Re: [Fink-devel] ghemical, freeglut, 10.4

2006-02-27 Thread Mark Tracy
William Scott wrote:  Hi Folks: I just changed ghemical's dependency (not to be confused with   chemical dependency) from glut to freeglut on my machine and verified   that this works. There is currently no maintainer for ghemical.  Does anyone mind if I   update it?  Unless someone is chomping a

Re: [Fink-devel] KDE builds on Intel! (mostly)

2006-02-27 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
On Feb 27, 2006, at 9:57 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: The blocker for kdeaccessibility3 is gstreamer (at least) which uses assembly language files for it's x86 build. Unfortunately, Apple's assembler appears to use a different syntax than the Gnu assembler and dies horribly when trying to pars

[Fink-devel] Q: Trees search order or precedence?

2006-02-27 Thread Adrian Mugnolo
Hi, I have the following setting in my fink.conf file: Trees: local/main stable/main stable/crypto unstable/main I am working on a package project that I keep updating to the "local" tree. Two other packages with the same name exist under both "stable" and "unstable" trees. Which is the proper

[Fink-devel] KDE builds on Intel! (mostly)

2006-02-27 Thread Daniel Johnson
Just to let everyone know, I've built all of bundle-kde on Intel, except for kdeaccessibility3 and koffice. Along the way I've fixed Intel building of some dependecies and emailed maintainers about some others. The blocker for kdeaccessibility3 is gstreamer (at least) which uses assembly

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] valknut-ssl on 10.3

2006-02-27 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 2/27/06, Hanspeter Niederstrasser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, it's a partially known issue. dclib0 as present in version > 0.3.5-2 needs automake1.7=1.7.6 to build (which is in stable; 1.7.9 is > in unstable). It had to depend on a fixed %r to get around the version > difference, but

[Fink-devel] Pmw and Blt on 10.4 (broken) v.s 10.4-transitional (not broken)

2006-02-27 Thread William Scott
Here's a screenshot for purposes of disambiguation, as they say in the wiki business: http://www.chemistry.ucsc.edu/~wgscott/temp/messedup.png This shows a remote display of Pmw/blt working on 10.4-transitional and not working on 10.4.

[Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] valknut-ssl on 10.3

2006-02-27 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
Thanks, it's a partially known issue. dclib0 as present in version 0.3.5-2 needs automake1.7=1.7.6 to build (which is in stable; 1.7.9 is in unstable). It had to depend on a fixed %r to get around the version difference, but the stable automake1.7 %r was increased w/out fixing the %r in dclib

[Fink-devel] python, pmw and Blt

2006-02-27 Thread William Scott
Howdie: This seems to be can-o-worms day. Currently there is no dependency in the fink pmw-py package for blt, but there are Blt-specific modules (and demos). I just tried them and one partially fails and the second one I tried fails completely. So I think pmw in 10.4-non-transitional is

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposal: New percent-expansion for full version (Was: HEAD buildlocks (and maybe others?) don't handle epoch)

2006-02-27 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
On Feb 27, 2006, at 6:07 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: if (defined $epoch) {%V="%e:%v-%r"} else {%V="%v-%r"} More or less, though it's actually just $pv->get_fullversion() . If an old fink that doesn't understand %V encounters it, do you think it will break significantly? IE: Do we need a new I

[Fink-devel] Re: Fink-devel digest, Vol 1 #2227 - 14 msgs

2006-02-27 Thread William Scott
> If gle3 switches to using freeglut, does that break things that link > against gle3 and were compiled when gle3 was using glut? > > dan I just grepped through the 10.4 info files and couldn't find anything that depends on gle3... I was going to test this to see. Bill -

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: mixed blt-dev dependencies on pythons

2006-02-27 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 09:20:24PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote: > I believe the BuildConflicts on blt-dev was added to python24 > by Daniel Macks to avoid it accidentally being linked into python24. > The note at... > > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/fink/dists/10.4-transitional/unstable/

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposal: New percent-expansion for full version (Was: HEAD buildlocks (and maybe others?) don't handle epoch)

2006-02-27 Thread Daniel Macks
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:58:19PM -0500, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: > On Feb 27, 2006, at 1:22 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: > > > >It's a bug in the .info file. The SplitOffs had "Depends: %N (= %v-% > >r)". But now that there's an epoch, that should be "Depends: %N (= % > >e:%v-%r)". > > > >I propose

Re: [Fink-devel] ghemical, freeglut, 10.4

2006-02-27 Thread Daniel Macks
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:05:41PM -0800, William Scott wrote: > > Which then brings up the ever-popular glut/freeglut issue: Should we > try to change over in the 10.4 tree? > > These packages currently depend on glut: > > graphics/glui.info > graphics/lablgl.info > graphics/lightlab.info >

Re: [Fink-devel] ghemical, freeglut, 10.4

2006-02-27 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 2/27/06, William Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Folks: > > I just changed ghemical's dependency (not to be confused with > chemical dependency) from glut to freeglut on my machine and verified > that this works. > > There is currently no maintainer for ghemical. Does anyone mind if I >

Re: [Fink-devel] ESP Ghostscript

2006-02-27 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
At Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:42:15 -0500, Daniel Johnson wrote: > > At the very least, this needs to backup any existing files and > restore them at package removal. A better solution is to include a > script with the package which does the actual installation into /usr > and handles restoration a

[Fink-devel] ghemical, freeglut, 10.4

2006-02-27 Thread William Scott
Hi Folks: I just changed ghemical's dependency (not to be confused with chemical dependency) from glut to freeglut on my machine and verified that this works. There is currently no maintainer for ghemical. Does anyone mind if I update it? Unless someone is chomping at the bit, I could

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposal: New percent-expansion for full version (Was: HEAD buildlocks (and maybe others?) don't handle epoch)

2006-02-27 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 27, 2006, at 1:22 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: On Feb 27, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: So either there's a bug in get_depends (either its implementation or how it is being called in this code snippet) or there's a bug in your .info

[Fink-devel] Proposal: New percent-expansion for full version (Was: HEAD buildlocks (and maybe others?) don't handle epoch)

2006-02-27 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
On Feb 27, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: So either there's a bug in get_depends (either its implementation or how it is being called in this code snippet) or there's a bug in your .info file (missing %e in the Depends line). It's a bug in the .info file. The SplitOffs had "Depends: %N

Re: [Fink-devel] Gettext stable-unstable switching on 10.4 tree

2006-02-27 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 06:48:21AM -0800, David R. Morrison wrote: > > There is a deeper issue here which perhaps we need to resolve: when > is it appropriate for a dependency to say (= %v-%r) and when should > it say (>= %v-%r)? > > My first take on this is that among splitoffs of a given pa

Re: [Fink-devel] How to deal with gconf files?

2006-02-27 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 07:16:39PM -0500, Sebastien Maret wrote: > I am updating the gnucash package in fink, but I don't know how to > deal with gconf files. There are two types of files. The first ones > are .schema files, that get installed in %i/sw/etc/gconf/schemas. For > what i saw in other p

Re: [Fink-devel] Some observations on Gnome on Intel Macs

2006-02-27 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 11:39:45AM -0500, Daniel Johnson wrote: > > The issue is that gnome-vfs2 2.10.x is too new for control-center2 > and gnome-panel which are both 2.6.x. The methods they rely on no > longer exist. Now that we have KDE3.5.1, gnome-menus, a dependency for modern version of

Re: [Fink-devel] Gettext stable-unstable switching on 10.4 tree

2006-02-27 Thread David R. Morrison
On Feb 25, 2006, at 2:16 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: On Feb 25, 2006, at 4:07 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: So its only because we don't have a deb for (old) gettext-tools? If I built the old gettext-tools first it would be OK? Gah, I've been getting things wrong. Lemme see if I can get thi