[Fink-devel] autogen-dev anyone?

2006-04-09 Thread Martin Costabel
The autogen-dev package installs a file /sw/include/options.h which interferes with the building of a couple of packages that use their own options.h during building. Several packages have noticed this and have BuildConflicts (gcc4, g95), one (cm3-dev) has the quaint remark This package

Re: [Fink-devel] autogen-dev anyone?

2006-04-09 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 9 avr. 2006 à 09:29, Martin Costabel a écrit : The autogen-dev package installs a file /sw/include/options.h which interferes with the building of a couple of packages that use their own options.h during building. Several packages have noticed this and have BuildConflicts (gcc4, g95),

[Fink-devel] fortran and intel (again, sorry)

2006-04-09 Thread William Scott
Yesterday I impulse-purchased an imac intel. Today, in order to avoid parental responsibilities, I am trying to get fink working. (I accidently transfered my older /sw from my G4 laptop and a surprising amount works, but today moved that out of the way and started anew.) My first

[Fink-devel] pysqlite2-py and trac

2006-04-09 Thread Kurt Schwehr
Hi All, I was looking into the implications of getting the latest pysqlite2-py sqlite interface into fink and discovered that if I commit the driver into the tree, it will break trac for users that already have trac running (which is not nice). This is because sqlite2 and sqlite3 have

Re: [Fink-devel] fortran and intel (again, sorry)

2006-04-09 Thread Martin Costabel
William Scott wrote: Yesterday I impulse-purchased an imac intel. Today, in order to avoid parental responsibilities, I am trying to get fink working. (I accidently transfered my older /sw from my G4 laptop and a surprising amount works, but today moved that out of the way and started

Re: [Fink-devel] fortran and intel (again, sorry)

2006-04-09 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Martin Costabel wrote: William Scott wrote: Yesterday I impulse-purchased an imac intel. Today, in order to avoid parental responsibilities, I am trying to get fink working. (I accidently transfered my older /sw from my G4 laptop and a surprising amount works, but today moved that out of

Re: [Fink-devel] autogen-dev anyone?

2006-04-09 Thread Martin Costabel
David Bacher wrote: On 4/9/06, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know what this package is used for and whether moving its options.h from /sw/include/ to /sw/share/autogen/ would be noticed by anyone at all? As the listed maintainer, I'm happy to describe what this package

Re: [Fink-devel] fortran and intel (again, sorry)

2006-04-09 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 12:07 -0600, Jeff Whitaker wrote: Bill: g95 does work on intel (gfortran doesn't). I've recently modified octave, fftw, and scipy-py to use g95. I'll be working on converting all packages to use g95. The latest snapshot of gcc-4.2's gfortran should also work on

Re: [Fink-devel] autogen-dev anyone?

2006-04-09 Thread David Bacher
On 4/9/06, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know what this package is used for and whether moving its options.h from /sw/include/ to /sw/share/autogen/ would be noticed by anyone at all? As the listed maintainer, I'm happy to describe what this package is used for. It's

Re: [Fink-devel] fortran and intel (again, sorry)

2006-04-09 Thread William Scott
Thanks. But I could not figure out how to get 4.2 with subversion (I can do it for 4.1). For laughs, I returned to the stable release, 4.0.3, and found gfortran 4.0.3 compiles on intel. I am trying now to use it to compile ccp4. (I got mixed results with g95, but it helped with other

Re: [Fink-devel] fortran and intel (again, sorry)

2006-04-09 Thread David R. Morrison
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 12:07 -0600, Jeff Whitaker wrote: Bill: g95 does work on intel (gfortran doesn't). I've recently modified octave, fftw, and scipy-py to use g95. I'll be working on converting all packages to use g95. The latest

Re: [Fink-devel] fortran and intel (again, sorry)

2006-04-09 Thread David R. Morrison
On Apr 9, 2006, at 7:11 PM, William Scott wrote: Thanks. But I could not figure out how to get 4.2 with subversion (I can do it for 4.1). You don't need to use subversion, since they release weekly snapshots of the code. For laughs, I returned to the stable release, 4.0.3, and