Re: [Fink-beginners] startkde and quartz-wm

2006-11-02 Thread Alex Lemerle
Well, thanks a lot ! I checked again : quartz-wm uses 1.8 MB when idle, and then , from the moment I copy (from nedit) or use any Mac command in X11, memory usage increases linearly of 1MB per 15s (200MB after 50 minutes usage !). Funny heh ? I guess you can't touch this (quartz-wm) anyways.

Re: [Fink-beginners] startkde and quartz-wm

2006-11-02 Thread Benjamin Reed
Al Lem wrote: > thanks ! > > Ok, yes, I see, I never realized that we could copy from X11, which is very > usefull. And you are right (of course!) it does not work without quartz-wm. > But is it normal that quartz-wm starts using 2MB when I start kde, but > slowly increases, continuously, up to

Re: [Fink-beginners] startkde and quartz-wm

2006-11-02 Thread Al Lem
thanks ! Ok, yes, I see, I never realized that we could copy from X11, which is very usefull. And you are right (of course!) it does not work without quartz-wm. But is it normal that quartz-wm starts using 2MB when I start kde, but slowly increases, continuously, up to 200MB (and more...) ? t

Re: [Fink-beginners] startkde and quartz-wm

2006-11-02 Thread Benjamin Reed
Al Lem wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone have an idea why quartz-wm starts with startkde even if kwin is > used as the window manager (under X11). Not only it starts, but it slowly > takes more and more RAM (up to 200 MB !). I usually simply kill it by hand > (and this does not generate any proble

[Fink-beginners] startkde and quartz-wm

2006-11-02 Thread Al Lem
Hi, Does anyone have an idea why quartz-wm starts with startkde even if kwin is used as the window manager (under X11). Not only it starts, but it slowly takes more and more RAM (up to 200 MB !). I usually simply kill it by hand (and this does not generate any problem in kde, which proves tha