-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 5, 2006, at 3:01 AM, Trevor Harmon wrote:
On Jan 4, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
Careful though not to automatically add -e to a patchscript
beginning eg with
#!/usr/bin/perl
Should fink know about all possible interp
Rogue Marechal wrote:
quite minor. I just noticed that a couple - well 5 actually: giftd,
opennms, pfamserver, sleepnow and wwwblast - are wrongly marked as
unmaintained in Fink Commander.
I checked the info files and I can see no reason for that... surely enough
'fink describe' yields expected
On Tuesday, 03 January 2006 at 16:16, Michèle Garoche wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Would somebody know how to make the system find the right python
> framework in the case explained below:
>
> It is with Mac OS X 10.4.3, XCode 2.2, latest libtool in fink 10.4-
> transitional unstable
>
...
>
On Wednesday, 04 January 2006 at 22:13, Charles Lepple wrote:
> On 1/3/06, Rogue Marechal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For a start I am getting a fuzz warning of 1. I read and reread the man
> > page and I more or less understand what that means but still I can't find
> > the offending spot. I gu
On 1/5/06, William Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I figured it out. It has nothing to do with Xcode 2.2 vs. 2.1,
> or remote vs. local.
>
> For some reason, if I build it within screen (the program), it
> fails. If I build it without having invoked screen, it builds
> remotely on Xcode 2.2 a
I figured it out. It has nothing to do with Xcode 2.2 vs. 2.1,
or remote vs. local.
For some reason, if I build it within screen (the program), it
fails. If I build it without having invoked screen, it builds
remotely on Xcode 2.2 and Xcode 2.1.
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Hello,
Sadly, I would like to formally abandon maintainership of several Fink
packages, as I haven't had a Mac able to run Fink in quite a while.
Here are the packages for which I am still listed:
- x11/vice. It's a fairly straightforward program to package: it's big,
but it builds easily.
On Jan 4, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
Careful though not to automatically add -e to a patchscript
beginning eg with
#!/usr/bin/perl
Should fink know about all possible interpreters ?
I think it should, yes. There are only a few possible shells, so
hardcoding them shoul
