Re: [Fink-devel] gcc4 split

2006-07-12 Thread David Fang
> > I see. Forget about 4.0.x then. Supposing that support for > > i686-apple-darwin is added for the 4.1 series, would that be enough > > motivation to split 4.1 apart from 4.2? I've noticed the .patch work for > > your 4.2 package, mostly in the configure department. Has anyone looked > > int

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc4 split

2006-07-12 Thread Jeff Whitaker
David Fang wrote: >>> Would it be possible (and a good idea?) to split the gcc4 package >>> into release-branches? e.g. gcc4.0 (currently 4.0.3), gcc4.1 (currently >>> 4.1.1) and gcc4.2 (whatever recent snapshot)? With the current 10.4 >>> trees, I have to install my own (FSF) 4.0.x and 4

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc4 split (was: libgfortran .so bump)

2006-07-12 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jul 12, 2006, at 11:19 PM, David Fang wrote: > libgfortran.so.0 -> gcc 4.0.3 > libgfortran.so.1 -> gcc 4.1.1 > libgfortran.so.2 -> gcc 4.2 > > The current gcc4 in unstable has a bogus libgfortran.so.1 since it > already is probably missing the abo

[Fink-devel] gcc4 split (was: libgfortran .so bump)

2006-07-12 Thread David Fang
> > Would it be possible (and a good idea?) to split the gcc4 package > > into release-branches? e.g. gcc4.0 (currently 4.0.3), gcc4.1 (currently > > 4.1.1) and gcc4.2 (whatever recent snapshot)? With the current 10.4 > > trees, I have to install my own (FSF) 4.0.x and 4.1.1, now that > >

Re: [Fink-devel] libgfortran .so bump

2006-07-12 Thread Jack Howarth
Dan, The point though is that the current gcc4 has a bogus libgfortran.so.1. So if there are compatibility packages created they will have to be mapped as... libgfortran.so.0 -> gcc 4.0.3 libgfortran.so.1 -> gcc 4.1.1 libgfortran.so.2 -> gcc 4.2 The current gcc4 in unstable has a bogus libgfor

Re: [Fink-devel] libgfortran .so bump

2006-07-12 Thread Daniel Macks
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 07:57:38PM -0400, David Fang wrote: > > So the next time we update gcc4, we will have to contend with the > > breakage of any package that uses gfortran from gcc4. > > Jack > > Hi, > Would it be possible (and a good idea?) to split the gcc4 package > i

Re: [Fink-devel] libgfortran .so bump

2006-07-12 Thread David Fang
> So the next time we update gcc4, we will have to contend with the > breakage of any package that uses gfortran from gcc4. > Jack Hi, Would it be possible (and a good idea?) to split the gcc4 package into release-branches? e.g. gcc4.0 (currently 4.0.3), gcc4.1 (currently 4.

[Fink-devel] libgfortran .so bump

2006-07-12 Thread Jack Howarth
As I warned, the gcc developers will be bumping the .so of libgfortran for the gcc 4.2 release tomorrow... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-07/msg00128.html So the next time we update gcc4, we will have to contend with the breakage of any package that uses gfortran from gcc4.

[Fink-devel] gnucash-1.8.11-1

2006-07-12 Thread Anup Sharma
I just went through the steps of installing gnucash on my PowerBook G4 through Fink. I haven't started using it extensively yet, but the account setup steps worked great on my Mac. I used to use Gnucash on my linux box before I got the Mac a few years ago, but now I'm fed up with Quicken iss