On Jan 21, 2013, at 10:14 AM, Phil Daley wrote:
> I don't get it at all.
>
> Where is the alto line?
>
> What it the bottom clef? Tenor or bass? It doesn't have any help for any
> verse.
>
> For 4 part hymns, this would be way too confusing to do stuff like that on
> all 4 parts.
I think w
Exactly.
It would be way too confusing to do that to 4 part hymns.
At 1/21/2013 01:38 PM, dc wrote:
>Le 21/01/2013 19:14, Phil Daley écrit :
>> I don't get it at all.
>>
>> Where is the alto line?
>>
>> What it the bottom clef? Tenor or bass? It doesn't have any help for any
>> verse.
At 1/21/2013 12:05 PM, Mark D Lew wrote:
>On Jan 21, 2013, at 5:35 AM, dc wrote:
>
>> Many thanks to all for the sound advice. I'm still wondering if the
>> reduction is absolutely necessary or not - i.e. whether it makes things
>> clearer or not. I have three verses, but never more than two
On Jan 21, 2013, at 5:35 AM, dc wrote:
> Many thanks to all for the sound advice. I'm still wondering if the
> reduction is absolutely necessary or not - i.e. whether it makes things
> clearer or not. I have three verses, but never more than two different
> configurations. I'm not quite sure ei
Lyrics will remain full-sized if you reduce noteheads. They will change if you
reduce notes. Fortunately, there is now a plugin to do that.
On Jan 20, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
> I've dealt with this before and the lyrics get reduced along with the reduced
> noteheads, plus you
On Jan 20, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
> I've dealt with this before and the lyrics get reduced along with the reduced
> noteheads, plus you have to assign them to a different layer and that causes
> lyric extension issues. I could try using a fixed font size for the lyrics,
> bu
I've dealt with this before and the lyrics get reduced along with the reduced
noteheads, plus you have to assign them to a different layer and that causes
lyric extension issues. I could try using a fixed font size for the lyrics, but
that starts to get touchy, especially since I can't specify f
On 1/20/2013 12:38 PM, dc wrote:
> Suppose you have several verses under the same music, but with small
> variants in the syllabification between verses - two notes for one
> syllable in one verse but two syllables in another.
>
> What's the standard way of indicating this if the beaming follows th
I'm not sure if this is the exact situation Noel is describing, but if you have
a situation where verse 1 has one syllable on a quarter note and verse 2 has
two syllables on repeated eighth notes on the same pitch, I would NOT write it
as two eighths with a dotted tie. I would write it as a qua
On Jan 20, 2013, at 9:38 AM, dc wrote:
> Suppose you have several verses under the same music, but with small
> variants in the syllabification between verses - two notes for one
> syllable in one verse but two syllables in another.
>
> What's the standard way of indicating this if the beaming
Dennis,
Regarding your question,
> Suppose you have several verses under the same music, but with small
> variants in the syllabification between verses - two notes for one
> syllable in one verse but two syllables in another.
>
> What's the standard way of indicating this if the beaming follows t
11 matches
Mail list logo
