread Ken Moore
"Williams, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A question arises, though: why are these attachments viewed by some people > as (ob)noxious? I could see an issue, perhaps, if people are on dialup or > billed by the byte, but the attachments are actually quite small, yes?? Having broadband, I'm re

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-12 Thread Ken Moore
"Williams, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The problem occurs when I *reply to* messages, not when I initiate a topic. Perhaps I didn't stress that aspect enough. I already noticed that. I notice that a few other users have the same situation. Your posts arrive on the digest duplicated, wh

Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread Chuck Israels
that. I'll see if it exists on PC platform. Also...I see you have the ONE small attachment as well, the little signature of 198 bytes.   JimFrom: Chuck IsraelsSent: Wed 11-Oct-06 23:49To: finale@shsu.eduSubject: Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments Hi Jim, No, it wasn't an at

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread Williams, Jim
es until I knock off... From: David W. FentonSent: Wed 11-Oct-06 23:54To: finale@shsu.eduSubject: RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments On 11 Oct 2006 at 23:41, Williams, Jim wrote: > OK--it APPEARS I got rid of ONE attachment by reinstalling some kind > of S/MIME control that I had i

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread David W. Fenton
On 11 Oct 2006 at 23:37, Williams, Jim wrote: > Could this whole point become moot if Henry simply set things at his > end to block all attachments? I think Chuck Israels sent a "bona fide" > attachment yesterday or today, but I usually don't see that many real > attachments here, or do I just not

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread David W. Fenton
On 11 Oct 2006 at 23:41, Williams, Jim wrote: > OK--it APPEARS I got rid of ONE attachment by reinstalling some kind > of S/MIME control that I had installed earlier in OWA. It doesn't say > what the control is or does--perhaps some of you know--but it SEEMS to > have zapped ONE of the attachment

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread Williams, Jim
@shsu.eduSubject: RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments On 11 Oct 2006 at 23:19, Williams, Jim wrote: > Yes, David, that's it--replies only. > A question arises, though: why are these attachments viewed by some > people as (ob)noxious? I could see an issue, perhaps, if people are on &

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread Williams, Jim
e control is or does--perhaps some of you know--but it SEEMS to have zapped ONE of the attachments--the repeated message. Let's see how THIS one works! Jim From: Williams, JimSent: Wed 11-Oct-06 23:37To: finale@shsu.eduSubject: RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments Could this whole p

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread David W. Fenton
On 11 Oct 2006 at 23:32, John Howell wrote: > At 11:19 PM -0400 10/11/06, Williams, Jim wrote: > >Yes, David, that's it--replies only. > >A question arises, though: why are these attachments viewed by some > >people as (ob)noxious? I could see an issue, perhaps, if people are > >on dialup or bille

Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread Chuck Israels
f you know--but it SEEMS to have zapped ONE of the attachments--the repeated message. Let's see how THIS one works! Jim From: Williams, JimSent: Wed 11-Oct-06 23:37To: finale@shsu.eduSubject: RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments Could this whole point become moot if Henry simply set th

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread Williams, Jim
w THIS one works! Jim From: Williams, JimSent: Wed 11-Oct-06 23:37To: finale@shsu.eduSubject: RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments Could this whole point become moot if Henry simply set things at his end to block all attachments? I think Chuck Israels sent a "bona fide" attachmen

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread David W. Fenton
On 11 Oct 2006 at 23:19, Williams, Jim wrote: > Yes, David, that's it--replies only. > A question arises, though: why are these attachments viewed by some > people as (ob)noxious? I could see an issue, perhaps, if people are on > dialup or billed by the byte, but the attachments are actually quite

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread John Howell
At 11:19 PM -0400 10/11/06, Williams, Jim wrote: Yes, David, that's it--replies only. A question arises, though: why are these attachments viewed by some people as (ob)noxious? I could see an issue, perhaps, if people are on dialup or billed by the byte, but the attachments are actually quite

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread Williams, Jim
ed 11-Oct-06 23:22To: finale@shsu.eduSubject: Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments At 10:40 PM -0400 10/11/06, David W. Fenton wrote: > >I'm not sure you have a problem, but it could be because I don't have >a signature or VCARD configured on my Outlook account. Those mi

Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread John Howell
At 10:40 PM -0400 10/11/06, David W. Fenton wrote: I'm not sure you have a problem, but it could be because I don't have a signature or VCARD configured on my Outlook account. Those might be what direct recipients are seeing, and including either of them as an attachment is plain rude on Exchan

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread Williams, Jim
_ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David W. Fenton Sent: Wed 11-Oct-06 23:03 To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments On 11 Oct 2006 at 22:52, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote: > At 10:40 PM 10/11/06 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote: > >I don't see a

RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread Williams, Jim
post (in reply to my original), to which I am sending this reply, and 2. The Finale group "signature." Let's see... Again thanks to the three of you! Jim From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David W. Fenton Sent: Wed 11-Oct-06 22:40 To: finale@shsu.ed

Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread David W. Fenton
On 11 Oct 2006 at 22:52, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote: > At 10:40 PM 10/11/06 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote: > >I don't see any attachment on this message that I'm replying to. The > >listserv seems to have stripped it, if it was there. > > I'm getting them. They're coming in as attachments with nam

Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
At 10:40 PM 10/11/06 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote: >I don't see any attachment on this message that I'm replying to. The >listserv seems to have stripped it, if it was there. I'm getting them. They're coming in as attachments with names like "msg-7775-7661.txt" with the full text content of the m

Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread Peter Taylor
- Original Message - From: "Williams, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 1:10 AM Subject: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments Friends... I send my Finale posts via an email system established by my employer using MS Outlook Web Access.

Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread David W. Fenton
On 11 Oct 2006 at 20:10, Williams, Jim wrote: > I send my Finale posts via an email system established by my employer > using MS Outlook Web Access. For some reason unknown to me, > attachments are created when I reply to posts on this list, consisting > of a copy of the message to which I am repl

[Finale] Getting rid of the attachments

2006-10-11 Thread Williams, Jim
Friends... I send my Finale posts via an email system established by my employer using MS Outlook Web Access. For some reason unknown to me, attachments are created when I reply to posts on this list, consisting of a copy of the message to which I am replying and a copy of some kind of Finale