Re: [Fink-devel] When can we legally add stuff to the 10.4 tree?

2006-01-30 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 1/29/06, William Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Folks: I've gone through all my packages to ensure (and fix them such) that they compile with g++4 and so forth, so that they are ready for the 10.4 non-transitional tree. Some of them take forever to compile, so I want to save others

Fwd: [Fink-devel] unsupported 10.4.4 and G5 Quad requires fink modification.

2006-01-30 Thread David R. Morrison
Begin forwarded message:From: "David R. Morrison" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: January 30, 2006 11:15:15 AM PSTTo: BuildSmart [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] unsupported 10.4.4 and G5 Quad requires fink modification. On Jan 29, 2006, at 12:10 PM, BuildSmart wrote: On Jan 29, 2006, at 10:51 ,

Re: Fwd: [Fink-devel] unsupported 10.4.4 and G5 Quad requires fink modification.

2006-01-30 Thread Martin Costabel
David R. Morrison wrote: [] In that case, it sounds like whoever created your Government/Corporate install media replaced the perl 5.8.6 that was supplied by Apple with a newer perl 5.8.7. You should contact those people and explain to them that their action has made it impossible to use fink

Re: Fwd: [Fink-devel] unsupported 10.4.4 and G5 Quad requires fink modification.

2006-01-30 Thread Daniel Macks
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 11:53:55PM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: After some more exchanges with BuildSmart, [...] but he more or less convinced me (*) that he is right, and Apple did indeed deliver his machine with a system containing perl-5.8.7. Is there no way to get a confirmation from