Chuck Israels wrote:
Hi David,
The problem is that things don't work the way one might imagine if you
leave that Break Multi-measure Rest box unchecked. If you have a 6 m.
rest with an expression attached to the last measure, the program only
accommodates (shows) expressions attached to
On 28-Dec-06, at 5:20 AM, dhbailey wrote:
Chuck Israels wrote:
Hi David,
The problem is that things don't work the way one might imagine if
you leave that Break Multi-measure Rest box unchecked. If you
have a 6 m. rest with an expression attached to the last measure,
the program only
On Dec 28, 2006, at 2:20 AM, dhbailey wrote:
Chuck Israels wrote:
Hi David,
The problem is that things don't work the way one might imagine if
you leave that Break Multi-measure Rest box unchecked. If you
have a 6 m. rest with an expression attached to the last measure,
the program
Hi all,
When you define a measure expression to break a MM rest, it separates
that measure from a group mm rest. (I can't figure out how else it
could work, but I'm hoping.) So, when you have a To Coda sign that
happens to appear at the end of 6 measures of rest in a part, that mm
rest
Chuck Israels wrote:
Hi all,
When you define a measure expression to break a MM rest, it separates
that measure from a group mm rest. (I can't figure out how else it
could work, but I'm hoping.) So, when you have a To Coda sign that
happens to appear at the end of 6 measures of rest in a
Hi David,
The problem is that things don't work the way one might imagine if
you leave that Break Multi-measure Rest box unchecked. If you have
a 6 m. rest with an expression attached to the last measure, the
program only accommodates (shows) expressions attached to the first
measure of
In a message dated 12/27/06 7:30:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is that things don't work the way one might imagine if
you leave that Break Multi-measure Rest box unchecked. If you have
a 6 m. rest with an expression attached to the last measure, the
program only
See, now there's a solution that hadn't occurred to me.
(See below)
As usual, a simple enough one - lateral thinking.
Thank you John, I will try this.
Chuck
On Dec 27, 2006, at 5:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/27/06 7:30:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The
