Hi Scott,
Thanks for your help. That's the look I want but it would obviously be
better if it could be accomplished in a time signature w/out the help of an
expression. I experimented with using some other expressions instead of the
time signature plus sign, but as far as I can tell, any item
Horace Brock wrote:
What would be the best way to do two time signatures in the same
staff? Say you had a triple meter that could be triple-duple or
triple-triple (3/4 or 9/8), what would be the best way to put the two
side by side at the beginning of the piece? The source has the second
sig in
Horace Brock wrote:
What would be the best way to do two time signatures in the same
staff? Say you had a triple meter that could be triple-duple or
triple-triple (3/4 or 9/8), what would be the best way to put the two
side by side at the beginning of the piece? The source has the second
sig in
At 07:37 AM 01/22/2005, dhbailey wrote:
I would only add that you can configure the default appearance of
triplets before you begin to enter the notes and set things so that no
bracket and no number shows up, to make life easier.
Or, after inserting your double time sig, you can then define the
Thanks, Scott - that's helpful to know. When I first tried it I didn't like
how close the two signatures were to each other (looked like a time sig. of
93/84), but I enlarged the font size of the space to make it look right.
Gardner Read refers to this and similar situations as combined meters
What would be the best way to do two time signatures in the same
staff? Say you had a triple meter that could be triple-duple or
triple-triple (3/4 or 9/8), what would be the best way to put the two
side by side at the beginning of the piece? The source has the second
sig in parentheses.
I
