On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 02:36 AM, Max Horn wrote:
At 23:06 Uhr -0800 26.02.2003, Ben Hines wrote:
Well, pogma at least read this and fixed his package, did anyone
else? Anyone else care? Is the shlibs field really that difficult to
get? Everyone clear on this? I better not see people
I'm working on porting xscreensaver. Each saver module is actually a
stand-alone binary and has an associated .1 manpage, but the binaries are
installed in a private area (cf. $FINK/bin). The problem is that (at
least) one module has the same name as another binary already in Fink, and
so there is
> for the fink-developers:
>
> i once submitted gael (Electronic design application for GNOME) and
> it's dependencies, like dia-newcanvas. it also used pygtk2 which i
> could not do right and asked for help. didn't get any reply. doesn't
> matter, it's packaged now. so may i ask you the follow
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> Well, according to the X website, XFree86 4.3 is due to get tagged
> tomorrow. Has anything been decided yet on how we are going to handle
> the 4.3 upgrade?
>
Ben:
I propose the following:
1) add an xfree86-4.3 package which will requires dpkg -r
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Andrea Riciputi wrote:
>
> I agree with you v2.3 is quite stable, but as far as I can see the
> problem is that I can't install some Python modules under v2.2 tree.
Andrea: I've renamed it 2.3a2 to make it clear that it's alpha.
>
> When I try, for example, "% fink install
On Thursday, Feb 27, 2003, at 17:19 Europe/Rome,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrea and Max: I have had users requesting a python23 package -
that's
why I put it there (in unstable only). You can easily switch back to
python22 if you want - "fink install python-2.2.2-4". And for what
it's
worth
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Andrea and Max: I have had users requesting a python23 package - that's
> why I put it there (in unstable only). You can easily switch back to
> python22 if you want - "fink install python-2.2.2-4". And for what it's
> worth, in my experience pyt
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Max Horn wrote:
>
> Esp. once the real 2.3 is released (due June, see also
> http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0283.html). Yes with the dpkg version
> scheme, 2.3a comes after 2.3. However, now that we have epochs, this
> isn't really a problem anymore... you can release 2.3a2, 2
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Andrea Riciputi wrote:
> On Thursday, Feb 27, 2003, at 12:16 Europe/Rome, Max Horn wrote:
>
> > Ho Hum, I have to wonder if it is a good idea to market python 2.3
> > Alpha 2 this way. People (like me) will see it and think "gee, a new
> > python version" w/o realizing that i
On Thursday, Feb 27, 2003, at 12:16 Europe/Rome, Max Horn wrote:
Ho Hum, I have to wonder if it is a good idea to market python 2.3
Alpha 2 this way. People (like me) will see it and think "gee, a new
python version" w/o realizing that it's an alpha version. Besides the
question whether we shou
WOULD YOU LIKE TO HAVE YOUR MESSAGE SEEN BY
OVER 15.4 MILLION OPT-IN, TARGETED PROSPECTS WEEKLY?
Below contains all the information you will ever need to market
your product or service on the Internet.
If you have a product, service, or message that you would like to get
out to Thousands, Hu
At 23:07 Uhr -0800 26.02.2003, Ben Hines wrote:
Did you email the maintainer?
yes, but today, because yesterday our mailsystem went crazy ...
I did also send this to "all" because the qt path difference (last
column) is maybe related to fink ... and not only to doxygen ...
Roland
---
michel
me again. now i had actually some time at home to investigate a little.
from what i've found:
- gtkglarea-1.99.0 is still the recent version. if i'm wrong here
please feel free to point me to the new sources.
- gtkglarea-1.99.0 counts as version2 (so does pygtk-1.99.xx).
- pygtk-1.99.15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I am gone from today until Monday evening. I know it might not be of
interest to anyone, but I am letting you know anyways. I will not be
able to do any announcement nor handle any press enquiries, so please
do that for me.
I have a lot of work
At 12:19 Uhr -0800 20.02.2003, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.2/unstable/crypto/finkinfo
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv6689
Added Files:
python23-2.3-2.info python23-2.3-2.patch
Log Message:
New upstream (alpha) version.
--- NEW FILE: python23-2.3-2.info ---
P
At 22:54 Uhr -0800 26.02.2003, Ben Hines wrote:
I know you said you think it did, but really i don't think it does
work without the revision in the BuildDepends:
Found Python version 2.3
Warning: Missing libxml2-python
Enabling debugger
checking for libxml libraries >= 2.5.2... configure: error:
At 23:06 Uhr -0800 26.02.2003, Ben Hines wrote:
Well, pogma at least read this and fixed his package, did anyone
else? Anyone else care? Is the shlibs field really that difficult to
get? Everyone clear on this? I better not see people updating
packages and doing it wrong. :)
Welcome in the real
17 matches
Mail list logo
