Re: [Fink-devel] Initial splitoffs code now in CVS

2002-03-07 Thread Max Horn
At 22:23 Uhr -0500 06.03.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: >Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >[snip] >> Besides the big chunk, splitoff support, I changed a few other minor >> things, most notably percent expansion is now also done in the >> Depends/BuildDepends/Conflicts/Replaces/Provides fi

Re: [Fink-devel] Cannot install fort77: directory gone

2002-03-07 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Ben: This has been fixed for some time - all you have to do is "fink selfupdate-cvs". The URL is now ibiblio.org. Hopefully it is more stable, but how can you really know? -Jeff On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Ben Gertzfield wrote: > I tried to install imagemagick today from unstable, and when it got t

Re: [Fink-devel] Cannot install fort77: directory gone

2002-03-07 Thread Jeff Whitaker
> I tried to install imagemagick today from unstable, and when it got to > the point where it downloaded the fort77 source (why the heck does an > image processor need Fortran? *grumble*) And BTW: this comes from the hdf5 dependency. hdf5 depends on hdf, which depends on f2c fortran. If people

Re: [Fink-devel] Cannot install fort77: directory gone

2002-03-07 Thread Max Horn
At 13:14 Uhr +0900 07.03.2002, Ben Gertzfield wrote: >I tried to install imagemagick today from unstable, and when it got to >the point where it downloaded the fort77 source (why the heck does an >image processor need Fortran? *grumble*) it failed: > >The following package will be installed or upd

[Fink-devel] linking question

2002-03-07 Thread Benjamin Reed
I was working on splitoff-ifying my rrdtool package, and while checking everything, I noticed that the version info isn't ending up into the library: ---(snip!)--- /sw/lib/librrd-1.0.33.dylib: /sw/lib/librrd-1.0.33.dylib (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) /usr/l

Re: [Fink-devel] Cannot install fort77: directory gone

2002-03-07 Thread David R. Morrison
Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And BTW: this comes from the hdf5 dependency. hdf5 depends on hdf, which > depends on f2c fortran. If people really don't like that, I can remove > the hdf5 dependency from imagemagick. Who really uses hdf to store images > anyway? Maybe this is a go

[Fink-devel] GNU mkdir?

2002-03-07 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 there is a problem with the docbook-dtd-4.1.2-1 install script. the last mkdir, where it breaks, breaks because there is a trailing /. it needs to be removed (or at least given the -p switch), or GNU mkdir from fileutils chokes: Compile phase: not

Re: [Fink-devel] Cannot install fort77: directory gone

2002-03-07 Thread Ben Gertzfield
> "Jeff" == Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jeff> And BTW: this comes from the hdf5 dependency. hdf5 depends Jeff> on hdf, which depends on f2c fortran. If people really Jeff> don't like that, I can remove the hdf5 dependency from Jeff> imagemagick. Who really use

Re: [Fink-devel] Initial plitoffs code now in CVS

2002-03-07 Thread Benjamin Reed
Max Horn [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > I just added code to CVS that enables initial splitoff support. All > brave developers please go ahead and install it and test how it > works. To do so, check out the "fink" CVS module and use the > inject.pl script. Other than my libtool versioning issue

[Fink-devel] Splitoffs: try 'em, but don't put 'em into regular CVS!

2002-03-07 Thread Max Horn
Just to clarify one thing: you are welcome to try and get your packages working using splitoffs, but don'T check those into the regular fink cvs just yet, since 99% of users won't be able to use them yet - you can start putting them into regular CVS once Fink 0.9.9 has been released. In the

Re: [Fink-devel] GNU mkdir?

2002-03-07 Thread Max Horn
At 9:21 Uhr -0500 07.03.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >there is a problem with the docbook-dtd-4.1.2-1 install script. the >last mkdir, where it breaks, breaks because there is a trailing /. >it needs to be removed (or at least given the -p switch

Re: [Fink-devel] Splitoffs: try 'em, but don't put 'em into regular CVS!

2002-03-07 Thread David R. Morrison
> Just to clarify one thing: you are welcome to try and get your > packages working using splitoffs, but don'T check those into the > regular fink cvs just yet, since 99% of users won't be able to use > them yet - you can start putting them into regular CVS once Fink > 0.9.9 has been released.

Re: [Fink-devel] GNU mkdir?

2002-03-07 Thread Finlay Dobbie
On Thursday, March 7, 2002, at 05:48 PM, Max Horn wrote: > 1) docbook-dtd should be "fixed" to not use a trailing slash > 2) Somebody shouild take a look at the fileutils package, and add a > workaround for this to the mkdir command (and possible rm and other > commands that may be affected).

Re: [Fink-devel] Initial plitoffs code now in CVS

2002-03-07 Thread Max Horn
At 12:42 Uhr -0500 07.03.2002, Benjamin Reed wrote: >Max Horn [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: >> I just added code to CVS that enables initial splitoff support. All >> brave developers please go ahead and install it and test how it >> works. To do so, check out the "fink" CVS module and use the >>

Re: [Fink-devel] GNU mkdir?

2002-03-07 Thread Max Horn
At 19:08 Uhr + 07.03.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote: >On Thursday, March 7, 2002, at 05:48 PM, Max Horn wrote: > >>1) docbook-dtd should be "fixed" to not use a trailing slash >>2) Somebody shouild take a look at the fileutils package, and add a >>workaround for this to the mkdir command (and poss

Re: [Fink-devel] GNU mkdir?

2002-03-07 Thread Sasha Zucker
Good old, reliable Apple. Ok, I have removed the trailing /s from every docbook related package and posted the updated files to the fink package submission page ("docbook-* fixes and updates"). Also, I updated the nwalsh dsssl stylesheet package to 1.76. On Thursday, March 7, 2002, at 09:48 A

Re: [Fink-devel] GNU mkdir? and double messages

2002-03-07 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 the problem does not occur when the -p option is used...only when it is used without it, eg.: mkdir me/ would fail. on a side note, i seem to be getting doubles of messages on this list, the first one without the sourceforge footer, and the second

Re: [Fink-devel] GNU mkdir? and double messages

2002-03-07 Thread Max Horn
At 14:42 Uhr -0500 07.03.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >the problem does not occur when the -p option is used...only when it >is used without it, eg.: mkdir me/ would fail. > >on a side note, i seem to be getting doubles of messages on this >list,

Re: [Fink-devel] Initial plitoffs code now in CVS

2002-03-07 Thread David R. Morrison
Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One question it does bring up, that I remember being mentioned before, > is that of library dependencies. Right now I have them set up with > dependencies like so, which was what I saw in examples when we were > first doing separate shlibs packages: >