On Apr 15, 2007, at 6:15 PM, Neal Gittleman wrote:
Living in a world that seems to unduly prize consistency, we're
obliged to be more precise in our notation. (And even if we don't
feel so-obliged, Finale will oblige us!)
That last parenthetical comment is one of the most insightful thi
Charles:
Wow, that is a doozy. I'd read it the same way you do...
But it's disconcerting that the same notation which seems to be a
tuplet in m5 is an ordinary dotted-quarter-plus-8th in m4 and m6!
Me:
Though probably not disconcerting to folks of the time, when there
was so much about mu
On 15-Apr-07, at 3:31 PM, Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
(Graupner). You can see a screenshot of the manuscript here:
http://www.bytenet.net/kpclow/brian/graupner/sarabande.jpg
The troublesome issue for me is measure 5, I assume the first three
notes are tuplet, then the next three, then the next t
