On Aug 22, 2004, at 1:08 AM, jfm wrote:
Yes _ I can confirm that (apparently) the same problem arose here, as
I already mentioned to you,
with the sequence singular-factory singular-libfac macaulay2 (build
1666 of /usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/ppc/3.3/cc1plus),
and that it disappears with your build 16
On Aug 22, 2004, at 1:27 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
On Aug 21, 2004, at 7:08 PM, jfm wrote:
Martin,
Yes _ I can confirm that (apparently) the same problem arose here, as
I already mentioned to you,
with the sequence singular-factory singular-libfac macaulay2 (build
1666 of /usr/libexec/gcc/darw
(B (BOn Aug 21, 2004, at 7:08 PM, jfm wrote: (B (B (B(B (BOn Aug 21, 2004, at 9:35 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: (B (B (BMartin Costabel wrote: (B (B (B$B%]!<%k(b (B$B%U%)%s%9(B (Bwrote: (B (B[] (B (Bld: Undefined symbols: (B (BArray::transpose() const (B (B[] (B (BFailed
On Aug 21, 2004, at 9:35 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
ããã wrote:
[]
ld: Undefined symbols:
Array::transpose() const
[]
Failed: compiling octave-2.1.57-3 failed
Paul, I think I have narrowed this down to a difference between the
compilers from Xcode-1.2 and from Xcode-1.5.
Martin Costabel wrote:
ããã wrote:
[]
ld: Undefined symbols:
Array::transpose() const
[]
Failed: compiling octave-2.1.57-3 failed
I am now convinced that this is a problem with the c++ compiler from
Xcode-1.5. I get this compiled correctly with
c++ (GCC) 3.3 20030304 (Apple Computer, Inc. bui
David R. Morrison wrote:
On Aug 21, 2004, at 10:48 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
BuildDependsOnly: false
[]
I think he means that you should ask the maintainers of those packages
to put that line into their packages.
I don't know any more what I meant there, please scratch it. g77 at
least seems
>
> Why wait til then to tell them? How would the Apple community react if
> Apple's Software Update stopped checking for updated software, but
> appeared to still be working, and Apple knew about it, and had a fix,
> but didn't tell anyone about it unless they figured out that it wasn't
> workin
On Aug 21, 2004, at 12:16 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
On Aug 21, 2004, at 10:48 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Koen van der Drift wrote:
Hi,
The plplot package that I maintain depends on g77 and tcltk-dev,
because it uses those header files to generate plots. However, those
packages are marked Buil
On Aug 21, 2004, at 12:15 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
and then from within the fink-0.22.1 directory, run the command
./inject.pl
Sorry, typo, this should just be
./inject.pl
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Bla
At 11:35 -0400 21/8/04, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Aug 21, 2004, at 10:34 AM, Kevin Horton wrote:
At 16:01 +0200 21/8/04, David H. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Kevin Horton wrote:
|
| There must be many other unstable users who have Fink 0.22.0, and they
| need to b
On Aug 21, 2004, at 10:48 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Koen van der Drift wrote:
Hi,
The plplot package that I maintain depends on g77 and tcltk-dev,
because it uses those header files to generate plots. However, those
packages are marked BuildDependsOnly. Is it ok if I put those
packages in Depe
The fink-0.22.0 package manager, which was available briefly in the
unstable tree this past week, had a bug which prevents further updating
via rsync. If you installed this version of fink, you can recover by
running the command
fink install fink-0.21.2-1
which will downgrade fink to the ver
On Aug 21, 2004, at 10:34 AM, Kevin Horton wrote:
At 16:01 +0200 21/8/04, David H. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Kevin Horton wrote:
|
| There must be many other unstable users who have Fink 0.22.0, and
they
| need to be told what to do to restore selfupdate functional
Koen van der Drift wrote:
Hi,
The plplot package that I maintain depends on g77 and tcltk-dev, because
it uses those header files to generate plots. However, those packages
are marked BuildDependsOnly. Is it ok if I put those packages in
Depends anyway, or is there another way to solve this?
If
At 16:01 +0200 21/8/04, David H. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Kevin Horton wrote:
|
| There must be many other unstable users who have Fink 0.22.0, and they
| need to be told what to do to restore selfupdate functionality. I
| hesitate to post something myself, as I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Kevin Horton wrote:
|
| There must be many other unstable users who have Fink 0.22.0, and they
| need to be told what to do to restore selfupdate functionality. I
| hesitate to post something myself, as I'm not a core developer, and I
| don't have
At 21:22 -0400 19/8/04, David R. Morrison wrote:
On Aug 19, 2004, at 8:12 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
Daniel Macks wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 12:55:02AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
Yes, I think it is a bug in the new fink.
In SelfUpdate.pm, the line
next unless ($tree =~ /stable/);
was changed
Hi,
The plplot package that I maintain depends on g77 and tcltk-dev,
because it uses those header files to generate plots. However, those
packages are marked BuildDependsOnly. Is it ok if I put those packages
in Depends anyway, or is there another way to solve this?
thanks,
- koen.
--
William Scott wrote:
[]
computers. I am happy to put it into cvs if no one objects but don't
know what to do about the maintainer issue.
I think pymol's current maintainer is one of those officially recognized
as inactive. There will be no objections if you mention him in DescPort
or DescPackag
19 matches
Mail list logo
