On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 06:24:07PM -0800, Matthias Neeracher wrote:
From: Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But more importantly, it appears you are having the default action
to be make install even in a SplitOff of a type:ruby package.
That seems bad.
I'll fix this ASAP (although I don't
I have this problem:
-there are two usable versions of ruby in fink
-ruby 1.6.8
-ruby 1.8.0
-there is an application (freeride) that works with either version but
it needs two extensions to the interpreter
-fxruby
-ripper
The extensions are packaged for both versions of interpreter
I have this problem:
-there are two usable versions of ruby in fink
-ruby 1.6.8
-ruby 1.8.0
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:28:33PM -0500, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 01:35:31PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Do you really need the *default* interpretter to have both, or just
know a path to an interpretter that has both? I.e
to show some possible configurations
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:22:04AM +0100, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:28:33PM -0500, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 01:35:31PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Do you really need the *default* interpretter to have both, or just
know a path to an
On 20 janv. 2004, at 16:55, Andrea Riciputi wrote:
Some days ago I sent the following message to the list, but I've got
no answer. I repost this hoping someone could help me.
Cheers,
Andrea.
=== Begin Original Message ===
Hi,
I've installed Gerben Wierda teTeX distribution with gs 8.0,
Ok. Thanks a lot.
Andrea.
On 20 Jan 2004, at 20:13, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
It happened before rsync updates came about, and you definitely can
use it for your own packages.
--
Alexander Hansen
Levitated Dipole Experiment
http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX
---
Andrea Riciputi
Science is like sex:
There used to exist the opinion that it is not very cumbersome to have
two ghostscripts installed, but I think this should be rethought.
Let me offer another point of view on this.
Last summer, we introduced virtual packages in Fink which replaced the
former system-xfree86 and system-perl
Uhm... virtual packages. I'm not sure to know what they are exactly.
Where can I find (and learn) something about them?
Thanks,
Andrea.
On 20 Jan 2004, at 22:43, David R. Morrison wrote:
There used to exist the opinion that it is not very cumbersome to have
two ghostscripts installed,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lincoln Peters wrote:
| I do have OpenOffice, and I do have the Dl_info files you described.
| Does this mean that I can trash /usr/local/include/dlfcn.h and
| /usr/local/lib/libdl.dylib without causing problems in OpenOffice?
|
You can trash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David R. Morrison wrote:
| I've been thinking we should try to do something similar with the remaining
| system-foo packages, or else scrap them. In fact, they cause quite a bit
| of trouble at present: for example, a binary user is often not given a
11 matches
Mail list logo
